7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Wonderfully Irreverent, February 12, 1998
This review is from: 1601 And Is Shakespeare Dead? (Mark Twain Works) (Hardcover)
This book is fantastic! Twain tells it from the point of view of the Cup Bearer to Queen Elizabeth I, a man who is totally disgusted to see Her Majesty sitting around speaking crudities with such personages as William Shakespeare and Sir Walter Raleigh.
The tale is hilarious, vulgar, liberally illustrated with ranuchy woodcuts that are best left unseen by children and young adolescents (for example, one of a cardinal with a raised surplice, urinating rather graphically, and several of men with, shall we say, large appendages).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Probably the funniest thing ever written., May 12, 2000
This review is from: 1601 And Is Shakespeare Dead? (Mark Twain Works) (Hardcover)
Yes, this IS a fart joke. In fact, rumor has it that Twain's poker buddies were its first readers. The then Sec'y of the Army had West Point Press publish it.The transcendant skill and humor raises this to greatness, despite the subject. In fact, Twain probably took this as a huge challenge.Keep it from the youngest until they can appreciate it, but read it aloud alone together every Valentine's day.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Shake-speare is Still Alive, October 7, 2011
In "Is Shakespeare Dead?" Twain entered the Shakespeare authorship debate with a bang. The work is pure Twain brilliance. Twain begins by listing the absolute known facts about Shakespeare of Stratford, which can fit nicely on one sheet of paper. He then examines the thousands of pages of Stratford Shakespeare biographies written by academics, and in his own hilariously sarcastic way mocks these "surmisers of surmised facts" explaining how they have inflated a "chipmunk's trail through Stratford" into a literary "Hercules" of renown.
Twain next speaks of "authentic authorship" by pointing out with convincing detail that unless you have walked the walk, you can't talk the talk. For example, he says Bret Harte attempted to write stories about life as a Mississipi riverboat captain or a sailor on the high seas, but that any real riverboat captain or sailor could tell in the first few lines that Harte was writing from book learning, not from actual experience as a captain or sailor. Twain nicely says that authors (no matter how brilliant) can't fake the language and tone of real experience when it comes to endeavors involving high levels of skill. You have to walk the walk to convincingly talk the talk. He then proceeds to point out one simple fact: the Shake-speare canon was written by a man who was deeply experienced in sixteenth-century law and legal procedures--as numerous legal historians of that period have attested--deeply experienced, not just a law clerk for a short period. Twain then proceeds to point out that not one shred of evidence exists that Stratford Shakespeare even served as a law clerk, let alone a deeply experienced barrister or judge.
Twain goes on in this vein in regard to the numerous aspects of Shake-speare's works that prove the author was a member of Elizabeth's court, was widely traveled, knew several languages, and was in actuality a Hercules of literary proportions, leaving us masterpiece after masterpiece, not the chipmunk who left his trail through Stratford.
Twain actually spends relatively little space talking about Francis Bacon as the author of the plays, despite what other reviewers seem to suggest, although this was Twain's belief at the time he wrote his book.
Twain, Freud, Washington Irving, William James, along with numerous others through the years have long been convinced that Shakespeare of Stratford was not the author of the plays. It has only been in the last 100 years though that a consensus has formed about who the author was. That consensus holds for Edward DeVere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford. For an excellent book, among many, that DeVere was the author, see Mark Anderson's book "Shakespeare by Another Name." This is a highly controversial subject. For a book often praised that argues for the Stratford man as the real author, see Irvin Leigh Matus's "Shakespeare in Fact." After studying both, I am with Twain: the factual evidence is overwhelmingly minimal (still that one page and a lot of surmising) for the Stratford man, while the evidence for DeVere as Shake-speare is an avalanche of fascinating and convincing historical and documentary detail. Shake-speare is still alive, in the phoenix of DeVere.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
