- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
|Price:||$8.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details|
|You Save:||$15.99 (64%)|
Should have known what I was in for when I saw spelling typos in the trailer. If you can't afford a proofreader, then you definitely can't afford lights, camera, and action. Read morePublished 16 months ago by A. Max
This is the sequel to the first film 2001 maniacs but the first film it looked like it had better quality
the sequel quality is is ok it's not all that but still an... Read more
A rather bad conclusion to the original 2001 maniacs. Based on stereotypes and oddities it doesn't pull the watcher in but push them away with crude humor and rather unnecessary... Read morePublished 22 months ago by Chris
2001 MANIACS: FIELD OF SCREAMS (2010) - This film was shot in 12 days for $400,000, but it has the look and feel as if it was filmed in one night on a drunken dare for $1.99. Read morePublished 22 months ago by Fred Adelman
Weak acting, terrible storyline, poor effects, even for this genre this is bad. Don't bother unless you just love racist violence.Published 23 months ago by wRecKaGe
Who would dare make this crap? this filth? this garbage? this fart?
This movie is atrocious.
This movie's acting is mediocre...no, it is totally awful. Read more
As far as B movies go, this one was great. And, for my taste, this was WAY more entertaining than the first. Read morePublished on February 22, 2013 by binxxx
Ugh! This is a really poorly made, acted, and executed movie, and I personally LIKE bad movies. Just not worth watching, folks. Read morePublished on February 17, 2013 by Wolfmantex