Start reading 500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Read books on your computer or other mobile devices with our FREE Kindle Reading Apps.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars [Kindle Edition]

Kurt Eichenwald
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (123 customer reviews)

Print List Price: $30.00
Kindle Price: $11.04 includes free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: $18.96 (63%)
Sold by: Simon and Schuster Digital Sales Inc

Whispersync for Voice

Now you can switch back and forth between reading the Kindle book and listening to the Audible audiobook. Learn more

Add the professional narration of 500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars for a reduced price of $12.99 after you buy this Kindle book.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $11.04  
Hardcover $20.22  
Paperback $13.98  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $26.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Best Books of the Month
Best of the Month
Amazon's editors selected this title as one of the Best Books of the Month. See our current Editors' Picks.

Book Description

Kurt Eichenwald—New York Times bestselling author of Conspiracy of Fools and The Informant— recounts the first 500 days after 9/11 in a comprehensive, compelling page-turner as gripping as any thriller.

In 500 Days, master chronicler Kurt Eichenwald lays bare the harrowing decisions, deceptions, and delusions of the eighteen months that changed the world forever, as leaders raced to protect their citizens in the wake of 9/11.

Eichenwald’s gripping, immediate style and trueto- life dialogue puts readers at the heart of these historic events, from the Oval Office to Number 10 Downing Street, from Guantanamo Bay to the depths of CIA headquarters, from the al-Qaeda training camps to the torture chambers of Egypt and Syria. He reveals previously undisclosed information from the terror wars, including never before reported details about warrantless wiretapping, the anthrax attacks and investigations, and conflicts between Washington and London.

With his signature fast-paced narrative style, Eichenwald— whose book, The Informant, was called “one of the best nonfiction books of the decade” by The New York Times Book Review—exposes a world of secrets and lies that has remained hidden for far too long.


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

Amazon Best Books of the Month, September 2012: Initially, Eichenwald (The Informant) planned to write a post-9/11 analysis of the second Bush presidency, until he realized that most of the events that set the stage for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the War on Terror--the "decisions, deceptions, and delusions"--happened in the first 18 months after the attacks. This fast-paced narrative of those 553 days takes readers inside CIA headquarters, 10 Downing Street, al-Qaeda training camps, Egyptian torture chambers, and secret prisons. Deeply researched but written like an international spy thriller, Eichenwald's book shows how decisions prompted by fear, hatred, and paranoia created a post-9/11 history "shaped by the experiences of the powerless." --Neal Thompson

Review

“An epic narrative....It may be his best book yet.” (Vanity Fair)

“With the pacing of a suspense novel, award-winning journalist Eichenwald’s richly researched account … [is] a breathtaking inspection of the war on terror that began on 9/11 and reverberates to this day.” (Booklist (starred review))

“Gripping . . . both a page-turning read and an insightful dissection of 9/11’s dark legacy" (Publishers Weekly (starred review))

“A blow-by-blow, episodic reconstruction of the fallout from 9/11 in the highest spheres of terrorist strategy … demonstrating literally how the anti-terrorist hysteria in the United States, and the hatred of America and general global paranoia, forged the ’trauma that haunts the world to this day.’” (Kirkus Reviews)

“Eichenwald is a master at making complicated stories easily understood....[500 Days is] a page-turner because of his journalistic attention to detail. Readers get fly-on-the-wall accounts as Bush administration officials weigh life-and-death decisions.” (Washington Post)

“Thorough reporting and crisp writing . . . Moves at the pace of a movie-ready thriller.” (Dallas Morning News)

“Illuminating and entertaining throughout.” (PARADE magazine)

“An ambitious undertaking and a valuable resource. . . . [Eichenwald] brings home the fundamental rashness and recklessness of the American response to the Sept. 11 attack.” (New York Times Book Review)

“Who really made the decision to go to war in Iraq, and how grounded in fact were the "facts" fed to the American public? The author gives us not a seat at the table but an awfully good listening post to the decisions that changed the world.” (Asbury Park Press and Home News Tribune (NJ))

Product Details


Customer Reviews

A very informative book that was well written and thouroughly researched. John D. Canoles  |  26 reviewers made a similar statement
This book is easy to read and hard to put down. Sam Hasler  |  10 reviewers made a similar statement
Unfortunately, this one had just too much of an underlying anti-administration/republican tone. trekker gal  |  4 reviewers made a similar statement
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
127 of 143 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Which is both good and bad (but mostly good). Kurt Eichenwald's (you know him as the former NYT reporter and author of "The Informant") new book here is no snooze fest. The story is riveting, fast paced and a real page-turner. Eichenwald's writing comes alive, and honestly at times you forget you are reading a well-researched scholarly history of that period, and think you are reading Grisham.

