9-11 [Paperback]

Noam Chomsky (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 1583224890 | ISBN-13: 978-1583224892 | Publication Date: December 4, 2001 | Edition: 1

In 9-11, Noam Chomsky comments on the September 11th attacks, the new war on terrorism, Osama bin Laden, U.S. involvement with Afghanistan, media control, and the long-term implications of America's military attacks abroad. Informed by his deep understanding of the gravity of these issues and the global stakes, 9-11 demonstrates Chomsky's impeccable knowledge of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and South Asia, and sheds light on the rapidly shifting balance of world power. Speaking out against escalating violence, Chomsky critically examines the United States' own foreign policy record and considers what international institutions might be employed against underground networks and national states accused of terrorism. 9-11's analysis still stands as a measure of how well the media is able to serve its role of informing the citizenry, so crucial to our democracy in times of war.

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

MIT-based Chomsky revolutionized linguistics in the late Fifties, but for nearly as long he has been better known as an energetic and constructive debunker of American establishment politics and behavior. However, the current Chomsky contributes nothing to the legacy he established decades ago. These two most recent productions do not reveal systematic efforts to sustain or develop any aspect of his prolifically expressed critique; indeed, they are not so much authored as collaged, with Chomsky's sanction, from talks, after-talk Q&As, and interviews with generally converted interlocutors. Understanding Power draws mainly on vintage utterances from the Nineties, and its most penetrating passage takes on, of all pressing matters, literary theory. Chomsky, who is relentless in condemning the media as incapable of any function other than converting the masses to elite desires, just as relentlessly samples mainstream reporting sources for instances of corporate and government ill doings. In trying to illustrate that he is not a crude conspiracy theorist, he conveys the opposite impression. The shorter 9-11 could not have been planned, of course, though it mostly consists of interviews conducted while the calendar still read September, suggesting both the urgency Chomsky felt to get his perspective on the record and his utter disinclination to reexamine any of his cemented opinions about world affairs. Chomsky condemns the attacks specifically and then suggests that the deaths are entirely the responsibility of capitalist globalization, which nonetheless he asserts is irrelevant to the September 11 actors. However, consistency is even less a priority for Chomsky than humility. Apparently, Chomsky believes that he has discovered the concept of blowback, not to mention imbalance in coverage of the perpetual Israeli-Palestinian murder-and-misery fetish. For him, a direct line runs from Reagan's mining of Nicaragua's harbors to the flying of commercial airliners into buildings. 9-11 is a worthwhile purchase for public libraries intent on demonstrating (or risking) balance; Understanding Power is not half as useful as Chomsky's earlier, authentic innovations in political literature, especially Manufacturing Consent (coauthored with Edward Herman). Libraries truly wishing to ensure representation of the most lucid nonconventional opinion should first check that their subscriptions to the Nation a proud carrier of Chomsky for 40 years are current. Scott H. Silverman, Bryn Mawr Coll. Lib., PA
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

Review

Chomsky's latest book,..."9-11,"... is a badly needed corrective to news coverage of the present-day "war on terrorism." -- Review by Norman Solomon on Common Dreams website

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 128 pages
• Publisher: Open Media/Seven Stories Press; 1 edition (December 4, 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1583224890
• ISBN-13: 978-1583224892
• Product Dimensions: 5 x 0.4 x 7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (162 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #604,286 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston. A member of the American Academy of Science, he has published widely in both linguistics and current affairs. His books include At War with Asia, Towards a New Cold War, Fateful Triangle: The U. S., Israel and the Palestinians, Necessary Illusions, Hegemony or Survival, Deterring Democracy, Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy and Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

77 of 93 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars There is an Alternative, February 14, 2002

By 

Douglas Doepke (Claremont, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: 9-11 (Paperback)

Americans have a right to be mad-as-hell, but no right to bomb-the-hell out of anyone else. Nor do our politicians have the right to declare open-ended war against any country of their choosing. It's hard to keep perspective following an atrocity like the twin towers, but keep perspective we must if we are not to repeat the same slaughter of innocents as the perpetrators of the attack. Applying standards of procedural justice is crucial to a fair and effective reckoning. The atrocity should be treated as a crime against humanity, not as an opportunity to launch aggression against entries on an administration hit-list. As an international crime, the machinery of world justice should be brought to bear on the perpetrators wherever they may be hiding. They should be tried and punished in a world court of law, not in the dog cages of Guantanamo. What's good enough for victims in Kosovo should be good enough for victims in New York. The alternative, to wage war against suspect coutries without clear standards or honest diplomatic effort, will only prolong the suffering, create more enemies, and militarize our society. Is the unhobbled supremacy of Corporate America worth that price.

