Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Active Liberty on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution [Hardcover]

by Stephen Breyer
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (48 customer reviews)

List Price: $24.95
Price: $17.45 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
You Save: $7.50 (30%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Monday, April 28? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $9.99  
Hardcover $17.45  
Paperback $13.21  
Audio, CD --  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $11.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Sell Us Your Books
Get up to 80% back when you sell us your books, even if you didn't buy them at Amazon. Learn more

Book Description

September 13, 2005 0307263134 978-0307263131 First Edition
This book, based on the Tanner lectures on Human Values that Justice Stephen Breyer delivered at Harvard University in November 2004, defines the term “active liberty” as a sharing of the nation’s sovereign authority with its citizens. Regarding the Constitution as a guide for the application of basic American principles to a living and changing society rather than as an arsenal of rigid legal means for binding and restricting it, Justice Breyer argues that the genius of the Constitution rests not in any static meaning it might have had in a world that is dead and gone, but in the adaptability of its great principles to cope with current problems.

Giving us examples of this approach in the areas of free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Justice Breyer states that courts should take greater account of the Constitution’s democratic nature when they interpret constitutional and statutory texts. He also insists that the people, through participation in community life, can and must develop the experience necessary to govern their own affairs. His distinctive contribution to the federalism debate is his claim that deference to congressional power can actually promote democratic participation rather than thwart it. He argues convincingly that although Congress is not perfect, it has done a better job than either the executive or judicial branches at balancing the conflicting views of citizens across the nation, especially during times of national crisis. With a fine appreciation for complexity, Breyer reminds all Americans that Congress, rather than the courts, is the place to resolve policy disputes.

Active Liberty
is a declaration of the first importance, made by a judge often regarded as one of the court’s most brilliant members.

Frequently Bought Together

Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution + A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (University Center for Human Values)
Price for both: $32.10

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Starred Review. Supreme Court Justice Breyer offers his view of constitutional interpretation at a crucial time, when the Court's future is very much at stake. Breyer himself made the crucial deciding votes recently in the two 10 Commandments cases: he notably split his vote, supporting the display in Texas and opposing the one in Kentucky, a nuanced choice that confounded many and that he explains lucidly here. Breyer works this explanation into a larger look at an important aspect of his judicial philosophy: the need for justices to look at cases in light of how their decisions will promote what he calls "active liberty," the Constitution's aim of promoting participation by citizens in the processes of government. It's an approach that emphasizes "the document's underlying values" and looking broadly at a law's purpose and consequences rather than relying on a rigid overarching theory of judicial interpretation.The justice looks at six areas of law to show how this approach influenced, or might have influenced, high court decisions on free speech, affirmative action, and privacy, among others. For instance, in free speech, Breyer notes that an active-liberty outlook would have led the Court to support campaign finance laws controlling soft-money contributions. He explains how the Court's decision in favor of the University of Michigan law school's affirmative action program supported the participation of minorities in our political system. (Interestingly, he doesn't discuss the Court's simultaneous decision against the university's undergraduate affirmative action program.)Breyer saves his hard ball for the very end: a calm, judicious but powerful attack on the interpretive approach of some of his judicial colleagues, what he calls an "originalist" approach, relying primarily on a close reading of the text of a statute or the Constitution. Anticipating originalists' criticism that only their approach can prevent judicial subjectivity, Breyer forcefully illustrates the many constraints on subjectivity and shows that originalism is not as objective as they claim. Breyer's prose is admirably simple and clear, and his discussion shows a keen legal intellect that espouses broad values rather than narrow theories, and a deep, humane concern with fostering democracy and the well-being of the citizenry. This will be essential reading at a possibly watershed moment for the Supreme Court. 50,000 first printing. (Sept. 17)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

An associate justice of the Supreme Court, Breyer proposes a framework for approaching constitutional issues that gives priority to the underlying purposes of the Constitution when engaging such issues. The underlying constitutional value with which he is most concerned is "active liberty," which places emphasis on democratic participation. To a lesser extent, Breyer is concerned with modern liberty, or government intrusion on the rights of individuals. Breyer maintains that the value of participation in a democracy can impact -decision-making, and he gives examples in affirmative action, free speech, and federalism. His position contrasts sharply with the strict constructionist approach favored by certain of his more conservative cohorts, who try to limit their focus to the strict language of the Constitution and other statutes. Interestingly, Breyer's approach has much in common with certain conservative values, as the active liberty approach tends to defer to Congress. However, for the purpose of greater citizen participation, he envisions an approach that is adaptive and changes over time. Rather than looking exclusively to the past, Breyer appreciates the need to engage the Constitution as a living document. Vernon Ford
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Knopf; First Edition edition (September 13, 2005)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0307263134
  • ISBN-13: 978-0307263131
  • Product Dimensions: 7.8 x 5.3 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 8.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (48 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #445,361 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
110 of 123 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Liberal argument against legal doctrine of originalism September 13, 2005
Format:Hardcover
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer's Active Liberty is an articulate short volume that argues that judges are to interpret the Constitution in a way "that helps a community of individuals democratically find practical solutions to important contemporary social problems." Justice Breyer's philosophy of judicial interpretation is squared against that of originalism, which argues that the law, including the Constitution, is to be interpreted in line with its original meaning and the Founding Fathers' intent. Originalists argue that the meaning of the Constitution does not change ("evolve") over time. Justice Breyer is among those who argue that it does. Originalists would counter that if the Constitution is to be changed, this should occur via constitutional amendment rather than via a new and subjective interpretation by a sitting judge or justice.

Justice Breyer argues that what matters is "the document's underlying values" and a law's consequences, not a "rigid," restrictive interpretation of its text. He argues that the Founding Fathers' intent is not always quite as clear as originalists make it out to be. Furthermore, the Constitution is at times deliberately vague because it was meant to apply to changing times. Thus, he argues, originalists are no less subjective than those who are not.

