Amazon.com: 28 Weeks Later: Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner, Amanda Walker: Amazon Instant Video

28 Weeks Later

3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (268 customer reviews)
28 WEEKS LATER, the follow-up to the hugely successful 28 Days Later, picks up six months after the rage virus has annihilated Mainland Britain. The US army declares that the war against infection has been won, and that the reconstruction of the country can begin.
  • Starring: Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne
  • Directed by: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo
  • Runtime: 1 hour 41 minutes
  • Release year: 2007
  • Studio: Fox Atomic
Play trailer
Also available in HD with Amazon Instant Video on Your TV
 
 
 
 

Amazon Instant Video

48 hour rental

1-Click® $2.99

Buy movie

1-Click® $9.99

Learn more about renting and buying

 
 
 
 
 
 
[Send us Feedback]
Have a promotion code? View Balance
New to Amazon Instant Video? Instantly watch thousands of movies and TV shows. Learn more. Watch on your computer or on your TV with one of our compatible devices.

Buy the Blu-ray and get the Amazon Instant Video Rental See Details
28 Weeks Later [Blu-ray]
Price: $19.99 - Includes the Amazon Instant Video 48 hour rental as a gift with purchase. Available to US Customers Only.
> See additional offers

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details
Synopsis: 28 WEEKS LATER, the follow-up to the hugely successful 28 Days Later, picks up six months after the rage virus has annihilated Mainland Britain. The US army declares that the war against infection has been won, and that the reconstruction of the country can begin.
Starring: Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne
Supporting actors: Jeremy Renner, Amanda Walker, Shahid Ahmed, Harold Perrineau, Catherine McCormack, Garfield Morgan, Emily Beecham, Idris Elba, Beans El-Balawi, Imogen Poots, Chris Ryman, Mackintosh Muggleton, Meghan Popiel, Stewart Alexander, Philip Bulcock, Tristan Tait, William Meredith, Matt Reeves, Thomas Garvey, Tom Bodell
Directed by: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo
Genre: Horror, Thriller
Runtime: 1 hour 41 minutes
Release year: 2007
Studio: Fox Atomic
MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong violence and gore, language and some sexuality/nudity
ASIN: B000YGIHOG (Rental) and B000WZ79OS (Purchase)
Rights & Requirements
Rental rights: 48 hour viewing period Details
Purchase rights: Stream instantly and download to 2 locations. Details
Compatible with: Mac and Windows PC online viewing, compatible instant streaming devices, TiVo DVRs. System requirements
Format: Amazon Instant Video (streaming online video and digital download)

Also available on DVD

28 Weeks Later (Widescreen Edition) DVD ~ Catherine McCormack

3.6 out of 5 stars (268) $9.49

Theatrical Release Information
  • US Theatrical Release Date: May 11, 2007
  • MPAA: Rated R for strong violence and gore, language and some sexuality/nudity
  • Production Company: Fox Atomic, DNA Films, UK Film Council, Figment Films, Sociedad General de Cine (SOGECINE) S.A., Koan Films
  • USA Box Office: $ 28 Million
  • Worldwide Box Office: $ 63 Million
  • Filming Locations: Aldwych Underground Station, Aldwych, Holborn, London, England, UK | Canary Wharf, Isle of Dogs, London, England, UK | Charing Cross Underground Station, Charing Cross, London, England, UK | Charing Cross, London, England, UK | CityPoint, Moorgate, London, England, UK | Dover, Kent, England, UK | Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Isle of Dogs, London, England, UK | Hyde Park, London, England, UK | London, England, UK | Millenium Bridge, River Thames, London, England, UK | Millennium Stadium, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, Wales, UK | Palais de Chaillot, Paris 16, Paris, France | Parliament Square, Westminster, London, England, UK | Shaftesbury Avenue, London, England, UK | Therapia Road, East Dulwich, London, England, UK | Three Mills Studios, Three Mill Lane, Bow, London, England, UK | Trafalgar Square, St James's, London, England, UK | Wembley Stadium, Wembley, London, England, UK

Video Format Details

Online Viewing

PC Download

TiVo box

Portable device

View instantly from any PC or Mac with a broadband connection
Ready to watch in about 40 minutes*
Ready to watch in about 45 minutes*
Ready to transfer in about 40 minutes*
* Your download times may vary--estimates shown are for a typical DSL connection (1.5 Mbits/sec). Rental videos cannot be transferred to a portable device.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


 

Customer Reviews

268 Reviews
5 star:
 (87)
4 star:
 (72)
3 star:
 (45)
2 star:
 (31)
1 star:
 (33)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.6 out of 5 stars (268 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A worthy successor to the original., May 11, 2007
28 Weeks Later... (Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, 2007)

So Alex Garland didn't write the 28 Days Later... sequel, nor did Danny Boyle direct it. I felt a bit better about this after hearing that the reason for both was time issues/contractual obligations (both were involved in the much-anticipated Sunshine when this got off the ground). So they brought in Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (Intacto) to both co-write and direct. I was still a touch leery walking into the theater, but the end result is that the movie was not as good as I'd hoped-- but a great deal better than I expected.