We have a cast of thousands here, but of course GWB and Tony Blair get top billing. However, their errors and missteps are spotlighted here as well as their other policy decisions. Odd terms like "Enemy Combatant" are penned so that "extraordinary rendition" can be carried out.

This book has it all- secrets, spies, military tribunals, torture, waterboarding, anthrax, bombings, and of course Gitmo.

Many secrets are revealed, the backstory is fascinating. Did you know that while Blair was telling Bush that the UK would support the invasion of Iran, the UK top legal advisor was telling Blair that the attack was illegal?

Sometimes a bit dark and disturbing, but it's all the truth.
Was this review helpful to you?
69 of 82 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars "BREATHTAKING, CHILLING, HAUNTING!" September 11, 2012
Format:Hardcover
As I decided if I could possibly read through this book, without the actual Nightmares of 9/11, maybe this chilling read won't affect me as bad as the Tragic day itself. I was wrong, of course most of us would suffer the horrifying flashbacks of a dark legacy that will forever haunt this country. Putting aside what we all experienced in our personal loss, sadness and fear, I began to read through the pages, which reads like a suspenseful thriller that's composed of extensive research. Bestselling author, Kurt Eichenwald delivers a comprehensive, chilling account of the first 500 days after 9/11. He reveals all the horror of the 18 months that changed America forever in gripping details of terrorist strategy, decisions that were made, and shocking information on investigations and conflict. In addition, he reports on wire tapping, the CIA, training camps and disturbing torture chambers. The author also includes historic events that took place in a world of secrets and lies. This is a compelling, comprehensive page-turner of inspection, deception and terror that will make us think, long after this book is closed. Thrilling, breathtaking, and Heartfelt from the beginning to the end!
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
28 of 36 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
This is a very unusual book in what it achieves. First, what it is not. If you are interested in this topic and have read some of the prominent earlier books, you may find nothing new of significance (I didn't). And if you are looking for an introduction, there is probably too much that is silently skipped.

What it does very well is to create a strong gut feeling for the many failings of the US response, due to incompetence, arrogance, carelessness, ideology that rejected evidence,... The book is written in the style of a thriller, popping back and forth between story lines. I found it a very fast-paced read that constantly drew me forward. Even if you are familiar with the events, you are still likely to find the book very readable because of its organization and approach. However, the problem with this approach is seen in the description of the response to the anthrax attack: It is abbreviated far past the point of losing its essential character. Plus, it was so peripheral that I can't see how it belongs in this book.

A big limitation of the fast-paced style is that it precludes analysis and insights into why something happened. For example, an extended analysis of the misconceptions about the "Manchester Manual" is consigned to the "Notes and Sources" appendix (pp 545-552). Advice: Read it -- it is a critical part of the story. One of my biggest frustrations with the accounts -- this and others -- is that I haven't seen a remotely satisfying explanation of why the CIA didn't have qualified, experienced interrogators as part of its normal course-of-business. Or why the military did not use experienced interrogators from the Reserves -- predominantly from civilian law enforcement -- despite the Reserves being explicitly structured to preserve and provide that capability.

In the Epilogue I was taken aback to read passages that were in direct conflict with what was in the preceding chapters. For example, rather than "struggling to find a proper balance between national security and legal rights" (pg 508), the lawyers of the Bush Administration used the crisis to push an extreme interpretation of "The Unified Executive", and abrogated basic rights, such as warrants for searches even though they could provide no example or even a reasonable argument why the existing FISA procedures weren't adequate. And, as the book shows, after persistently failing to even try to sort out the innocent from the guilty, these lawyers put their efforts into blocking attempts to make them do so. My assumption is that the author was attempting to placate some of his sources by being able to point to these passages, deflecting them from what was written earlier. However, I couldn't help but wonder if he hadn't also shaded (softened) what was in the earlier chapters to manage his relationship with those sources.