Chomsky makes the case in clear and consistent terms, refusing at the same time to undergo an historical lobotomy as prescribed by the president. Nor is the irony of an architect of global terrorism declaring war on itself lost on the author. Probably no word in our lifetime is now so exploited as that tortured term. Despite media filtration, there is an alternative, as Chomsky shows, to the present destructive course and its fog of misdirected jingoism. Though a quickie and somewhat disjointed booklet, 9-11 presents the kind of perspective unavailable in the mainstream, and for that reason should be read. The urgency becomes even greater as Bush and Company plot more conquests, more adventures, and more weapons of destruction, leading to who knows where. Though the president and his bullies would force a choosing of sides, there remains a more civilized path. The global community must insist upon it.

23 of 26 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars typical chomsky for the most part, August 18, 2002

By 

"fug666" (Crookston, MN United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: 9-11 (Paperback)

This is another one of those Chomsky books that comes from a number of interviews done with Chomsky. It only has interviews conducted in September and early October so there's not much in it in regards to the "war on terrorism." It has a lot of the usual information that Chomsky gives out about America's role in different areas of the world and how that could easily be seen as "blowback" in what happened on 9-11.

He discusses a lot of the legal ways we could go after terrorists, but as we all know, that hasn't been done. He points out all the things Nicaragua tried in attempts to alleviate American terrorism on their soil (Nicaragua went to the World Court, which ruled in their favor, ordering the US to desist and pay substantial reparations, but of course the US dismissed the court judgement and responded with an immediate escalation of the attack. Nicaragua then went to the Security Council, which considered a resolution calling on states to observe international law. The US alone vetoed it. Then they went to the General Assembly, where they got a similar resolution passed with the US and Israel opposed two years in a row).

He brings up one issue that I hadn't heard about and that's how humanitarian aid was being affected very early on. In quoting the NY Times he stated,"Washington has also demanded (from Pakistan) a cutoff of fuel supplies...and the elimination of truck convoys that provide much of the food and other supplies to Afghanistan's civilian population." He brings up numerous reports from NGOs that called the "humanitarian airdrops" things like "a propaganda ploy rather than a way to get aid to Afghans who really need help" and that air strikes "had halted the only means of getting large volumes of food to Afghans--overland truck convoys" of the WFP.

One other interesting point he brings up is America's attempts to censor the Arab-speaking world's only uncensored news source--Al-Jazeera.

It's not a book full of new information (although some of it may well be for some--it is full of stuff that isn't often discussed in our mainstream press, but stuff that you'll have probably read if you've read much of Chomsky), but basically presents the case for a peaceful way to fight terrorism and what America's done to receive this "blowback."

66 of 81 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Katie Couric's head would spin!, January 22, 2002

By 

Sylvester Plath (United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: 9-11 (Paperback)

In other words, this is not the stuff of NBC News. I begin with a quote from the book:
"Nothing can justify the crimes such as those of September 11th, but we can think of the United States as an 'innocent victim' only if we adopt the convenient path of ignoring the record of it's actions and those of it's allies, which are, after all, hardly a secret(p 35)."
This short book is a transcript of email conversations with Chomsky. Many who are not familiar with Chomsky's work may be too quick to call him callous due to his style. He is not one to overzealously repeat obligatory statements so as to appease and pacify possible critics who would question his patriotism. Instead, Chomsky wishes to illustrate the "B-side" of the current crisis which is often bankrupt in most media.
Crucial premises among his talks include the idea that the U.S. did not take the legal route towards our response to 9-11 becuase it would lead to questions about the recent history of U.S terrorism (he gives a sampling) as defined by U.S. Codes and organizations such as the World Court. He discusses the comparability of 9-11 with other U.S. created disasters such as the Al-Shifa plant in Sudan (with it's resulting death count reaching into the tens of thousands). Interestingly, he discusses U.S. intelligence failures that may have led to the prevention of 9-11, such as Clinton's refusal (due, according to the CIA, to his "irrational hatred" of the country) to accept Sudan's critical information regarding many members of the Al-Qaida network.
Chomsky also questions the current Realpolitik phenomenon of American anti-Islamic Fundamentalism while we currently support Islamic Fundamentalist regimes, such as in Saudi Arabia, which are just as despotic, especially to U.S. "noble ends."
It seems that there is more of a pause among Americans in response to the bombings of 9-11. This is in sharp contrast to the American reaction to the Gulf War incident over a decade ago. Books such as "9-11" by Chomsky perhaps gives us a bit of insight as to why there is more of a "pause."