This classic study, now revised and updated, shows how scientific calculations can be used to improve the understanding, design, and tuning of woodwind instruments. A powerful tool for correcting tuning errors in existing instruments and for creating new designs, Nederveen's work has long been a standard in the field of acoustics.
In an extended new chapter, Nederveen analyzes and interprets recent developmeents in research on the acoustics of woodwind instruments. This revised edition, which also contains a new list of symbols and a new subject index, is a necessity for scholars, teachers, and practitioners of music, physics, acoustics, and woodwind design.
| ||||||||||||
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Certainly a classic ... one of the few books that undertakes a detailed mathematical study of this subject."
—Neville Fletcher, The Australian National University
"A valuable addition to the literature of musical acoustics."—Thomas Rossing, Northern Illinois University
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Tantalizing acoustic secrets revealed.... partially.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: ACOUSTICAL ASPECTS WOODWIND INSTRUMENTS (Paperback)
First off, this is a physicist's book. It is worth bearing in mind that this book is a PhD thesis, and has that format: there are lots of equations, with a few charts on almost every page. That will probably put a lot of people off. Still, if you really want to understand, in a quantitative way, the acoustics of woodwinds, I haven't found another book that approaches it as directly as this one (Fletcher and Rossing's book is encyclopedic in its coverage of instruments, and therefore necessarily thin on specifics of particular instruments). You probably don't need a PhD to read it, but certainly a master's degree to get much out of it.First, the bad news: I think the layout could be improved: the sections are numbered in order from the start of the book right through to the end, rather than in a chapter-by-chapter way. This makes it difficult to find section 27 (for example), because there's no way to narrow down where it might be. The notes added for this edition could have been integrated into the main text, rather than being appended. Still, I suppose the readership may not be large enough to warrant such a thorough overhauling. The good news: This book lays it all out for you, if in a rather terse way. It's broken down into four chapters, roughly corresponding to introduction, bore, toneholes, applications. The math is heavy at times, and is not helped by the choice to print in two columns on each page, thereby causing a lot of equations to be broken over two lines. Also the choice of variable names is not particularly mnemonic, so I found myself constantly referring back a few pages, to remind myself of their meaning. Still, it starts off generically, develops general models, then applies them to each of the classical instruments: flute, sax, clarinet, oboe, bassoon. My greatest wish for future editions of the book would be to augment how much is left unsaid. Each chapter concludes with a half-page summary. More than once, I found myself reading something in the summary that I couldn't recall from the text. But by studying the charts and equations closely, and doing a few back-of-the-envelope calculations, I found that it really was there. (An example would be at the end of Ch.2, where there's a mention of how conical-bore instruments can be overblown in the octave until the truncation ratio reaches about 0.2. It's not explicitly stated in the main text, but you can see it, with a little thought, from the charts on the facing page.) So I feel that the book could really be enhanced with some more textual analysis. I hope the author has a chance to re-work this book - there's clearly so much between the lines.
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Technical review,
By Nelson McAvoy (Keyser, West Virginia, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: ACOUSTICAL ASPECTS WOODWIND INSTRUMENTS (Paperback)
This book has all the information needed to understand and design a woodwind instrument, at least flutes, which I am involved with. It is written clearly, explicitly, and distantly, in all detail, yet with no wasted words or tangential discussions. It is well organized clear and definitive. One can use it to design, flutes with small holes and no keys as were used in the 18th century; wooden classical flutes of the 19 century with or without keys; or modern flutes of the late 19th and 20th century. Design of key works is not included, just acoustical design. Tables are few but with today's calculators, tables are almost obsolete. The previous reviewer said that a Ph. D. in physics is needed to use the book because of the mathematical sophistication. More accurate, would be, an M.S. degree in high frequency electrical engineering, transmission lines and microwave cavity design. The mathematics and physical concepts used in woodwind design were barrowed from electrical transmission and antenna design; concepts like characteristic admittance, standing wave ratios, and impedance matching. However, if one is a physicist or advanced engineer in any field, one can obtain these basic concepts from transmission line theory books with little difficulty, assuming you are at home with basic differential and integral calculus and complex variables. I see no flaws in this book and highly recommend it with 5 stars. Nelson McAvoy
2 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The one woodwind physics book you will ever need,
This review is from: ACOUSTICAL ASPECTS WOODWIND INSTRUMENTS (Paperback)
For whatever reasons, I had thought of attempting a numerical analysis of bagpipe physics. Mostly because nobody has done it in a serious way: preferring to focus on obnoxiously snooty woodwinds like the Clarinet or the Oboe. In any case, the bagpipe is quite amenable to numerical simulation due to the relative simplicity of its construction, and the sophistication of the models for the Clarinet and Oboe. This book is certainly the right one to use, and I have a half dozen ideas based on it, which I eventually need to turn into numeric code. It is vastly better than the other standard references; Benade is oft cited as the "authority." Perhaps he is, but Benade certainly can't communicate his findings as well as Nederveen has in this book (and in fact, to my befuddlement, Benade *doesn't* communicate some more important facts in his book, despite having himself written some of the important journal articles that Nederveen cites in this book).Need to learn about pipe organs, oboes, clarinets or other woodwinds? This is the book to start your research with. Remarkably for the content, it's relatively inexpensive and a very well made softcover book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
