Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Admissions, not academics, may determine success, October 27, 2001
This review is from: Admissions Confidential: An Insider's Account of the Elite College Selection Process (Hardcover)
This is a nice, light, fast, fun read. College admissions staff have many stories to tell. Toor tells plenty about applicants, admissions officers, and her friends. This is a personal case study, not empirical research, so any findings or conclusions should be viewed with real caution. Many will find it too personal and, at times, self-centered. Personally, I would have been glad to forego the pig stories, and I'm not referring to applicants. That said, writing here as a long-time university professor and administrator, none of what Toor wrote surprised me. In fact, I continue to be more surprised by people who think that students applying to great schools are admitted based only on their SATs, just like some parents believe that students at large public universities have full-time professors teaching all the first-year classes. Toor reports the abundant resources (if low pay for admissions staff), intense competition and sometimes convuluted admissions decisions of one of our most prestigious schools. The portfolio of scores, skills, essays, recommendations, extracurriculars and other facets of the first twelve years of an education comes under closer scrutiny than any of the work the student is likely to put forth in his or her classes in the coming four years. The investment part of the educational model at Duke appears to be spent in the admissions office, not saved for the classroom. Research shows, contrary to the elitist assertion repeated here, that it matters less what university you attend than to what university you are admitted. Its the admissions process that is the hallmark of the top schools, not the academic experience itself. Get admitted to Penn State and Princeton, attend Penn State, and statistics show that the graduate will do as well having attended Penn State instead of Princeton. And she will have saved enough money in four years to fund much of her entire retirement. Strange but true. So it just might be worth finding out if you can cut it in the (Duke) admissions rounds. Pray you get admitted. But then save your money and attend a good but affordable school.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Overrated by herself, April 11, 2005
The author's opinion of herself -- how interesting she is and how her Yale background (frequently mentioned) makes her eminently qualified to rate others -- is the driving force behind this book. There is a certain amount of informative material here that can open the eyes of college applicants and their parents and counselors. However, the only thing that really makes the book unique is its personal memoir style, which on balance detracts from rather than adds to the value of the book. Padding the book with irrelevant "insights" into her personal life and with reprints of columns previously published elsewhere both reflect that the book is really as much about the author as anything else. The reader also gets the impression that the author sought the job in the first place in order to write a book about it later. There is some justice in the world, however. Telling applicants to be careful not to submit essays with "embarrassing typos," the author relates a tale of having a girl applicant write that "she wanted to go to a 'smaller private school like Duke,' not one the the 'big state pubic institutions." (2001 paperback edition, p. 49.) It is so sweet that a few pages later, she herself writes: "Kids from elite private schools rarely get fives in achievement. And only the top few from the good pubic schools do." (Page 94.) Oops! If you're going to be smugly superior about others' imperfections, you'd better also be perfect.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Cleverly written but.., November 26, 2001
This review is from: Admissions Confidential: An Insider's Account of the Elite College Selection Process (Hardcover)
I am a college admission professional and while I really enjoyed the peak inside the Duke Admission office, the author does not offer real advice for the type of people who will most likely buy this book. 3.9+ gpa and 1400 SAT's are great credentials, but what else--what is your hook--how do you stand apart from thousands just like you? I don't envy the challenge of handling 14,000 BWRK (Bright, Well-Rounded Kids) and a goal of selecting maybe 3,000 for admission? Lots of people who are qualified are not admitted, but you do not need a whole book to learn this. Toor's writing style does suck you in and you do find yourself rooting for the few students who she profiles a bit more indepth. I for one did not mind her forays outside the admission office as it showed some personality, however the pig stories might have been a bit much. Her introductions to each chapter show off her excellent writing skills, it is just too bad that her talent is tied up in an overlong newspaper article. If you are thinking about this book because you want a leg up on the competition, you are probably better off reading A for Admission (which Toor takes a swipe at in her introduction) by Michele Hernandez. Bottom line is that there are lots of great colleges out there, some have big time names like Duke, Yale, Stanford etc... While others offer excellent educations in their own right even if their name is Kenyon, Carleton, Albion or Grinnell. The names might not be as recognizable, but the experience will be just as good if not better. Glad I read this--yes for the inside look, but not much else.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
