|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
26 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The only thing that scared me was the price of the ticket.,
I can't believe I wasted $8.00 watching this movie. I have only myself to blame, since I was foolish enough to go and see how they would change the original story. Well, it was as bad as I expected it to be. THE FOG has little in common with the original classic except the premise: ghosts rising from the sea to wreak vengeance upon a small town for crimes committed a century ago. Otherwise, this film was an abomination. For example:
1)the original began with an old fisherman telling the story of the Elizabeth Dane to children around a roaring campfire. The remake began with the ship set on fire by the founders, thus eliminating the mystery. 2)Father Malone read his grandfather's journal to tell the audience the truth about the founding of the town and the curse that was about to descend upon its citizens. In the remake, we learn the truth from Elizabeth's dreams. The journal is included as a token gesture to the original, and Father Malone is all but ignored. 3) The computer-generated images of the fog and the ghosts did not frighten me. John Carpenter and Debra Hill made the fog in the original seem alive as well as menacing. 4) the cast was no different than those of films we have seen since SCREAM was released. Not one actor delivered a convincing let alone a good performance. The original had talented actors like John Houseman, Janet Leigh, Hal Holbrook, and Jamie Lee Curtis. All of whom performed admirably. 5) the director proved incapable of creating a scary movie. Then again, only a fool would dare to improve upon a horror film made by John Carpenter. 6) the ending defied logic. In the original the ghosts returned to punish Father Malone. Why Elizabeth kissed Blake and joined him in the spirit realm as his bride is incomprehensible. I hope THE FOG is the last in a long line of wretched remakes of classic horror films, but I doubt it. I can assure you, however, that this is the last time I pay to see one.
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Succesful Remake/Reinvention!,
By I have already mentioned how the effects of today can make "The Fog" do so much more than Carpenter ever imagined in 1980. Now it is time to give THE MAN his due. Rupert Wainwright (director of "Stigmata") delivers the creepy goods fast, hard, and almost nonstop. Kudos, man, Kudos. Cooper Layne's ("The Core") screenplay is also of worthy mention. Yes, some really significant changes have been made to the story. The most obvious would be the ages of the main players. Yes, we have a younger Nick Castle and Elizabeth (in the original she was not related to the town at all) Williams. However, I consider most of the changes to be for the better. Giving us more insight into Blake's (Rade Serbezija) plight was a good move I think. The poor guy really was trying to provide a better life for his people (including his lovely wife, whose role becomes quite important over the course of the film). Sadly, he was screwed over in a major way. Who wouldn't be angry if they had met the horrible fate Blake did at the hands of traitorous thieves. In closing, the movie was awesome. People will moan at the PG-13 rating, but look at the original. There was nothing really gory in that film. I saw much grisslier sights in this remake than I ever did in Carpenter's. Go see for yourself. Can you say Leprosy is really nasty? So, don't judge it on its rating, it is very intense for a PG-13, but it feels just like it should. Some critics have already called it an assembly line picture. Well, if that is true then its a darn good assembly line becasue I like what I saw. Rupert Wainwright has proved himself to be a worthwhile ("assembly line" HA, HA, HA) director. See it, enjoy it, and leave it behind until the DVD comes out. That is one horror DVD I will certainly be picking up. It had better have a good "making of" doc too. BRAVO RUPERT, COOPER, AND SELMA.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Average scares, interesting story.,
By I don't know why the movie needed to be remade, but if you want an average scare or are a Tom Welling (Smallville) fan, you won't be disappointed.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
THE FOG IT ROCKS,
By BENJAMIN SANTINO FILIPPI "BENJAMIN" (BRECKSVILLE OHIO USA) - See all my reviews
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
why does everybody hate this film?,
A Kid's Review
why does everybody hate this film. sure the plot sucks,but its just so cool and creepy that you don't care.call me crazy, but this could be one of the best horror films of the year.considering how bad venom,the amityville horror,hide and seek,and cursed were.ok I admit it I liked the ring two and boogeyman.this movie is up with the ring as one of the best
PG-13 horror movies ever
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
"AHOY, STAY AWAY FROM THE FOG!!! Far Far away!,
By I don't understand Hollywood. -B list actors -cheesy slow motion death scenes -rubber masks, I mean come on rubber bleeping masks. I've seen better costumes on Halloween night at my door. - then there was about 3 car collisions within 10 minutes. There was a point in the middle of the flick that I thought " hey wait I looks like it might be getting better" but NOOOOO!!! They had to ruin the only thing the movie had going for it (the fog) and show the people , in those rubber bleeping masks, that occupied the fog. At that point I closed my eyes and wished for death or any end to the misery that was "The Fog". It probably would have been better served as a sequel rather than a remake. Carpenter version relied on suspense rather than effects. This version had little suspense and the effects were no that much better than the original, in fact, I thought the original fog was far spookier. Go see it if you dare, but the prospect of sitting through this movie again, for me, is scarier than the film itself. Well thank you Hollywood for ruining another classic movie by doing such trash remakes like this. Keep up the good work.
8 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The Fog,
By I've never seen the original and this newer version does not particularly make me want to. Despite starting out well, the ending is a mess, not making much sense at all. The effects are pretty good and give some genuine scary moments, but that is not enough to save the movie. If you want to see this, wait for the DVD.
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Worst Movie of the Year?,
By Well, it honestly only took about 5 minutes before I heard the first whisperings in front of me and behind me about how poorly the film looked and sounded. The direction, editing, choreography... everything just seemed somewhat off and out of place. The special effects were not an improvement at all, (even the cheesy "glowing" fog from the original was better than the horrible CGI Fog of this one). The acting was stilted and wooden, and the dialogue was laughable. Very quickly I realized that I was basically watching what should have been a straight-to-video horror movie. And what's even worse is that as time went on, the movie got tedious, dull, and even preposterous at the end. (At least the original succeeded in building some sort of tension). I highly recommend staying away from this movie. Two of my friends left in the middle, another fell asleep, and I asked for my money back. It's the only movie in my life where the audience actually boo'd at the end.
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Hollywood lost in a fog,
By Tom (Toronto) - See all my reviews The 1980 original is not a classic that was beggining to be remade, but I guess having the name of John Carpenter attached, and the current trend of horror remakes (Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Amityville Horror) made this seem like a can't-lose situation. Well, the result is one of the worst films of the year. Twenty minutes into this film, you will know this is a stinker. The basic storyline revolves ghosts exacting revenge on a town via a fog. It is preposterous but at least Carpenter was able to create some effective chills through spooky atmosphere in his version. This remake is not scary; just silly. The cast is uniformly bad. Tom Welling's one good moment involves him taking his shirt off to display his well-toned body. His co-star Maggie Grace is neither charming or appealing. They both come off like models on their first film set. The movie even features a drunken priest - who is drunk in every scene. It's so laughable, although that is not as funny as the scene where a character finds a man frozen in a freezer - and it's clear this character has been locked up overnight - yet he's still alive. It's obvious this film was made for a quick buck. But as box office receipts diminish, Hollywood can only blame itself for being stuck in this rut -- or more appropriately, this fog. If they want to find their way out of it, make some decent movies, and think of something original.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The remake to John Carpenter's 1980 The Fog, is a epic of foggyed up porportions,
By Mike Bolts (Superior, Wi) - See all my reviews |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
The Fog (2005, Rated, Fullscreen)/The Fog (1980, Special Edition) 2-Pk btb by Rupert Wainwright (DVD - 2006)
Out of stock
| ||