- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
|Price:||$12.85 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details|
|You Save:||$2.13 (14%)|
Channel 4 documentary: 2001: The Making of a Myth
Standing on the Shoulders of Kubrick: The Legacy of 2001
Vision of a Future Passed: The Prophecy of 2001
2001: A Space Odyssey - A Look Behind the Future
2001: FX and Early Conceptual Artwork
Look: Stanley Kubrick!
Audio-only interview with Stanley Kubrick
Very good movie for 1968. A little slow paced but, it kept me engaged. Good story line, plot.Published 1 day ago by Rodney R.
My favorite movie of all times! Picture quality is just stunning on my 58" TV. 70mm film makes all the difference in digital-transfer process. Read morePublished 1 day ago by Mirza Hasanefendic
Some years ago film critic Roger Ebert asked Tom Hanks what movie had had the most influence on his becoming an actor, and Hanks answered "2001. Read morePublished 2 days ago by John J. Puccio
I don't get this film's appeal it is a slow,boring,pretentious, and overall hollow that has only one has redeeming quality(Hal 9000).Published 2 days ago by Mark Gonzales
I'm amazed every time i watch 2001. Its one of the most beautiful looking and intense movies i have ever seen.Published 3 days ago by Will
I work with many computer knowledgeable young adults who grew up in a PC world. None of them however had seen 2001 A Space Odyssey. Read morePublished 4 days ago by emmanuel zazulak
2001: A Space Odyssey is arguably the greatest sci-fi film ever made. I would go so far as to say it is not only Kubrick's masterpiece but that it is among the greatest films of... Read morePublished 4 days ago by Luke
|Topic||From this Discussion|
|Amazon is stupid||
Same here. One semi-workaround is to search the reviews using "blu-ray" as your search key. It's not perfect, but it weeds out a lot of the SD garbage.
Jan 23, 2008 by Michael P. Stewart | See all 23 posts
|Is paying extra for old movies in hd worth it?||
Almost all movies since the dawn of motion picture have been shot on 35mm film. All new hollywood movies are still shot with 35mm cameras. Only a few movies have been shot on HD cameras, like the new starwars movies. HD cameras have a LOWER resolution than 35mm cameras meening that yes old movies... Read More
Oct 18, 2007 by Sir moviefan | See all 22 posts
|Quality of BluRay Disc||
"2001:" Looks OUTSTANDING.
That's my opinion, at least.
When I show off to others the capability of what a Blu-ray disc can do,
this is the title I use.
It is definitely a major step up from the early DVD's,
including some great special features.
If you read the reviews,
you may... Read More
Jan 5, 2009 by Addison Brodrick | See all 52 posts
|What is this film saying?||
I think the singular meaning that you're seeking just doesn't exist. This film is made in a way that forces one to ponder it's meaning, I think that it was never intended to be fully explained. That's the simple beauty in a film like this, it says so much without saying much at all. I think the... Read More
Dec 11, 2008 by Jason Torrey | See all 73 posts
|Something Got Chopped||
In regards to the uneducated 2.35:1 zealot reviewer, as a Director of Photography, I can state unequivocally that 2001 is supposed to be in 2.20:1 aspect ratio. It was shot in 2.20:1. It was not shot in Cinemascope (or anamorphic Panavision), which is 2.35:1. It was shot with straight lenses in... Read More
Nov 10, 2010 by Gerry | See all 13 posts
|I got a knock-off||Be the first to reply|