We start off with a group of survivors holed up in a cottage at the beginning of the outbreak (if you saw the original, the opening scene happens, presumably, while Cillian Murphy's character is still in a coma). Two of the people stuck there are Alice (Catherine McCormack) and Don (Robert Carlyle). During dinner one night, there's a pounding on the door, and they admit a young boy (Gary Robert Kelly's favorite actor, Beans El-Balawi). Unfortunately, the infected are hot on his tail, and you can guess the rest. Don escapes. 28 weeks later, the repatriation of Britain begins, and Don's kids Andy (the similarly wonderfully-named Mackintosh Muggleton in his first screen role) and Tammy (V for Vendetta's Imogen Poots) are reunited with him. But, as you know if you've seen thirty seconds of any trailer to the film, maybe they were a bit hasty in bringing people back to the island...

The good news is that Boyle did, in fact, act as second unit director, and directed a few scenes. The bad news, which isn't really so bad, is that it's pretty obvious which scenes they are. While the behind-the-scenes stuff they've been showing on TV singles out Boyle's direction of the opening scene, there are a few others scattered throughout as well. Boyle's adrenaline-rush jump cuts show up now and again, and there's an almost eerie similarity to the first film in those scenes. This is helped along by the fact that the producers used, for all intents and purposes, the same soundtrack John Murphy came up with for the first film, but without the silly happy synthesizer stuff that popped up now and again in that one. (And no uncredited Godspeed You Black Emperor! tracks this time round, either.) That said, Fresnadillo is a strong director in his own right, and he holds his own here. The story is less epic than the first one, with the focus squarely on Don and his kids, along with two army officers who try to help them escape the new outbreak of contagion. This could have easily become a weakness, with such a simple storyline, but Fresnadillo turns it into a strength. There are a lot of places where he could have branched out, and frankly I'd have liked to see some of them, but he kept focus throughout. He also didn't make the usual sequel mistake of showing the monsters too much, sticking to Boyle's original jump-cut plan when the infected get screen time (which is surprisingly little, actually); you get flashes, but with one ugly exception towards the end of the movie, we never get the whole "let's unveil the monster in all its glory" wankery so common in horror films with big effects budgets. (And even in the exception, he keeps it to a minimum and still uses the close-ups that make the infected so scary in the first place.) There were a few times I wished Garland had written the script, but Fresnadillo and his compatriots (who include the BAFTA-nominated Rowan Joffe) did well, for the most part.

The one truly weak point in the movie is that it's all set up very conveniently. You have a basic idea of what's coming from the first big plot twist (or, if you're more observant than I am, about ten minutes into the movie). That said, Fresnadillo still has a trick or two up his sleeve for the big payoff at the end of the movie, and oh, the payoff is so very, very worth it. Everything's set up nicely, and then Fresnadillo and co. sweep everything we think we know off the table.

Now, I know there are a few people who aren't going to like the sequel no matter what because it's a sequel, but in general, if you liked the first one, I think you'll get a kick out of this one, as well. Certainly worth paying matinée price for, even if your matinée pricing just skyrocketed like ours did. ****
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


104 of 125 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The perfect horror sequel, July 19, 2007
By 
trashcanman (Hanford, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (VINE VOICE)   
When I heard that this was coming out, I was not expecting much. The original is arguably THE zombie classic (discounting the hysterical "Shaun of the Dead") of the last decade, but the sequel involved almost none of the original minds that brought us the stark terror of "28 Days Later", which combined the threats of cataclysmic disease and it's deadly effects on the mind which caused those infected by what became known as the "Rage Virus" to viciously and relentlessly attack the uninfected, either killing the victim or spreading the disease. A sequel had potential of course, but it seemed like it would be a by-the-books popcorn affair. Boy, was I wrong.

People complained that the first film started too slowly and was boring for the first twenty minutes; I disagree, but that issue has been addressed nonetheless. The opening sequence flashes back to another group of survivors during the original outbreak. Their fate is one you won't forget; it is startling, chaotic, terrifying, dramatic, hopeless, and heartbreaking, all within one fairly short chain of events. That's when I knew this one was going to be everything I wished it would be and it never let me down. This film is epic and personal, gruesome yet tearful, and manages to give you everything you want, even when you had no clue that you wanted it.

