In America, it is increasingly the case that the people who make, support, or protest military policy have no military experience. As Kathy Roth-Douquet and Frank Schaeffer assert in this groundbreaking work, the gap between the "all-volunteer military" and the rest of us is widening, and our country faces a dangerous lack of understanding between those in power and those who defend our way of life.
AWOL
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
In this impassioned, convincing manifesto, Schaffer (Keeping Faith) and Roth-Douquet, a former Clinton White House and Department of Defense staffer, call for class integration of the military. Their arguments are personal: Roth-Douquet is a military wife and Schaffer's son is a marine, and the authors fall within the demographic they critique. Alternately narrating, they relate their experiences with the military and detail the liabilities of the present all-volunteer "corporate" force: the hindered policy-making ability of a civilian leadership without significant ties to the military, the weakening of the armed forces themselves, and "the sense of lost community and the threat to democracy that results when a society accepts a situation that is inherently unfair." While Schaffer proposes a lottery draft and Roth-Douquet suggests the military "convince" people to sign up, they both call for all young people to submit to some form of national civilian service. Though the authors occasionally exaggerate ("we are fast approaching the day when no one in Congress and no president will have served or have any children serving"), they make a clarion call in the face of increasingly controversial foreign policy and a military stretched thin. (May 9)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Review
“As America looks for balance in a dangerous and complex world, AWOL is a great place to start.” (General Tommy Franks (retired) )
“AWOL drives home...the need to address the evaporating sense of duty and service to our nation.” (General Les Palm (retired), President and CEO Marine Corps Association )
“AWOL is unique in its scope, intent and implications. [It] is clearly written and meticulously researched.” (Leatherneck Magazine )
“AWOL drives home...the need to address the evaporating sense of duty and service to our nation.” (General Les Palm (retired), President and CEO Marine Corps Association )
“AWOL is unique in its scope, intent and implications. [It] is clearly written and meticulously researched.” (Leatherneck Magazine )
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Authors
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
These two authors, one a Republican and one a Democrat, have written a provocative and very timely book about the large portion of society that doesn't see military service as fit for "their" kind of people.
The book starts with an astonishing anecdote. The draft was initiated for World War I because Congress thought too many of the country's elites would rush to fight (and maybe die) for the country!
That concept simply could not even be comprehended today, where the children of our current elected leaders in Washington, DC, with a few noticeable exceptions, would rather avoid serving the country in the military.
The authors identify several symptoms of the problem: Recruiters who are discouraged from even bothering to look for potential troops at elite private universities, and instead recruit from state and small Christian schools in the south; the hostility of some parents to recruiters even talking to their children; and the rise of the "me" culture and the attendant devolution of the call to service (We certainly never heard that call after 9/11).
This is an important book. While the authors sometimes get bogged down or distracted--for example in their attempt to give a brief history of four different schools of thought of US foreign policy (leave that to Walter Russell Meade please)--their thesis is powerful and important. Besides, some of their most moving sections are from testimonials from current and former servicemembers on what duty and service means.
I highly recommend this book.
The book starts with an astonishing anecdote. The draft was initiated for World War I because Congress thought too many of the country's elites would rush to fight (and maybe die) for the country!
That concept simply could not even be comprehended today, where the children of our current elected leaders in Washington, DC, with a few noticeable exceptions, would rather avoid serving the country in the military.
The authors identify several symptoms of the problem: Recruiters who are discouraged from even bothering to look for potential troops at elite private universities, and instead recruit from state and small Christian schools in the south; the hostility of some parents to recruiters even talking to their children; and the rise of the "me" culture and the attendant devolution of the call to service (We certainly never heard that call after 9/11).
This is an important book. While the authors sometimes get bogged down or distracted--for example in their attempt to give a brief history of four different schools of thought of US foreign policy (leave that to Walter Russell Meade please)--their thesis is powerful and important. Besides, some of their most moving sections are from testimonials from current and former servicemembers on what duty and service means.
I highly recommend this book.
