Have one to sell? Sell yours here
AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY
 
 

AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY

by AMD
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.




Technical Details

  • AMD Phenom X3 8650 2.3 GHz 2 MB Socket AM2+ Triple-Core CPU General Features:
  • AMD Phenom X3 Triple-Core Processor 8650 model number 2300 MHz frequency (2.3 GHz)
  • 2 MB L3 Cache 3 x 512 KB L2 Cache 3 x 128 KB L1 Cache Socket AM2+ 1.05 - 1.25V voltage
  • 65 nm SOI CMOS technology 32/64-bit operating mode True Multi-Core Design
  • AMD64 with Direct Connect Architecture
  See more technical details

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • ASIN: B001R568S0
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: April 2, 2004

Product Description

Step up to a triple-core processor with this AMD Phenom X3 8650 CPU! This AMD Phenom X3 Socket AM2+ CPU operates at 2300 MHz frequency, features 2 MB L3 Cache and provides support for future 64-bit applications! Its AMD64 with Direct Connect Architecture feature can blast through performance bottlenecks and its HyperTransport 3.0 Technology provides support for full 1080p high-definition video and extreme total system bandwidth!

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars Check mobo compatability!, February 5, 2011
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY (Personal Computers)
I was hoping to fire up my Mini ITX board when I got this processor. I guess I should of checked the technical data sheet it came with. I am using it in my desktop machine now and 3 cores is f*****g awesome! I buy from Geeks.com often and this was a great score! A few bucks more than an Athlon64 x2 and you do notice the extra performance a bit. It definately doesn't quite compare with the quads of course, but this is a GREAT bang:buck ratio. Will be a repeated buyer!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars Good for the price, December 29, 2010
This review is from: AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY (Personal Computers)
I have been running this processor for about the past 2 years and have had no problems with it. For the price its a good deal, consider it if you want slightly better performance than a dual core. From what I understand it is a quad-core with a disabled defective core. It has been very stable even when over-clocked to around 2.7 ghz, although my desktop has many fans and I have after-market fan speed controller and temperature sensors.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Just Adequate, December 10, 2010
By 
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY (Personal Computers)
Was expecting more of an overall performance boost when I upgraded an older single-core Athlon. It performs adequately, but that's all. I should have spent the extra $40 and purchased at least a quad-core instead. This chip has narrow and limited overclocking capabilities and is pretty much "maxed-out" right out of the box. I can't fault AMD, this is somewhat better than a dual-core, but not by much. I truly can't recommend this chip unless you're on a tight budget and have no room for anything better. It will perform, and be adequate, but don't have any expectations outside of adequate. One plus - it does do virtualization and runs Windows 7 fairly well, and Windows XP virtualization within Windows 7. Adequate, but not noteworthy. I'm saving my $$ for the 6-core and replacing this.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(1)
(1)
(1)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
See all discussions...  
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
   



Look for Similar Items by Category