Acceptable Evidence and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$5.13 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy)
 
 
Start reading Acceptable Evidence on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy) [Hardcover]

Deborah G. Mayo (Editor), Rachelle D. Hollander (Editor)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $48.00  
Hardcover --  
Paperback $60.00  

Book Description

0195063724 978-0195063721 November 14, 1991
Discussions of science and values in risk management have largely focussed on the entry of values in judging risks, that is, issues of acceptable risk. This volume instead concentrates on the entry of values in collecting, interpreting, communicating, and evaluating the evidence of risks, that is, issues of the acceptability of evidence of risk. By focusing on acceptable evidence, this volume avoids two barriers to progress: views that assume that evidence of risk is largely a matter of objective scientific data and therefore uncontroversial, and views that assume that evidence of risk is ineluctably a matter of values and therefore not amenable to reasoned critique. This volume denies both extremes. It argues for a more constructive conclusion: that understanding the interrelations of scientific with value issues enables a critical scrutiny of risk assessments. This volume analyzes environmental and medical controversies, and assumptions underlying views about risk assessment and the scientific and statistical models used in risk management. Contributors include philosophers, policy analysts, and natural and social scientists.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


Editorial Reviews

Review


"An excellent survey of a number of issues in environmental ethics."--Joel B. Goldsteen, University of Texas at Arlington


"This volume shows that rational, critical approaches to value-laden risk judgments can be fruitful, making possible more sophisticated risk assessments and risk management that better comprehends the values at stake....The focus on evidence of risk and values holds together the diversity of perspectives and real world examples, making the volume useful for teaching."--Ethics


--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

About the Author

Deborah G. Mayo is at Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Rachelle D. Hollander is at National Science Foundation. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 304 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (November 14, 1991)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0195063724
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195063721
  • Product Dimensions: 8.7 x 5.9 x 1.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,242,573 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews


There are no customer reviews yet.
Video reviews
Video reviews
Amazon now allows customers to upload product video reviews. Use a webcam or video camera to record and upload reviews to Amazon.



Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
radioactive waste management, risk communication, retrolental fibroplasia, communicating information about chemical risks, separating risk assessment, guidelines for this principle, global elusive hazards, metascientific views, uneasy divorce, scientific proceduralism, separatist reforms, amplified hazards, categorical value judgments, epidemiological causation, risk assessment from risk management, empirical confirmability, therapeutic obligation, demand for zero risk, new separatism, naive positivists, formaldehyde case, second repository, risk judgments, judgmental probability, first repository
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
New York, United States, Risk Analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Human Values, Royal Commission, Yucca Mountain, Department of Energy, Three Mile Island, University of California Press, Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Office of Technology Assessment, Government Printing Office, Environmental Pollution, New England Journal of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, National Science Foundation, Conservation Foundation, New Haven, National Academy Press, Yale University Press, National Toxicology Program, Oak Ridge, Native American
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...



Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject