- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
|Price:||$6.34 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details|
|You Save:||$13.64 (68%)|
There must be more in the book, but just watching the movie it is worthless. First 20 minutes was with monkeys and monkey fights. I got so bored I had to skip ahead. Read morePublished 3 days ago by Kax
The original modern science fiction movie. It inspired other great science fiction movies in years to come. Typically this movie is loved or hated. Read morePublished 7 days ago by Bigwasatch
While I respect what this movie tried to do when it was released, I do feel that it's far longer than it should be. Read morePublished 7 days ago by Kevin Bender
Great movie, there are quite of bit of symbolism in this movie. And seriously if you are looking for action, this is not the movie for you. Read morePublished 7 days ago by Troy Brown
Always like this. Currently I am into the moon briefing. "cultural disorientation"Published 7 days ago by John
The Quality of this Blu Ray is soooo much better than the old VHS version that I saw many years ago.
It is a great movie. Read more
|Topic||From this Discussion|
|Amazon is stupid||
Same here. One semi-workaround is to search the reviews using "blu-ray" as your search key. It's not perfect, but it weeds out a lot of the SD garbage.
Jan 23, 2008 by Michael P. Stewart | See all 23 posts
|Is paying extra for old movies in hd worth it?||
Almost all movies since the dawn of motion picture have been shot on 35mm film. All new hollywood movies are still shot with 35mm cameras. Only a few movies have been shot on HD cameras, like the new starwars movies. HD cameras have a LOWER resolution than 35mm cameras meening that yes old movies... Read More
Oct 18, 2007 by Sir moviefan | See all 22 posts
|Quality of BluRay Disc||
"2001:" Looks OUTSTANDING.
That's my opinion, at least.
When I show off to others the capability of what a Blu-ray disc can do,
this is the title I use.
It is definitely a major step up from the early DVD's,
including some great special features.
If you read the reviews,
you may... Read More
Jan 5, 2009 by Addison Brodrick | See all 52 posts
|What is this film saying?||
I think the singular meaning that you're seeking just doesn't exist. This film is made in a way that forces one to ponder it's meaning, I think that it was never intended to be fully explained. That's the simple beauty in a film like this, it says so much without saying much at all. I think the... Read More
Dec 11, 2008 by Jason Torrey | See all 73 posts
|Something Got Chopped||
In regards to the uneducated 2.35:1 zealot reviewer, as a Director of Photography, I can state unequivocally that 2001 is supposed to be in 2.20:1 aspect ratio. It was shot in 2.20:1. It was not shot in Cinemascope (or anamorphic Panavision), which is 2.35:1. It was shot with straight lenses in... Read More
Nov 10, 2010 by Gerry | See all 13 posts
|I got a knock-off||Be the first to reply|