26 of 30 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
This is one of those books where you hope more Americans will read it but sadly realize those who should wont. Kathy Roth-Douquet and Frank Schaeffer do an excellent job writing about how their thinking evolved as far as the military is concerned, both with her husband being in the military (Marines) and then Franks son joining (Marines).
Especially interesting is how she shares growing up in Shaker Heights, Ohio, attending Bryn Mawr College and basically living a wonderful life, lacking in nothing. Being an active Democrat, working in the Clinton White House where on page 14 she writes 'The military people we knew were so impressive - tall and direct, knowledgeable about their jobs, dedicated'. Not what some of us were led to believe by some 'conservatives' who suggested the Clinton White House detested the military.
Frank writes of 1970 and getting married to Genie whom he raves about and how they to led a life surrounded by the right people and then 1999 arrived and his youngest son, John, was about to ship off to boot camp on Parris Island. The way he writes of what an eye opening experience this was is excellent. Bearing in mind these are families where military service wasn't the norm.
Unlike my family where my Dad was a POW during WW2, my husband was in the California National Guard and foster sons now serve in the guard with one due to ship to Iraq this month. My ancestors have fought in every war going back to the before we were a government. Some traveled west with Captain Fremont on his trek to California who over saw the first California Volunteer Militia. I also note that we all attended college.
Reading the honest feelings of these two writers and the comments friends made when they discovered a husband, a son were in the military, by choice is sad at times. On page 23 Frank writes 'I felt ashamed of feeling embarrassed by the fact that John was not in college. When my neighbors, people who went to Harvard and drove Saabs, asked about where John was in school, I mentioned that Francis, my 'other son' got the top academic award at the Georgetown School of Foreign Service. 'My daughter is living in Scandinavia and doing graduate studies and raising two children and speaks three languages and is running a successful ceramics business....' I felt like Judas. Nevertheless I let everyone know that John could have gone anywhere and that he 'chose the Marines as a poet chooses to write about it later'. I came up with all sorts of bullshit like that. 'He wants to live large,' I lamely said.
This has got to be one of best books I have read this year. A book I might add that every parent should read. Especially those who profess to be conservative, religious and patriotic because as the authors note very few of the upper class be they Republican or Democrat have a son, daughter or even a relative serving in any military branch of the services.
On page 43: 'In 1956, 400 out of 750 in Princeton's graduating class went into the military. In contrast, in 2004, 9 members of Princeton's graduating class entered the services, and they LED the Ivy League in numbers'. (emphasis added by me). Or as the authors note on page 30 a few pages back 'Privileged folks may be proud of the troops, but most contemporary men and women in uniform are strangers to the most influential segment of society. Mark Shields, syndicated columnist, former Marine, and PBS pundit, noted in a recent essay on this subject that 'probably nobody at any Washington dinner party tonight - liberal or conservative, Bush appointee or Democratic holdover-personally knows of any enlisted man or woman now defending the nation.' Not to long ago the sons of presidents, bankers, and oilmen regularly served. This was even true of powerful dynasties such as the Roosevelt's, the Kennedy's, the Sulzbergers (owners and publishers of the New York Times), and the Bushes. Now, however not one grandchild from those powerful dynasties serves'.
I was humbled and proud reading how Frank would visit Harlem and a jazz club where veterans from other wars played on a regular basis and how these gentle, class black men embraced Frank and took him under their wing. Likewise Frank reminds the reader of the sacrifices they made and the bigotry they endured, and that more patriotic men you wont find anywhere in America.
Beginning on page 224 the authors offer some excellent ideas on how we can make the volunteer military more fair and equal so that more upper class or privileged kids will have to join. Like Reform current military recruiting and personnel policy. Change Federal student aid and introduce a tax credit. 'The current system of federal financial aid grew out of the G I Bill but now, as Charles Moskos has pointed out, it is a 'GI Bill without the Gi'. He proposes reinstating its original intent as a vehicle for rewarding veterans for their service and making federal financial aid contingent on providing some service to your country'. YES!!!!!
