- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
|Price:||$18.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details|
Channel 4 documentary: 2001: The Making of a Myth
Standing on the Shoulders of Kubrick: The Legacy of 2001
Vision of a Future Passed: The Prophecy of 2001
2001: A Space Odyssey - A Look Behind the Future
2001: FX and Early Conceptual Artwork
Look: Stanley Kubrick!
Audio-only interview with Stanley Kubrick
In my opinion this is Kubrick's best film and one of the best films ever made.
While this is no 70mm print, the blu-ray quality is a noticeable improvement from the original dvd and includes some great special features.
The reason why this movie is so good is because it makes you think- it's a lot like reading a book.
I think for this movie, you either love it (like my husband), or hate it (like I did). I found it very boring and hard to sit through, especially the scenes of just landscape or... Read morePublished 3 hours ago by G. Hu
Slow. Boring. Bad depiction of A.I. Bad depiction of evolution. Bad depiction of space. It's more of an acid trippers hallucination than any kind of intriguing story about... Read morePublished 1 day ago by Brian Ochs
|Topic||From this Discussion|
|Amazon is stupid||
Same here. One semi-workaround is to search the reviews using "blu-ray" as your search key. It's not perfect, but it weeds out a lot of the SD garbage.
Jan 23, 2008 by Michael P. Stewart | See all 23 posts
|Is paying extra for old movies in hd worth it?||
Almost all movies since the dawn of motion picture have been shot on 35mm film. All new hollywood movies are still shot with 35mm cameras. Only a few movies have been shot on HD cameras, like the new starwars movies. HD cameras have a LOWER resolution than 35mm cameras meening that yes old movies... Read More
Oct 18, 2007 by Sir moviefan | See all 22 posts
|Quality of BluRay Disc||
"2001:" Looks OUTSTANDING.
That's my opinion, at least.
When I show off to others the capability of what a Blu-ray disc can do,
this is the title I use.
It is definitely a major step up from the early DVD's,
including some great special features.
If you read the reviews,
you may... Read More
Jan 5, 2009 by Addison Brodrick | See all 52 posts
|What is this film saying?||
I think the singular meaning that you're seeking just doesn't exist. This film is made in a way that forces one to ponder it's meaning, I think that it was never intended to be fully explained. That's the simple beauty in a film like this, it says so much without saying much at all. I think the... Read More
Dec 11, 2008 by Jason Torrey | See all 73 posts
|Something Got Chopped||
In regards to the uneducated 2.35:1 zealot reviewer, as a Director of Photography, I can state unequivocally that 2001 is supposed to be in 2.20:1 aspect ratio. It was shot in 2.20:1. It was not shot in Cinemascope (or anamorphic Panavision), which is 2.35:1. It was shot with straight lenses in... Read More
Nov 10, 2010 by Gerry | See all 13 posts
|I got a knock-off||Be the first to reply|