Qty:1
FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • 2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams (Unrated)
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams (Unrated)


List Price: $24.98
Price: $6.49 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
You Save: $18.49 (74%)
Only 5 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
17 new from $1.98 17 used from $1.37
Watch Instantly with Rent Buy
Other Formats & Versions Amazon Price New from Used from
DVD
"Please retry"
1-Disc Version
$6.49
$1.98 $1.37

Deal of the Day: Sons of Anarchy: Seasons 1-6 plus coupon for Season 7
Today only and while supplies last, save up to 67% on the Sons of Anarchy: Season 1-6 limited edition box-set plus receive a coupon code via email to get a copy of Sons of Anarchy: Season 7 to complete your collection. Offer ends December 18, 2014 at 11:59pm PST. Learn more
 
 
Buy This DVD and Watch it Instantly
Watch the Amazon Instant Video rental on your PC, Mac, compatible TV or compatible device at no charge when you buy this DVD from Amazon.com. Your rental will expire 2 days after you begin watching or 30 days after your disc purchase, whichever occurs first. The Amazon Instant Video version will be available in Your Video Library and is provided as a gift with disc purchase. Available to US customers only. See Terms and Conditions.
 
 


Frequently Bought Together

2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams (Unrated) + 2001 Maniacs + Two Thousand Maniacs! (Special Edition)
Price for all three: $20.87

Buy the selected items together

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Product Details

  • Actors: Bill Moseley, Christopher McDaniel
  • Directors: Tim Sullivan
  • Format: Multiple Formats, Color, Dolby, NTSC, Widescreen
  • Language: English
  • Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Rated: Unrated
  • Studio: First Look Pictures
  • DVD Release Date: July 20, 2010
  • Run Time: 86 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (46 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B003E1QCZO
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #211,485 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)

Special Features

None.

Editorial Reviews

From director Tim Sullivan comes the eagerly anticipated second installment of the gore-soaked horror-comedy franchise, 2001 MANIACS: FIELD OF SCREAMS! The Southern residents of Pleasant Valley take their cannibalistic Guts N' Glory Jamboree on the road to Iowa where they encounter spoiled Northern heiresses Rome and Tina Sheraton and the cast and crew of their ''Road Rascals'' reality show. Performing ''The Bloodiest Show on Earth,'' our Southern Maniacs prove to be more than ratings killers in what John Landis has called ''one of the rare sequels that surpasses the original.''

Customer Reviews

That said, this film is one of the worst films I've ever seen.
M. TURNER
The whole movie felt like a bunch of people trying to make a parody of a horror movie.
Jim Straley
Weak acting, terrible storyline, poor effects, even for this genre this is bad.
Amazon Customer

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Amazon Customer VINE VOICE on August 1, 2010
Format: DVD
the first 2001 maniacs wasn't so bad. it was an amusing comic-horror flick about rednecks gone wild, but, really, what other kinds of rednecks are there? as typical with sequels, this movie took everything from the first and cranked up the ridiculousness. as a male, i have a deep appreciation for nudity, but incessant nudity for nudity's sake in a movie that only offers nudity is annoying. there are other better options for nudity and beyond if that's your thing, but it should be used with some purpose in a non-porn film. not so here. perhaps its hard to articulate, but there was just something grating about this film. the characters were more annoying than amusing, the jokes more puerile than the predecessor, and a far less interesting story than the first. in the first, there is actually some character and plot development before the red necks go nuts. in this one, its immediate; just a bunch of yanks run into a traveling group of rednecks and the killing starts. this movie was much more about disconnected shots of brutal, seemingly creative, yet painfully pedestrian killings. no story, boring.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Nigel Waspfinger on September 13, 2010
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
When will I learn? I was gullible enough to order this when all the 5 star reviews appeared. I feel pretty stupid now, it's perfectly obvious that the good reviews are planted by folks involved with the film. What do these people do in their spare time? Go round old ladies' houses and con them out of their savings? They conned me out of my $11 for sure.

This film absolutely reeks. It stinks to high heaven. Even as a fan of bad movies, this had no redeeming qualities.

I feel robbed.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By C. Elliston on October 10, 2010
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
Wow...this was just bad. Bad writing, bad production, bad sound...just bad. The characters just weren't as much fun as the ones in the first one. Other than the very brief HuckleBilly rap song, this was horrible. Even though I like Bill Moseley, this movie is really missing Robert Englund. This feels like a movie that someone threw together in a weekend. Hopefully it'll be the end of the series.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Happy go lucky on August 18, 2010
Format: DVD
Ok first off I am a big fan of the first one. It obviously wasn't the biggest budget or best acting I've ever seen. That was the point though. The second one on the other hand I wouldn't recommend watching for free. It barely has any gore the acting is some of the worst I've ever seen and I usually don't mind it. There is nothing good about this movie at all. Watch the first one.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By M. TURNER on July 28, 2010
Format: DVD
It's not often at all that I say that a film "is one of the worst films I've ever seen." That said, this film is one of the worst films I've ever seen. Everything about it -- and I do mean everything -- is awful. It's not even so "bad" it's fun. There isn't an element of the film that I can think of that didn't in some way offend me greatly as a filmgoer, as someone who actually paid good money to see the it.

The film is cheap, and I don't just mean budget-wise. The writing is cheap. Heck, the writing is below cheap. To say it's sophomoric is an insult to sophomoric writers everywhere. The directing is cheap, dreadful and uncreative. The acting is... It was so bad there's no point in even describing it. On the whole, it was like Tim Sullivan and his friends had an extra $58.60 around and decided to make a film. They gathered a lot of ninth-rate fetish show performers and wanna-be actors who were turned down for roles in YouTube fan films, and they were able to blackmail Bill Moseley with something to get him on-board. They collected set pieces from the trash dump after the circus left town, and then they wrote a script on the back of a Waffle House receipt. Yes, it was that offendingly awful and retched.

After watching this contemptible farce of a movie I developed a new appreciation for Uwe Boll and all those Sci Fi Original Motion pictures I used to think were crap.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Jeremy S. Richard on November 3, 2010
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
I was a big fan of the movie "2001 Maniacs" with Robert Englund, I found it to be an amusing mix of gore, comedy, and horror. While based on an older movie, I think the supernatural elements of the story made it far better than the stereotypical "Deliverance" inspired killer redneck horror movie.

The problem with this movie is not just the incredibly low production values, but that they turned this movie into a complete farce rather than trying to make any pretensions of it having any horror in it at all, even in a tertiary manner.

While a sequel to "2001 Maniacs" it doesn't even keep the mythology intact. We go from a group of ghosts haunting a cemetery full of people slaughtered during "The Civil War", who can manifest around the time of their deaths each year to claim victims, with each death bringing them closer to being able to pass on, to the ridiculous concept of these same ghosts somehow manifesting permanantly and driving around, pitching tents, and looking for victims.

Add to this ridiculous sequences like faux-music videos being performed (complete with song and record text in the corner), and it's just not all that entertaining. If you liked the original "2001 Maniacs" this is not "more of the same" this is just plain out silly... and in a bad way.

In short, I recommend avoiding this movie like the plague. "2001 Maniacs" had some potential to be turned into a decent genere-hybrid franchise, one that could have obtained a decent cult following. This atrocity has pretty much murdered any hopes of that happening.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in