- Brand Name: AMD
- Model Number: ADAFX60CDBOX
- Computer CPU Manufacturer: AMD
AMD Athlon 64 FX60 FX-60 Socket 939 2.6GHZ 1MB X 2 1.5V 110W
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
- Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
- 2.6 Ghz x2
- Socket 939
- 64 Bit
- L2 Cache 2 x 1MB
- Released Jan 2006
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Top Customer Reviews
I'm sure I will get another 2-3 years out of this puppy. So, if you want to build a PC for cheap by the FX-60. It runs everything out there (day to day stuff) perfectly still. It's too bad AMD stopped putting the quality they put in this processor into their stuff of today (2009). Oh well.
After listening to claims that this processor is still able to "run through almost anything I throw at it" and "gets the job done, even now" from different people I decided to buy this since I did not want to buy a new mobo and ram. Needless to say, i'm not impressed with this processor after upgrading from the 4200+. I expected to over clock this thing to 3ghz on a high end fan but after a day of tweaking and testing, I can't go any higher than 2.8ghz stable. I feel sorry for all the people that bought this thing when it was $600-$800 as the performance is hardly better than my 4200+ overclocked to 2.55ghz.
Long story short. Go buy newer (better) processors that are much cheaper than this primitive cpu, don't be lazy and just upgrade everything. But I'm sure most of you already knew that.
Other than that, it got here fast enough and matched the description.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
New life for an older computer. The last best processor for a 939 motherboard.Published 9 months ago by Zendowski
The part fits perfectly and all is working well, faster and smoother than before. My 19 year old son wanted to "fix it himself", and he did. Thank you.Published on December 17, 2013 by Mbr
crushed my system.I upgraded from Fx 52 which was working fine, soon as changed chip, system kept on getting Blue Screen errors, not sure if chip was defective, was out of the... Read morePublished on January 30, 2011 by jon