Scale up the Army citizen - Soldier Option. Create a National Service Lottery. I so agree, because we are or have become a nation of citizens who think they are entitled to so much, but are never required to give anything back. Universal service - Military and National Service. Again I agree 100%. As the author quotes 'Universal service could provide some much needed 'social glue' to an embattled American society that is growing increasingly diverse - by race, national origin, and religious preference - where many young Americans from well to do families grow up and go to school hermetically sealed social environments...'. Universal Service II Manning the HomeFront and Policing Abroad, which would required a draft, not for combat soldiers, but for noncombat positions and to address the increased needs on the homefront that emerge from the War on Terror (page 227).
Alas this book couldn't have come at a better time. And I end by adding, that I live in Amador County in California a nice drive southwest of Lake Tahoe, where the voter turn out for the state, ranks us #1, #2 sometimes. Most homes fly a flag, most cars have 'Support the Troops' yellow magnetic ribbons on them. But a lot of vehicles also have stickers that denote sons, daughters, husbands, wives, brothers, sisters now serving in some branch of the military. Contrast that to a two hour drive west to the bay area where you see little of what we see.
Ironcially I have most of the books Frank Schaeffers Father had written and I had assumed that being conservative, and Christian that the family would have been gungho for anything patriotic, including military service and have to admit I was a tad surprised to read that Frank was so taken aback, yet would become so profoundly proud of his son John, and with good reason.
Especially interesting is how she shares growing up in Shaker Heights, Ohio, attending Bryn Mawr College and basically living a wonderful life, lacking in nothing. Being an active Democrat, working in the Clinton White House where on page 14 she writes 'The military people we knew were so impressive - tall and direct, knowledgeable about their jobs, dedicated'. Not what some of us were led to believe by some 'conservatives' who suggested the Clinton White House detested the military.
Frank writes of 1970 and getting married to Genie whom he raves about and how they to led a life surrounded by the right people and then 1999 arrived and his youngest son, John, was about to ship off to boot camp on Parris Island. The way he writes of what an eye opening experience this was is excellent. Bearing in mind these are families where military service wasn't the norm.
Unlike my family where my Dad was a POW during WW2, my husband was in the California National Guard and foster sons now serve in the guard with one due to ship to Iraq this month. My ancestors have fought in every war going back to the before we were a government. Some traveled west with Captain Fremont on his trek to California who over saw the first California Volunteer Militia. I also note that we all attended college.
Reading the honest feelings of these two writers and the comments friends made when they discovered a husband, a son were in the military, by choice is sad at times. On page 23 Frank writes 'I felt ashamed of feeling embarrassed by the fact that John was not in college. When my neighbors, people who went to Harvard and drove Saabs, asked about where John was in school, I mentioned that Francis, my 'other son' got the top academic award at the Georgetown School of Foreign Service. 'My daughter is living in Scandinavia and doing graduate studies and raising two children and speaks three languages and is running a successful ceramics business....' I felt like Judas. Nevertheless I let everyone know that John could have gone anywhere and that he 'chose the Marines as a poet chooses to write about it later'. I came up with all sorts of bullshit like that. 'He wants to live large,' I lamely said.
This has got to be one of best books I have read this year. A book I might add that every parent should read. Especially those who profess to be conservative, religious and patriotic because as the authors note very few of the upper class be they Republican or Democrat have a son, daughter or even a relative serving in any military branch of the services.
On page 43: 'In 1956, 400 out of 750 in Princeton's graduating class went into the military. In contrast, in 2004, 9 members of Princeton's graduating class entered the services, and they LED the Ivy League in numbers'. (emphasis added by me). Or as the authors note on page 30 a few pages back 'Privileged folks may be proud of the troops, but most contemporary men and women in uniform are strangers to the most influential segment of society. Mark Shields, syndicated columnist, former Marine, and PBS pundit, noted in a recent essay on this subject that 'probably nobody at any Washington dinner party tonight - liberal or conservative, Bush appointee or Democratic holdover-personally knows of any enlisted man or woman now defending the nation.' Not to long ago the sons of presidents, bankers, and oilmen regularly served. This was even true of powerful dynasties such as the Roosevelt's, the Kennedy's, the Sulzbergers (owners and publishers of the New York Times), and the Bushes. Now, however not one grandchild from those powerful dynasties serves'.
