Most Helpful Customer Reviews
63 of 73 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Just plain stupid, September 24, 2007
I'm not sure what has happened to Stephen Hunter's work. I really enjoyed "Point of Impact" and "Dirty White Boys" is a great book. But in this, Bob has changed completely. He does his research on Japan by watching old samurai movies and seems to wish to fight much better trained individuals with a sword to prove a point. This is rationalised as being more sensible to use a sword than to carry a gun in Japan. As Sam Vincent observed in "Point of Impact" the essence of Bob was his practicality,and we see none of this here. The most sensible thing for a world class sniper would be to find a rifle somewhere in Japan and shoot the bad guys from a 1000 yards out (take it from me, they have it coming). Rather than letting Bob get cut to shreds, Hunter stretches reality enough that Bob learns swordfighting in a few days, enough to fight 4 trained swordsmen successfully, and to give somebody who was described as a kendo prodigy a very hard time. It is frankly ridiculous. In addition Hunter's knowledge of unarmed combat is poor... I think he just making it up. The dialogue and plot are risible. The characters are paper thin, and the observations about Japan and the Japanese are at best ignorant, at worst borderline racist. But the most irritating thing for me is the fact that it is inconsistent with previous books and with itself. For example Bob's daughter is supposed to be 23. But he is supposed to have met her mother in 1993. This sort of sloppiness is just annoying. Very disappointed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
41 of 49 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
good elements, but gaping holes, September 23, 2007
Imagine the next Swagger novel after The 47th Ronin, as this should perhaps have been titled. The evil villain has never held a gun, but after a week of training, is able to become a world-class sniper and beats Swagger on Swagger's own turf. The villain is in good shape, but is 80 years old. "Absurd!", you say, and rightly. It's not enough to learn about different rifles and loads, your mind and muscles need to develop instincts. The 80-year old newbie world-class sniper must face situations such as the following: for a particular rifle and load, the target is 850 yards away and 50 yards lower. He's at an altitude of 6500 feet. It's 33 degrees and snowing lightly, with a humidity of 85%. If the target is due north, the wind is blowing from the northwest at 10 mph. How much do you allow for windage? How much bullet drop? All of the factors mentioned here must be taken into account--learning these will take years, not a week. Could someone who has never played golf learn enough in a week to beat Tiger Woods in the US Open? The major problem with the book is that it asks you to believe that Swagger, 60 years old with a gimpy leg, can become a world-class samurai swordsman in a week. Even Hunter has his characters suggest that you cannot learn enough in a week to become good. But Hunter has nonetheless locked himself into this theme. Swagger first beats the junior champion of all Japan, then takes on 6 veteran swordsmen who are 20 years younger all at once and beats them all, and then...well, it gets worse. You can argue that Swagger isn't really "world-class"--but if you're consistently beating world-class swordsmen, then what are you? There are reviewers who say that this seems to push belief a bit, but you can put that aside. But this is the central theme of the book--Hunter might just as well have given Swagger the ability to fly like Superman or make himself invisible. So, as a story, the book gets a 2 star rating. I think also of Mifune's character in the movie Red Sun (with Charles Bronson, et al)--Mifune kills flying mosquitos with his sword. An exaggeration, perhaps, but not by much. How can you learn enough in a week to do that? If you ignore the story and forget about the problems of having Swagger become world-class in a week, you can concentrate on the good qualities of the book. There are lots of details about Japanese swords and sword-making, and there is a tribute to samurai culture and traditions. You'll learn a lot about samurai movies: Hunter gives a very good account of these--so one more star for this aspect of the book. A fourth star is awarded for Hunter's honoring Ivan Morris' excellent work The Nobility of Failure. There's a strange dichotomy: how can Hunter get so much right, and at the same time get so much wrong? For me, it is these tributes that made the book worthwhile and enjoyable--without them I would have donated it to my local library. For further reading and viewing: The Seven Samurai is perhaps the greatest of the samurai movies, but it's not so much about the samurai traditions. For traditions and culture, the Samurai Trilogy, with Mifune in the title role portraying the life of Musashi, and Harakiri are excellent--Hunter repeatedly refers to these movies in the book. For books, Morris' The Nobility of Failure should not be missed: this book plays an important role in Hunter's book. Yoshikawa's Musashi should also be read. Also--John Allyn's book The 47 Ronin Story, and the movies Chushingura and The Loyal 47 Ronin. For a very well-written contrast on the years it takes to become a good swordsman, try Dave Lowry's excellent biography Autumn Lightning.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
32 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
I would have quit half way thru if it wasn't a Hunter, September 20, 2007
I see a disappointing trend in Stephen Hunter's writing. In Havana, Hunter was obviously very interested in 1950's Cuba and Castro at the time. It felt like he wanted to write a story about it but threw poor Earl Swagger in it just to please his fans. The results were bad, one of his worst books. I'm sad to say the 47th Samurai is the same deal. Hunter even admits in his acknowledgments that he totally got into the whole Samurai thing and initially wanted to write a story set in ancient times involving rival clans or something. Instead he wrote a modern samurai story and threw poor Bob Lee in it to please his fans. Again, bad move. I was really excited when the book opens with Earl's adventures on Iwo - it's what I've been waiting for all these years. It's only a very small portion of the book though. Bob Lee just does NOT belong in this book. It never "felt" like the real Bob the Nailer. He doesn't even hold a gun once in this book! Mr. Hunter - if you want to branch out and get away from gun heavy thrillers, that's fine. Just don't try to squeeze the Swaggers into a story that doesn't fit them. I've been waiting for a page turner like Dirty White Boys for a long time. Unfortunately, the 47th Samurai isn't it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|