The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States [Paperback]

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: 2004

Nearly three thousand people died in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In Lower Manhattan, on a field in Pennsylvania, and along the banks of the Potomac, the United States suffered the single largest loss of life from an enemy attack on its soil. In November 2002 the United States Congress and President George W. Bush established by law the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission. This independent, bipartisan panel was directed to examine the facts and circumstances surrounding the September 11 attacks, identify lessons learned, and provide recommendations to safeguard against future acts of terrorism. This volume is the authorized edition of the Commission's final report. About the Author 9-11 Commission; Appointed by the President to investigate the circumstances surrounding the September 11 th, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

• Paperback: 568 pages
• Publisher: W W Norton & Co Inc; 1ST edition (2004)
• Language: English
• ASIN: B001IO5CKK
• Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.4 x 1.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (214 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,542,745 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

55 of 75 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars THE BIGGEST LIE EVER TOLD!!!, May 17, 2005

By 

H.R. #1 "gloerax3" - See all my reviews

This review is from: The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Authorized Edition) (Paperback)

The Warren Commission is officially off the hook about their lies on the Kennedy Assassination. 9/11 as told by mainstream sources is the biggest joke and should never be believed. The unrefutable documented facts show that there is something wrong with this report. If people don't take time and dig for the truth it's their own fault. Just don't be the one that falls into that naive batch. In the memory of the over 3000 dead on 9/11 and the countless civilians murdered by bombs in Afghanistan and Irag, along with the brave military who are fighting and dying, we can do better than a disgraceful report like this. Check the websites that are mentioned in some of the reviews here and get educated on the unrefutable documented facts. DAVID GRIFFIN is the name you should stamp on your forehead so check out his books please.

220 of 306 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars A National Disgrace Riddled with Omissions & Distortions, November 25, 2004

By 

David R. Griffin - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Authorized Edition) (Paperback)

Many people have said that this Report "reads like a novel." It is indeed surprisingly good when judged in terms of criteria appropriate to works of fiction. But the 9/11 Commission was supposed to conduct a serious investigation into the question of who was responsible for the attacks of 9/11. Instead, it simply presupposed the official conspiracy theory, according to which the attacks were planned and carried out solely by al-Qaeda. The Commission entirely ignored all evidence for the alternative conspiracy theory, according to which the attacks succeeded only because of complicity by members of the US government.

Having written a book that summarizes much of the evidence supportive of this alternative theory ("The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11"), I read "The 9/11 Commission Report" to see how it handled this evidence. I found that it simply omitted most of it and distorted the rest.

For example, the Report simply repeats the official story about the 19 Arab hijackers, failing to mention that at least six of the named men have shown up alive. It even suggests that Waleed al-Shehri, who visited the US embassy in Morocco after 9/11, stabbed a flight attendant on AA 11 before it hit the North Tower (page 5). This sloppy scholarship proves to be no aberration.

With regard to why jet fighters failed to intercept any of the flights, the Report provides a radically revisionist account of 9/11. Claiming--in contradiction to the timeline provided by NORAD on September 18, 2001--that the FAA never notified the military about Flights 175, 77, and 93 until after they crashed, the Report fails to explain why NORAD had earlier said otherwise. This new timeline also changes the starting times of all the teleconferences, in order to claim that they could not have been the means for the military to have learned about the hijackings from the FAA. Also, to bolster the claim that the shootdown order was not given until after Flight 93 had crashed, the Report also contradicts by 45 minutes all prior testimony--including Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta's eyewitness testimony to the Commission itself--as to when Vice President Cheney descended to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center.

With regard to the World Trade Center, the Report fails to mention that fire had never caused steel-frame high-rise buildings to collapse. It also, by way of suggesting why the Twin Towers could have collapsed so easily, says that the core of each building consisted of "a hollow steel shaft" (541n1), whereas in reality the core of each consisted of 47 massive steel columns. While mentioning that the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds (305), the Report otherwise fails to mention the fact that the collapses manifested 10 standard features of controlled demolitions. The Report handles the collapse of Building 7, which even FEMA admitted it could not explain, by simply failing to mention it.

With regard to the Pentagon, the Report fails to mention that the West Wing would have been the least likely target for terrorists, that its facade did not collapse until 30 minutes after the strike, and other facts in tension with the idea that the Pentagon was struck by Flight 77. And while claiming that al-Qaeda operatives did not strike a nuclear plant for fear that their plane would be shot down (245), the Report fails to point out that the Pentagon is even better protected, so that any aircraft without a military transponder would have been automatically shot down.

With regard to the FBI, the Report fails to mention many stories that are damaging to the official account of 9/11. These omitted stories include attorney David Schippers' report that several FBI agents told him of their advance knowledge of the New York attacks, the complaint by Coleen Rowley (Time magazine person of the year) that FBI headquarters sabotaged the Moussaoui investigation, and the damning allegations made by FBI translator Sibel Edmonds in her 3.5-hour testimony to the Commission.

What about the allegation by Craig Unger (popularized in Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11") that the White House authorized a private flight carrying Saudis on September 13, before private flights were otherwise allowed? The Report "refutes" this allegation by simply saying that US airspace had been reopened at 11 AM that day (329, 556n25), thereby ignoring the crucial distinction between commercial flights, which were then allowed, and private flights, which were not.

The Report also provides radically ahistorical accounts of the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq, ignoring all the evidence that these attacks were motivated by desires to establish military bases and to take over the oil (rather than by desires to protect human rights and promote democracy). In this and other ways, the Report omits all evidence that the Bush administration had plans of the sort that could have provided motives for allowing or even engineering the attacks of 9/11.

I have documented these and dozens of other problems in my book "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions." These problems are so great that the Report, instead of being nominated for a National Book Award, should be designated a National Disgrace.

49 of 67 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars A Testament to Our Collective Stupidity, August 11, 2005

By 

Ricardo Lotti "Ricky" (San Francisco, CA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Authorized Edition) (Paperback)

The unfortunate precedent for this report was the report of the Warren Commission. The Warren Commission was supposed to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination. A notorius case of the Feds investigating themselves, its conclusions amounted to outright lies which totally ignored critical suppressed facts in the case! The Warren Commission bet that the public would accept such a farce due primarily to the fact that respected "leaders" and "experts" conducted the entire investigation as though critical suppressed evidence in the case, didn't exist. It proved to be right!

The 9/11 Commission reprises the Warren Commission farce by using the same essential tactics in supposedly getting to the bottom of the "9/11 attacks". Another case of the Feds investigating themselves; it also employs respected "leaders" and "experts" to omit, lie, and arrive at ridiculous conclusions that completely ignore critical suppressed evidence in the case! True to form, an even dumber 21st century public seems to have largely swallowed another round of doublespeak and deception from the Feds! A mountain of critical suppressed 9/11 facts and contradictory evidence is treated by all as though it doesn't exist! How can a crime such as 9/11, or the JFK murder for that matter, be investigated without examining all of the evidence? What results is an official cover-up and media censorship, which is a total sham! When a people succumbs to such ridiculous levels of denial and foolishness, such a people shall sooner or later find themselves living under tyranny!