I have serious problems with the sourcing of the claims that the waterboarding of KSM provided actionable intelligence: It is listed simply as a CIA report with no assessment of its credibility. The book had already mentioned that there were multiple instance of the CIA taking credit for information obtained by others (especially the FBI). The reality was that the CIA and the Bush Administration were repeatedly and consistently caught in deceptions and outright lies about what information had been produced by waterboarding. And about the efficacy of waterboarding: They initially claimed that a single session caused the subject to immediately reveal all. Then it was a few sessions. Then 40. Then 183. Then that although waterboarding didn't directly produce intelligence, it had made KSM more compliant to subsequent interrogation. With only a small part of this extensive history in the book, how is the reader to judge whether this CIA report is credible or just more self-serving lies? Granted there were too many major deceptions and lies during this period to expect the book to even touch on most of them, but this was a big enough part of events and of the book to expect a more critical presentation.

In summary, I have very divided feeling about this book. I love the way that it gives the reader a strong _impression_ of these events, but I dislike how its focus hides that these are but _representative_ stories and that there was a much bigger picture.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars Informative and enjoyable
Good and informative story presented in a compelling manner.

It points out the price associated a country acting on the emotions of the moment along with the costs... Read more
Published 1 day ago by MatthewJ
3.0 out of 5 stars Informative, but reads like a history book.
I am plodding my way through this book. I am learning so much I never knew, but I can only read it for so long and then I think I'm going to be tested on Monday. Read more
Published 6 days ago by Jeanne Silver
5.0 out of 5 stars Kurt certainly had the details
Although I was aware of a lot of the facts of the aftermath of 9-11 it was still a great read. I know that this will not be a favorite reading for the fans of the W Bush.
Published 13 days ago by woodstock947
5.0 out of 5 stars Usual Great Job
Always a pleasure to read Kurt Eichenwald. This book is an excellent view on the people, philosophies and events that are largely responsible for the continuing military and... Read more
Published 13 days ago by Brian P. Hodson
4.0 out of 5 stars Good insider insight
Very interesting read and surprising, about the inside backstabbing, done by all. A bit surprising, how out of control things were.
Published 15 days ago by buddyblue
5.0 out of 5 stars How Did This Mess Happen?
Great review of the personalities of the George W. Bush administration. Denotes the problems generated when lawyers are engaged in decision making vice rendering legal opinions.
Published 15 days ago by Edward J. Shanahan, Jr.
4.0 out of 5 stars Things we need to know...only sooner
So much to know and so late coming. The question is, "Why no trial for war crimes?". They new and yet after thousands of lives lost there is no accounting.. Read more
Published 18 days ago by james brady
1.0 out of 5 stars Redundant
This chronicle becomes bogged down with the legal aspects and the fabric of protecting the homeland is lost. didn't finish the book
Published 19 days ago by rover63
4.0 out of 5 stars What really happened in the war on terror
An excellent account of the behind the scenes activities with war on terror including the enhanced interrogation techniques and extraordinary rendition.
Published 20 days ago by Peter M Marcus
4.0 out of 5 stars Exhaustive, gripping and all true!
The book documents, informs and illustrates that fiction is no match for the truth. I expect it to become compulsory reading for any student of US and world history.
Published 20 days ago by vp
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Book Extras from the Shelfari Community

(What's this?)

To add, correct, or read more Book Extras for 500 Days , visit Shelfari, an Amazon.com company.


More About the Author

Kurt Eichenwald has written about Wall Street for The New York Times since 1987. He began investigating the Prudential scandal in 1989 and, in 1993, took a leave from his daily Market Place column to investigate Prudential Bache full time. His efforts yielded Serpent on the Rock and a Publisher's Award from the Times.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?



Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


So You'd Like to...


Create a guide

Look for Similar Items by Category