I was humbled and proud reading how Frank would visit Harlem and a jazz club where veterans from other wars played on a regular basis and how these gentle, class black men embraced Frank and took him under their wing. Likewise Frank reminds the reader of the sacrifices they made and the bigotry they endured, and that more patriotic men you wont find anywhere in America.
Beginning on page 224 the authors offer some excellent ideas on how we can make the volunteer military more fair and equal so that more upper class or privileged kids will have to join. Like Reform current military recruiting and personnel policy. Change Federal student aid and introduce a tax credit. 'The current system of federal financial aid grew out of the G I Bill but now, as Charles Moskos has pointed out, it is a 'GI Bill without the Gi'. He proposes reinstating its original intent as a vehicle for rewarding veterans for their service and making federal financial aid contingent on providing some service to your country'. YES!!!!!
Scale up the Army citizen - Soldier Option. Create a National Service Lottery. I so agree, because we are or have become a nation of citizens who think they are entitled to so much, but are never required to give anything back. Universal service - Military and National Service. Again I agree 100%. As the author quotes 'Universal service could provide some much needed 'social glue' to an embattled American society that is growing increasingly diverse - by race, national origin, and religious preference - where many young Americans from well to do families grow up and go to school hermetically sealed social environments...'. Universal Service II Manning the HomeFront and Policing Abroad, which would required a draft, not for combat soldiers, but for noncombat positions and to address the increased needs on the homefront that emerge from the War on Terror (page 227).
Alas this book couldn't have come at a better time. And I end by adding, that I live in Amador County in California a nice drive southwest of Lake Tahoe, where the voter turn out for the state, ranks us #1, #2 sometimes. Most homes fly a flag, most cars have 'Support the Troops' yellow magnetic ribbons on them. But a lot of vehicles also have stickers that denote sons, daughters, husbands, wives, brothers, sisters now serving in some branch of the military. Contrast that to a two hour drive west to the bay area where you see little of what we see.
Ironcially I have most of the books Frank Schaeffers Father had written and I had assumed that being conservative, and Christian that the family would have been gungho for anything patriotic, including military service and have to admit I was a tad surprised to read that Frank was so taken aback, yet would become so profoundly proud of his son John, and with good reason.
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful
By K.H.
VINE™ VOICE
Format:Hardcover
Frank Schaeffer, a terrifc writer whether in the world of military, religion, or fiction brings his considerable skills with Kathy Roth-Douquet to bear on this seminal work on this nations upperclass' failures to support the military in deed, but often provide support with pale words.(I must admit to finding Frank one of the most skilled populist writers around today, and whether in agreement or not, he is a great communicator)
The book provides observations and yes, research, and although I have very minor quibbles, (Kathy, gives Clinton too much credit, although she is at times critical as well and while the military did a fine job, the stopping of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo has in reality, just caused other problems in reverse; and Frank supports a lottery draft, potentially problematic, albiet historically, it works more often than not - I prefer Kathy's option) these two authors provide great analysis and insight.
The strengths of this book are many: one, on how the military recruits on college campus and spends its money on ROTC programs faults our leaders for not engaging the upperclass. While this is understandable due to ivy league hostilities, it still needs to be pursued; two, the lack of moral clarity among our upperclasses ("me" and my "choice") is staggering and since these are the people generally with money, they are ripe for politcal leadrership, therefore, possibly using military men and women for their gains in foreign worlds, while not always properly equiping this same military to do the job; thirdly, the "not for people like us" is insightful and speaks to a snobbish group, again, lacking any moral clarity, especially when sacrafices are needed from them.
Lastly, the authors make an important point that liberal elites in particular just do not get: That being in the military is not a job decided on "do I support this war or that war", but a calling to serve. Knowing that if one only joined in military operations one agreed with, there would not be a military that could responed to protect this country. Military members only obey the President, they do not serve him, but the America people and our founding documents. This point is leveled graciously, but forcefully, and thank goodness.