The evolution of the Rage Virus is a fascinating one in that it manages to outlive the death of all of the infected (from starvation) by exploiting a rare gene that allows some people to be carriers of the virus without succumbing to it's effects. The result: even kissing your wife hello could be the catalyst for a new, deadly outbreak. The story kicks in 28 weeks after the infection dies and the US military is overseeing the repopulation of London; or a district of London to be precise. Every possible step is taken to ensure that the horror that was the infection that wiped Great Britain's population clean off the earth is not repeated. Naturally, the virus finds a way. As the crushing mass of humanity flees from the compromised quarantine and the murderous zombies, there is an amazing scene where the rooftop snipers are frantically trying to distinguish the civilians from the infected as they run down a bottlenecked street. The chaos and hopelessness of the situation are palpable as the camera shows us through a soldier's scope just what he is up against in dramatic fashion. The way that these situations of large-scale human terror are turned into personal struggles is what makes this movie a stone cold classic in my mind where it otherwise would have been just another great horror film.

The cinematography impresses as well. There are plenty more of those iconic shots of deserted London that bring back memories of the first film and make me wish I lived there so I could appreciate them more. Another nice touch. And the final shot of the film, while not unexpected, is one that will chill you to the bone and thrill you at the same time.

I've spent significant time trying to think of a horror sequel that surpassed the original so superbly and I honestly can't think of one. The closest would be the original "Dawn of the Dead", but I still prefer "Night of the Living Dead" to "Dawn" so "28 Weeks Later" takes it. This is an absolute take-no-prisoners, hard "R", work of terror that must be viewed by all professing to be horror fans.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Time flies when you're running for your life, June 30, 2008
This review is from: 28 Weeks Later [Blu-ray] (Blu-ray)
There's always that extra obstacle to conquer when making sequels, for the lovers of the first movie the second needs a reason to exist, it has to be real, strong and carry the story further than one could have imagined. I really enjoyed "28 Days Later" because I got to see it in a half empty theater with a friend, and it felt so real and brutal that I walked out with my knees shaking. Then I saw this movie at home and while it still made me cringe I don't think that it was the lack of super sized screen that made the movie feel smaller than the first, somehow as good as it was there were flaws to it that made it hard for me to give it more stars.

Overall I'm glad I saw it, it was scary, bloody, gross, there was lots of close run ins and plenty of super hungry, super fast infected zombies but the little things that allowed the outbreak spread again made me shake my head in disbelief. At one point I was laughing (the scene in the dark at the stadium escalator) because it was so ridiculous and then I was flabbergasted at the bad decisions, like the new kids who arrived at the cleaned now London sneaked out to get something from their old home even thought it was forbidden to leave, they simply took this dramatic stance against everyone's safety as they opened the portals to hell for everyone else. I was surprised to see who was the main carrier of the virus and then who spread it to everyone else, I know the zombies were fast but the so called safe army guarded compound was like kindergarten during an Easter egg hunt, the infected ravaged anyone they pleased and it seemed that even all those weapons and precautions didn't do much to stop the spread.

The movie looked good, I liked the eerie and forlorn mood and it was a good chunk of horror watching on a rainy Sunday but the little bits of stupidity that well, allowed for the sequel to exist were little too much. At the end it left me feeling depressed, so I guess goal accomplished! Not bad but not the greatest although worth the watch for horror fans. I am guessing that if there is another entry it will be called 28 months later, now that would be interesting to see...


- Kasia S.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Production Stills
  • Production Stills:

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Spoiler...missing in this movie.... 0 May 12, 2010
what's next-28______later 10 May 12, 2010
Difference between 28 days later and 28 weeks later. 5 Apr 27, 2010
slipcover 2 Sep 2, 2009
What is this movie??? 1 Jan 31, 2009
What is this movie??? 0 Oct 12, 2007
spanish?? 1 Sep 22, 2007
When will this dvd be released? 1 Jul 9, 2007
See all 10 discussions...  
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Star Trek fans - do you want to see a new Star Trek TV series based on the recent Star Trek movie starring Chris Pine? 146 2 minutes ago
Your Review of the Last Movie You Watched 5208 6 minutes ago
Now that the Harry Potter stories are all written, what kind of stories do you want written now? 30 12 minutes ago
Best Best Picture Winner -- The Game 169 25 minutes ago
Most UNDERrated Modern Directors ~ ❈ ~ Game 62 29 minutes ago
Daily Poll: Feb 23 2012 - Best Hitchcock Blonde 4 34 minutes ago
BBC content disappearing from Amazon Prime streaming? 22 1 hour ago
Petition to Add Wii Streaming Capabilities to Amazon Instant Video 205 5 hours ago
Search Customer Discussions
   
Related forums

By placing your order, you agree to our Terms of Use.  Sold by Amazon Digital Services, Inc.  Additional taxes may apply.
Amazon Video On Demand Privacy Statement Amazon Video On Demand Shipping Information Amazon Video On Demand Returns & Exchanges