Customer Reviews


10 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Huh?
I find I need this for hearing loss in one ear and tinnitus in that same ear. This device works as advertised, amplifying sounds. All sounds. So shirt noise, skin moving - all these factors become much more important. The diaphragm equivalent is curved, which i hate - it lets in background noise and tends to slip. The clarity of the traditional stethescope is (was,...
Published on December 3, 2009 by Kenneth LeCroy

versus
24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars If Cardiology II is goldstandard, than the 3000 gets 3 stars
If compared to what I think is the best acoustic stethoscope overall (the Littmann Cardiology and Cardiology II), than the 3000 has advantages and disadvantages. On the flip side, the 3000 has a very sleek, non-chill, easy-to-clean/desinfect and an always "seal-with-the-skin" diaphragm with the convenience to switch from "diaphragm-mode" to "bell-mode" and back with a...
Published on March 26, 2009 by A. Westib


Most Helpful First | Newest First

24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars If Cardiology II is goldstandard, than the 3000 gets 3 stars, March 26, 2009
If compared to what I think is the best acoustic stethoscope overall (the Littmann Cardiology and Cardiology II), than the 3000 has advantages and disadvantages. On the flip side, the 3000 has a very sleek, non-chill, easy-to-clean/desinfect and an always "seal-with-the-skin" diaphragm with the convenience to switch from "diaphragm-mode" to "bell-mode" and back with a button without the need of turning the chestpiece. Also advantagious is that you don't have to watch the pressure you put on the chestpiece in "bell-mode", which is essential in an acoustic steth. So much to the pros!
Now, the down side is that it needs a battery, it won't withstand physical abuse (e.g. ground fall), it is amplifying everything and not only the noise you want to hear, which puts it's purpose ad absurdum. The heartsounds are not as crisp, e.g. not as easy to hear a splitted S1, always a background noise that can actually immitate a murmur and expensive. Every single contact of fingers, gowns, cables etc. with the chestpiece is mercilessly beeing transferred to your ears. It feels light, almost cheap and is not ment to be made to follow your carreer over 35 years and more. So, inferior in acoustic and inferior in design/make gives the 3000 only 3 stars.

Off note, I think that the quality of the Cardiology III and the Master is not as good as Cardiology/Cardiology II either. Littmann has changes the bell shape in the III, the tuneable diaphragm is nonsens and the Master sounds muffled with or without pressure on the chestpiece.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Good, but get the Littmann 3100, March 22, 2010
As a nurse, I've used my Littmann 3000 stethoscope for almost 2 years on a regular basis. I just recently upgraded to the Littmann 3100 and the difference is substantial. Here's a comparison of the two products:

Littmann 3000
PROS: The stethoscope is very durable and lightweight with good construction that's very easy to clean. It magnifies heart/lung/bowel sounds very well and allows you to easily adjust between volumes, bell/diaphragm modes. It shuts off automatically after 3 minutes from the last button push. You can also program the starting volume using the provided directions.

CONS: For some unknown reason, they made the chest piece slightly rounded in a convex shape rather than flat. Because the diaphragm bulges out towards the patient, it is very difficult to keep it flat and still against the patient's skin (especially on thin, elderly or pediatric patients). The shifting causes scratchy artifact sounds that can be hard to distinguish from lung crackles. It also picks up all little movements of your fingers/hand/tube/surface, etc. The other less significant issues include: the a small start up period from the time you turn it on to when you're actually able to listen through it, which can be frustrating in urgent situations; it doesn't tell you when the battery is low (it just doesn't turn on); it takes AAA batteries which are harder to find in a bind; and you have to use a coin/screwdriver to open the battery chamber.

When I got the Littmann 3100, I didn't know if it would fix these issues but I've been extremely pleased with the improvements and even the upgrades, making it well worth the price.

PROS: The new model has a flat, wider diaphragm that fixes the artifact sound problems and is able to magnify sound even more. It also does a better job of limiting ambient noises from your hands/tube. That in itself makes it worth it. The new power button turns it on immediately and there are multiple auto-on/off/standby modes to choose from, so no more wait time. The LCD screen is an excellent feature and shows you volume, battery life, bell vs. diaphragm modes, and also displays the patient's pulse. The battery chamber now opens by twisting without requiring tools and uses a single AA battery. The construction is again excellent and sturdy but lightweight and flexible.

Overall, the Littmann 3100 is a vast improvement over the 3000 model and can be purchased for roughly the same price at various medical supply websites. I strongly recommend either of these stethoscopes for anyone that wants to hear better or has significant hearing loss like I do.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Huh?, December 3, 2009
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I find I need this for hearing loss in one ear and tinnitus in that same ear. This device works as advertised, amplifying sounds. All sounds. So shirt noise, skin moving - all these factors become much more important. The diaphragm equivalent is curved, which i hate - it lets in background noise and tends to slip. The clarity of the traditional stethescope is (was, in my case) much better - so this product is not for ANYONE that can hear normally. It is only for us old guys that listened to music too loud. Having said all those negative things, I have used mine for a year, changed the battery only 3 times, and it has no signs of wear despite 40 plus hours a week on my neck. The button to turn it on could be bigger, and lose the curve, and have the thing remember the volume level you set it at last time and then this might be a product to be desired, not just settled for. Wow, I sound so negative. Oh well.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars It's a good item., February 12, 2010
By 
Marcelo Melo (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
It's really usefull. But, some points could be better. For example, I don't think the Ambient Noise Reduction works very well, I still hear a lot of sounds I didn't want to. Besides, the tube, not only the diaphragm, is a source of amplified sound, what maximizes the interference. But it works well in amplifying difficult-to-hear heart sounds, mainly in a quiet place. I liked it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars High quality, 1 frustration, January 16, 2011
By 
La Jolla ER physician (La Jolla, CA, CA USA) - See all my reviews
This captures sounds very well in a noisy emergency department. However, I can only store ONE RECORDING AT A TIME. This is frustrating, especially since insight is gained from comparing areas of the heart. Whoever designed this did not put enough thought into how it would actually be used. I am actually going to buy the Thinklabs stethoscope instead.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Noise supressing stethoscopy, Litmann 3100, March 9, 2010
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
The product is wonderful, probably the best stethoscope I have owned.

It was backordered through the Amazon.com supplier so I had to reorder through a different supplier.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent buy, April 19, 2008
Do you hear a lot of dimished LS, well now you wont. Its fantastic.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars You're joking!, October 3, 2008
The Littman 3000 is NOT $749!! You can get it anywhere for less than $300. Most places it's around $260.

Shame on you, Amazon!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Must be a joke!, May 16, 2009
By 
DnpVik (edmonds, wa United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: 3M Littmann 3000 Electronic Stethoscope, 29" (Health and Beauty)
This stethoscope is definitely not $749. Usually under $300. I just bought mine for $229. Absolutely ridiculus price here.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Stethoscope, June 30, 2010
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Took so long to be delivered.

First contact with seller the communication from them was very poor.After the second email the things were settled.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product