Customer Reviews

68 AD

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

From June of 68 through July of 69, five men wore the imperial purple of a Roman Emperor! It was obviously a year of complexity and civil strife in Rome and throughout the Empire. Obviously that would make a great tale and I went into DG Bellenger's work hoping that that would be the case with this small, independently released work.

How wrong I was.

The novel opens with the suicide of Nero and the subsequent rise of Galba to the throne in Rome. However, the only thing the author gets right about Galba's rise to the leadership of Rome is his refusal to pay the Praetorian Guard their promised donative afterwards. With that, the historical accuracy in this novel stops. Nothing of Otho's true actions are brought up, such as Otho's journey to Rome at the same time as Galba. Otho is always there as far as the author is concerned, secretly leading a rebellion against Galba and then his "son" named "Valarian". And then all of a sudden, no, he's in Egypt instrumenting the rebellion, not Rome afterall. Silly me.

Galba is then murdered in the forum. Right afterwards, Galba's "son" named "Valarian" is made emperor by the soldiers and senators who are left after just two people, Valarian and Lucius, an army general, wipe out almost two hundred soldiers and senators single-handedly. Having an emperor Valarian 185 years before he actually led Rome was also an interesting departure from the real history.

I forced myself to finish the book, having spent twenty dollars for it and wanting to get my money's worth. Bellinger's use of dialogue throughout the novel is downright ridiculous and unbelievable in light of the events in the novel while the dialogue is taking place.

For instance, Lucius is wounded in an attempt at Emperor Valarian's life and carries on a several minute conversation with the would-be assassin, rather than tackling her and either killing her, or wrestling her away from the scene. The dialogue is childish and characterization throughout the book is very shallow because of it.

It becomes obvious that the author made up her story as she went along. There is a good amount of action throughout, but there is no transition between events and we learn later on about characters in depth that already showed up several chapters before.

For example, we learn a lot about "Datrium" the second time he appears rather than the first time, and the author almost basically says "and oh yeah, he was that one guy in the amphitheater who asked Lucius that one preplanned question way back when."

In addition to all of this, the book's editor and obviously the author do not know about a possessive apostrophe and when to use one and when not to. The cover art is also wrong! The book's title is 68 AD and there's the Coliseum! I guess if the Emperor Valarian can exist 185 years early, the Coliseum can exist a couple years early!

I'd love to reccommend a book besides this one dealing with the same specific time and specific Emperors, but as far as historical fiction is concerned, I am at a loss right now. Certainly there are numerous nonfiction books on this subject as well. But save your money on this one and try out one the books mentioned on my twenty-five book list of some "Great Greek, Roman and Medieval Fiction."

I think that this book would have benifitted greatly from a good editing, but still found it easy to read and follow. I'm no post-Nero historian, but found the plot plausible and the characters mostly likable(if underdeveloped), although the dialog often seemed forced. I'll read the second one and hope to see improvement in these areas. All in all, I would recommend it...

A vivid setting and unique characters compliment this turbulent roller coaster ride of love, betrayal and political turmoil. It is a story of true perseverance in the face of chaos. I hope to read more.

I've read many historical novels set in Roman history, without a doubt this is the worst. Although I love reading these type of novels, this one was so bad I finally gave up about halfway through. With all due respect to the other reviews, this is one of the most ridiculous excuses for a book that I have ever had the sad experience to encounter. Just awful!!

After Nero's death, there was much chaos and confusion in the Roman government. The author has taken this period in history and woven it into an adventuress novel.

Valarian struggles both mentally and physically to retain the throne and be a good emporor after elected. His father, emperor of a few days, has been assassinated. Valarian seeks revenge on those responisble. At ths same time those who killed his father want to take the throne for themselves.

The author goes into detail and fleshes out her characters quite well. She is able to put you right into the middle of the action and creates situations that would have likely happened in that period of Roman history. I enjoyed the story very much and thought the ending quite unusal.

My girlfiend made me read "68 AD". I haven't read any fiction for about 10+ years. WOW. The book is alive. It really is good! I want more!

With only a few twists on 'real' history, these are realistic people, in realistic situations!

I expect this "68 AD" to be made into a big budget motion picture

A magnificent depiction of the Roman Empire as it really was, full of treachery and deceit as men let their ambition exceed their morals. Of course there was time for romance and the occasional dismemberment of Roman nobility. This book kept me constantly enthralled; each new development shed new light on the conspiracy that captivated me from the first page. The spiritual ending brought closure and made it an all around good read. Thank You!
Recommendation: HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
Ashley H. is a reviewer Poet and content editor.