Now, hopefully, our political readers will read and heed, before middle-class and poor Americans decide they want to be selfish too, then who will provide our Country's security?
Thank you Frank and Kathy.
The book provides observations and yes, research, and although I have very minor quibbles, (Kathy, gives Clinton too much credit, although she is at times critical as well and while the military did a fine job, the stopping of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo has in reality, just caused other problems in reverse; and Frank supports a lottery draft, potentially problematic, albiet historically, it works more often than not - I prefer Kathy's option) these two authors provide great analysis and insight.
The strengths of this book are many: one, on how the military recruits on college campus and spends its money on ROTC programs faults our leaders for not engaging the upperclass. While this is understandable due to ivy league hostilities, it still needs to be pursued; two, the lack of moral clarity among our upperclasses ("me" and my "choice") is staggering and since these are the people generally with money, they are ripe for politcal leadrership, therefore, possibly using military men and women for their gains in foreign worlds, while not always properly equiping this same military to do the job; thirdly, the "not for people like us" is insightful and speaks to a snobbish group, again, lacking any moral clarity, especially when sacrafices are needed from them.
Lastly, the authors make an important point that liberal elites in particular just do not get: That being in the military is not a job decided on "do I support this war or that war", but a calling to serve. Knowing that if one only joined in military operations one agreed with, there would not be a military that could responed to protect this country. Military members only obey the President, they do not serve him, but the America people and our founding documents. This point is leveled graciously, but forcefully, and thank goodness.
Now, hopefully, our political readers will read and heed, before middle-class and poor Americans decide they want to be selfish too, then who will provide our Country's security?
Thank you Frank and Kathy.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
AWOL is a book every American should read
I had to read this for a political theory class and I'm so glad I did! It made me appreciate and better understand my own service to the country. Read more
Published 5 months ago by Rachael Bassett
5.0 out of 5 stars
Well done
Should be required reading for all citizens. They raise a serious question that needs to be answered before this country can really get back on track. Shared sacrifice? Read more
Published 6 months ago by David Gold
5.0 out of 5 stars
Definitely absent
The authors cover every imagineable aspect of national service or lack thereof and it is done without castigation of those too elite to serve.
Published on May 1, 2011 by Arthur C. Schefler
4.0 out of 5 stars
It should at least make you think
If nothing else, this book puts into perspective some of the social/economic classes in the US, and their relationship with the military today, versus what it was not too long ago. Read more
Published on July 17, 2010 by K-9
5.0 out of 5 stars
Stunning and elegant
This book is a wonderful read, and condenses the current mindset of the upper class against the military, resulting in the lack of upper class sons and daughters in our military. Read more
Published on January 26, 2010 by Rough Customer
4.0 out of 5 stars
An Interesting Perspective
This book offers an interesting perspective on why there seems to be a disconnect between the US Military and the upper/ruling class of the United States. Read more
Published on August 21, 2009 by Eddie Bancroft
2.0 out of 5 stars
Too many stories, and not enough synthesis
This book discusses the overly small representation of America's upper classes from the US military, and how this affects the USA. Read more
Published on April 17, 2009 by Newton Ooi
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Real Issue to Be Dealt With
Yes, the military situation and those who enlist and those who do not really needs some kind of revamping I'd say. Too top heavy with regular Americans. Read more
Published on April 3, 2009 by So. Calif book reader
5.0 out of 5 stars
All Americans Should Read This
This is a thought provoking book that all Americans should take the time to read, think about carefully, and discuss with family and friends.
Published on March 18, 2008 by K. F. Hargrove
3.0 out of 5 stars
Over the Hill or Over the Top?
The title of the book states its major theme. The authors perceive a disconnect between the military and the "upper-middle-class" - a broad group of people that apparently... Read more
Published on January 4, 2008 by Gerard J. St John
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
So You'd Like to...
Look for Similar Items by Category
- Books > History > Military Science
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Public Affairs & Policy
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Specific Topics > Civics & Citizenship
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Sociology > Class
- Books > Professional & Technical > Engineering > Special Topics