Originalism first jumped from the pages of legal journals to the arena of political debate following a 1985 speech to the American Bar Association by then Attorney General Edwin Meese III. The case for originalism was more recently argued by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in his superb 1997 book A Matter of Interpretation, which includes dissenting philosophies by several distinguished legal philosophers. Justice Breyer's Active Liberty makes a worthwhile contribution to this continuing debate. Like Justice Scalia's volume, it is short, and its language is highly accessible to non-lawyers.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
51 of 56 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
A book touching upon constitutional interpretation by a sitting Justice has to be of substantial interest to students of the Court. That is true of this slender volume by Justice Breyer as well--but the book is hard to categorize, and I am not quite sure what he hoped to accomplish in this published version of his Tanner Lectures. Certainly, he is not squaring off by name against the contrasting views of Justice Scalia, as expressed in "A Matter of Interpretation" and "Scalia Dissents" (edited by K. Ring), or Justice Thomas. In fact, there are few references to either in this volume. He comes closest to this kind of focused debate in the final section of the book designated as "A Serious Objection." There he does critically focus in on the originalist/literalist approach and does so in a highly effective matter. I would suggest that reading this chapter first may put the remainder of the volume in better perspective. But be forewarned, this book is not designed to be a point-by-point, head-on refutation of the Scalia/Thomas approach.

The Justice's key contention is that in interpreting the Constitution and statutes, judges should take into account what result will facilitate the "people's" greater participation and involvement in their own government. This formula is expressed in a variety of ways, but that seems to be his main point. He discusses how this perspective would bear beneficial results in a number of areas (e.g., federalism, speech, privacy, affirmative action, administrative law) and how applying this approach results in interpretation that is closer to the intent of the drafters, be it the Constitution or statutes.
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
26 of 29 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Active Liberty and the Reasonable Legislator October 4, 2005
Format:Hardcover
Justice Breyer has two main lines of arguments, "Active Liberty" and the less talked about "Reasonable Legislator", which are connected by the overarching theme of supporting democracy. "Active Liberty" suggests that when the legal air is foggy, emphasizing active participation of the people in decision making should be used to clarify. "Reasonable Legislator" suggests that when a law is ambiguous, a judge should invoke the spirit of a reasonable legislator to determine what he/she likely would intend, even if none of the legislators had anticipated the tricky knot their law tied.

There are potential conflicts in his "reasonable legislator" proposal with other points of view in the book. For example, as Justice Breyer envisions it, "The judge will ask how this person [reasonable legislator] ... would have wanted a court to interpret the statute in light of present circumstances in the particular case" (p. 88). However, one case he discusses is an interesting recent court decision parsing the language and intent of the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 (p. 91+). Must a judge really need to know the comprehensive historical context of 1925 America and conjure up Babbitt to ask him for guidance on his unspecified, subtle legislative aims? If so, would not this be subject to the same criticism he applies to 'originalist' approaches: "'the more 'originalist' judges cannot appeal to the Framers themselves in support of their interpretive views" (p. 117). Since Justice Breyer acknowledges that "Judges are not expert historians" (p. 126), I have not yet gained a full appreciation of this approach.

My amateur criticisms aside, I thoroughly enjoyed the book. As a non-lawyer I felt both enlightened by the content and encouraged by the thoughtful tone.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars Sigh
I should like this book more than I do. Justice Breyer is an important public thinker, and not just by virtue of being on the Supreme Court. Read more
Published 19 days ago by Marc Poirier
3.0 out of 5 stars Should be Read
If interested in the subject of interpretation (especially Constitutional) this is necessary reading. Read more
Published 7 months ago by Michael C. Black
5.0 out of 5 stars active liberty book
This book was just what the description said. There was one marking on the inside cover on the book and that is all. Great quality and great price!
Published 9 months ago by Amazon Customer
2.0 out of 5 stars Active Liberty or Ignoring the Constitution?
In Justice Stephen Breyer's book Active Liberty, he argues that the Constitution created a federal government embodying the principles of democracy and, as such, judges should... Read more
Published 15 months ago by Sean Rosenthal
4.0 out of 5 stars Good Product
Very efficient, good condition, and great book. I had to use it for a class and it was perfect for what I needed!
Published 16 months ago by Justin Camper
5.0 out of 5 stars A More Democratic Interpretation of the Constitution
Justice Stephen Breyer's Active Liberty presents a Democratic Interpretation of the Constitution. In 2005, Alfred A. Knopf published a book by U.S. Read more
Published 23 months ago by Arthur Blenheim
2.0 out of 5 stars The liberty of the ancients, the liberty of the moderns, and the...
The meaning of the Constitution is not always clear. A Supreme Court justice's toughest job is to choose which of several possible meanings the Constitution has in a particular... Read more
Published on February 5, 2011 by Daniel R. Baker
2.0 out of 5 stars Breyer v. Rule of Law
The reigning dogma of jurisprudence decrees that the Constitution means whatever the Supreme Court says it means. Active Liberty nicely exemplifies this dogma. Read more
Published on November 9, 2010 by annodomini.co
4.0 out of 5 stars Very readable defense of intentions-based interpretation
Justice Breyer created a very readable defense of his approach of intentions-based Constitutional interpretation as compared to textually-literal interpretive styles. Read more
Published on November 2, 2010 by Andrew Berschauer
4.0 out of 5 stars Interpretation vs. literalism (3.75*s)
Judge Breyer is obviously responding to Constitutional "literalists" in this short work, among them, judges Scalia and Thomas. Read more
Published on July 24, 2010 by J. Grattan
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews
ARRAY(0xa7080d74)

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



Look for Similar Items by Category