Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die Hardcover – March 7, 2006

ISBN-13: 978-0789313706 ISBN-10: 0789313707 Edition: 0th

12 New from $21.01 103 Used from $1.21
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$21.01 $1.21
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry"
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 960 pages
  • Publisher: Universe (March 7, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0789313707
  • ISBN-13: 978-0789313706
  • Product Dimensions: 8.7 x 6.4 x 2.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 4.6 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (99 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #119,867 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Dr. Peter Boxall is a lecturer in English Literature at the University of Sussex. He has published widely on twentieth and twenty-first century fiction and drama.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Its proportions seem just right for its weight.
moose/squirrel
I read through the list of 1001 books to read and realized there is a vast number of books that I have not read that I should read.
Golden Lion
So many good books, how can you know for sure you have read them all?
Dr. Stephen Stokes

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

220 of 238 people found the following review helpful By sb-lynn TOP 500 REVIEWER on March 17, 2006
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I read a lot of books. I have often looked at the various "books about books" and been disappointed. They are usually geared toward the casual reader, and they never prove very useful to me.

This book is different. First of all, it's gorgeous. I am not thrilled with the cover, but the inside illustrations and pictures are all terrific and good quality. Almost every page contains either an author photo, or full color picture of the book cover.

The books listed all have wonderful no-spoiler, intelligent summaries. I find myself learning things about novels I've already read, and I have been reshuffling my "to read next" pile as I go along.

This is an eclectic selection, even though admittedly it's Western oriented. I don't know if any reference book can have everyone's favorites - there are a lot of novels out there. Yet this one is very comprehensive and satisfying.

Highly, highly recommended.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
164 of 180 people found the following review helpful By P. Bryant on June 10, 2006
Format: Hardcover
This is a splendid and much needed guide - the beautiful illustrations are worth the price. It should be stacked on your shelf next to "The Rough Guide to Cult Fiction" and "The salon.com Reader's Guide to Contemporary Authors" which are also recommended and which take completely different approaches. "1001 Books" presents you with The Really Great Stuff . Which is where the fun starts - this is a book all readers will want to argue passionately with. Almost at the same time as I'm finding authors I'd never heard of and making "must buy" lists, I'm shouting at the editors - "what's this? You've got three in here by Douglas Adams, and NONE by Roddy Doyle? What's all that about??" I mean, Douglas Adams is good for one, but not three... And if Douglas Adams, then Garrison Keillor...

Each book gets about 300 words which editor Peter Boxall describes like this : "What each entry does is to respond, with the cramped urgency of a deathbed confession, to what makes each novel compelling, to what it is about each novel that makes one absolutely need to read it." 1001 books - it's a lot. If you had the time and money to read every one at a rate of one per week, you'd need 19 and a quarter years, so you better get going. But seriously, you aren't going to do that. The pre-1700 section, in particular, is strictly for students of literature - I stick my neck out and say that very few will be reading "Euphues : The Anatomy of Wit" by John Lyly or "Aithiopika" by Heliodorus for fun. And then the dogged reader will be coming up against the rarely-scaled Everests of literature such as Dorothy Richardson's "Pilgrimage" (13 vols, thousands of pages) or Proust (likewise) or "Infinite Jest" (one volume, 1100 pages). Each of which are going to take you 6 months solid.
Read more ›
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
495 of 560 people found the following review helpful By moose/squirrel on September 30, 2006
Format: Hardcover
Like so many bad, bad movies, this book is a beautiful production. It features slick, heavy paper; a million color pictures; attractive, readable typeface; witty contributors. Its proportions seem just right for its weight.

But unless you just love grazing on hors d'oeuvres (and many do), you're likely to be disappointed by this beautiful but cynical exercise in marketing to the culturally insecure. As somebody has already noted: No Iliad. No Odyssey. No Aeschylus. No Euripides. No Boccaccio. No Chaucer. No Dante. No Machiavelli. No Shakespeare. No Marlowe.

No Old or New Testament. No Q'uran. No Lao-tse, Confucius, Bhagavda-Gita (really short and really good). No Beowulf. No Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.

In fact, only 13 works from before 1700 make the cut - and lest you think fun is the criterion, one of them is John Lyly's Euphues long regarded as one of the most unreadable and, shall we say, "affected" works in English literature. You get John Lyly instead of John Milton.

On the other hand, you do get 69 titles of books that have appeared since 2000. That's a lot of "classics" in record time. How did they pick these? And there's another 700 - out of 1001, if you can dig it, "you must read before you die" written in the 20th Century.

The 19th Century is well represented, I'll grant. Huck Finn is here - but not Twain's more complicated Letters from the Earth, The Mysterious Stranger, A Connecticut Yankee, or Pudd'nhead Wilson.

They also felt it necessary to fill out the list with a few short stories like Lovecraft's "The Mountains of Madness" and Gogol's "The Nose." Great stories, but two actual books had to go to make room for them. Books like The Red Badge of Courage, for example.
Read more ›
32 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
33 of 36 people found the following review helpful By Michael S. Toot on July 24, 2007
Format: Hardcover
The title implies that many types of "books" will be chosen, not just works of fiction. When you consider the many forms of literature that have appeared as books, the willful omission of this in the title is deceptive marketing. No treatises, no plays, no essays, no philosophy, no history, no biography. If I am going to have a reading list of 1001 books that I must read, I'm not going to spend my time on novels picked by strangers who have an infatuation with justifiably obscure works.

Because, in an effort to appear knowledgeable and insightful, the authors and their cohorts have selected works from the more remote niches of literature and passed over works with greater import. When the author (or the publisher's marketing department) puts "BOOKS YOU MUST READ BEFORE YOU DIE" in the title, then the works had better well be literary touchstones.

But the selection process is so uneven and so vested with the reviewers' personal favorites that you will be only halfway enlightened when you finish. Is a reader's time really better spent -- and thus bringing the reader incrementally closer to a more contented death -- reading Douglas Adams' "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" over Leo Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina"? Both are in the book. Yet the arguments for Dirk's inclusion are slim, and the literary and cultural impacts nonexistent.

(And I don't need to go into much detail about whole genres that are absent or only given lip service. For a book that presents such lofty claims, it is not worthy of the expansive-sounding title.)

The only recommendation I have for this book is to use it as a springboard for your own list of novels to read. Better yet, go chat with your local librarian about your likes and interests. You will get a far more satisfying list of books to read AND you will improve your knowledge of key works of literature.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?