Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


4.0 out of 5 stars Check mobo compatability!
I was hoping to fire up my Mini ITX board when I got this processor. I guess I should of checked the technical data sheet it came with. I am using it in my desktop machine now and 3 cores is f*****g awesome! I buy from Geeks.com often and this was a great score! A few bucks more than an Athlon64 x2 and you do notice the extra performance a bit. It definately doesn't quite...
Published 11 months ago by FunkMasterFlex 5000

versus
3.0 out of 5 stars Just Adequate
Was expecting more of an overall performance boost when I upgraded an older single-core Athlon. It performs adequately, but that's all. I should have spent the extra $40 and purchased at least a quad-core instead. This chip has narrow and limited overclocking capabilities and is pretty much "maxed-out" right out of the box. I can't fault AMD, this is somewhat better...
Published 13 months ago by R. Smiley


Most Helpful First | Newest First

4.0 out of 5 stars Check mobo compatability!, February 5, 2011
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY (Personal Computers)
I was hoping to fire up my Mini ITX board when I got this processor. I guess I should of checked the technical data sheet it came with. I am using it in my desktop machine now and 3 cores is f*****g awesome! I buy from Geeks.com often and this was a great score! A few bucks more than an Athlon64 x2 and you do notice the extra performance a bit. It definately doesn't quite compare with the quads of course, but this is a GREAT bang:buck ratio. Will be a repeated buyer!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars Good for the price, December 29, 2010
This review is from: AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY (Personal Computers)
I have been running this processor for about the past 2 years and have had no problems with it. For the price its a good deal, consider it if you want slightly better performance than a dual core. From what I understand it is a quad-core with a disabled defective core. It has been very stable even when over-clocked to around 2.7 ghz, although my desktop has many fans and I have after-market fan speed controller and temperature sensors.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Just Adequate, December 10, 2010
By 
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: AMD HD8650WCJ3BGH PHENOM X 3 8650 AM2+ 2.3 GHZ 3.5 MB 65 NM 95W 3600 MHZ TRAY (Personal Computers)
Was expecting more of an overall performance boost when I upgraded an older single-core Athlon. It performs adequately, but that's all. I should have spent the extra $40 and purchased at least a quad-core instead. This chip has narrow and limited overclocking capabilities and is pretty much "maxed-out" right out of the box. I can't fault AMD, this is somewhat better than a dual-core, but not by much. I truly can't recommend this chip unless you're on a tight budget and have no room for anything better. It will perform, and be adequate, but don't have any expectations outside of adequate. One plus - it does do virtualization and runs Windows 7 fairly well, and Windows XP virtualization within Windows 7. Adequate, but not noteworthy. I'm saving my $$ for the 6-core and replacing this.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product