The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward A Critique of Marxist Aesthetics [Paperback]

Herbert Marcuse (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 0807015199 | ISBN-13: 978-0807015193 | Publication Date: June 15, 1979

Developing a concept briefly introduced in Counterrevolution and Revolt, Marcuse here addresses the shortcomings of a Marxist aesthetic theory and explores a dialectical aesthetic in which art functions as the conscience of society. Marcuse argues that art is the only form of expression that can take up where religion and philosophy fail and contends that aesthetic offers the last refuge for two-dimensional criticism in a one-dimensional society.

Editorial Reviews

Language Notes

Text: English, German (translation) --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Marcuse is a Beacon Press author.

Product Details

• Paperback: 108 pages
• Publisher: Beacon Press (June 15, 1979)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0807015199
• ISBN-13: 978-0807015193
• Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.2 x 8.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 4.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #360,406 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

27 of 28 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars pithy and to the point, September 16, 2000

By 

A Customer - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward A Critique of Marxist Aesthetics (Paperback)

Herbert Marcuse, original member of the so-called 'Frankfurt School', here presents a critique of Marxist aesthetics in one of his last books. Although only 72 pages long, the book is powerful in its argument against the orthodox Marxist view that 'art represents its the interests and world outlook of particular social classes.' Marcuse argues for the importance of art in itself, apart from its source, writing, 'the criteria for the progressive character of art are given only in the work itself as a whole: in what it says and how it says it.' He truly believes that art's place in the world is not to change the world directly but to influence how people perceive the world and thereby lead them to change it.

Marcuse also touches upon other aspects of aesthetics, like his belief in a constant standard allowing us to distinguish between high and low art and the question of the 'end of art' as posited by Bertolt Brecht and others. Nevertheless his main argument is most powerful: he ends the book by praising art's role in representing 'the ultimate goal of all revolutions: the freedom and happiness of the individual.'

Truly a valuable book for all students of art, aesthetics and philosophy.

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Delving in the emancipatory aesthetic, February 13, 2005

By 

Panayotis ZAMAROS (Switzerland) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward A Critique of Marxist Aesthetics (Paperback)

Marcuse uses a critical approach, not to merely argue against a Marxist perspective on art, but rather to highlight the emancipatory potential in art. This is because its form is autonomous relative to a set of social relations, and insofar that `content becomes form' (p. 8), art is able to represent the prevailing and petrified un-freedom.

Against the perspective of a social construction of art, Marcuse capitalizes on the notion of "subjectivity" as the counter-force to ground his thesis. That is, `the radical qualities of art ... are grounded precisely in the dimensions where art transcends its social determination and emancipates itself from the given universe of discourse and behavior while preserving its overwhelming presence'. This is to say that art's emancipatory potential lies in its refusal to subjection, in its survival to preserve its subjectivity. Against maybe Adorno, for Marcuse this is the case because `art's separation from the process of material production' points to some unique qualities of art: its own language and dimension of affirmation and negation.

Despite the emancipatory potential, Marcuse is well aware that art cannot change the world but rather change consciousness, so as to hope for change the world: art is a means, and an effective one on condition that the tension between art and radical praxis is kept alive. This, however, should not be understood in a materialist sense, that the more emancipatory pieces of work are produced, the more likely to change the world is. Indeed, speaking of Goethe, Marcuse claims that `it is absurd to conclude that we need more Iphigenies' (p. 58) to express emancipatory humanism. Rather, this ideal transcends given praxis, along with social changes, hence a continuous need for such emancipatory art irrespective of materialist considerations.

If art for Marcuse fights reification, it also fights against the risk of "forgetting" by making the petrified world speak!This is to say, here is a worthy attempt to remind us of the importance of creativity in making a difference in our society!

2 of 19 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Despite the rating, an important book, December 18, 2004

By 

Avid Reader (Franklin, Tn) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward A Critique of Marxist Aesthetics (Paperback)

Give him a "5" for effort but a "0" for logic. Marcuse attempts the case for a sort of cultural Marxism - a society in which every single facet of human existence is politicized. I read this work (very short) some time ago and thought that few would take seriously these statements since they seem to contradict our basic beliefs about art, subjectivity and artistic freedom. Marcuse speaks with the conviction of the ideologue. His views of aesthetics mirror his views on the nature of mankind.

One must remember that Marcuse interprets other subjects in the same manner as he does aesthetics. For example, education is important only so far as it is political indoctrination. His views on art mirror those of Deconstructionism, the literary component of cultural Marxism. Both language and art are to be divorced from their source, interpreted by "experts" and judged by the degree to which they affect political thought. And this is the rub - in a Marcusian world, the purpose of art is not beauty or enjoyment but instead is the shaping of a collective, radical consciousness.

He calls for "standards" on judging art but one quickly discerns that those standards are NOT based on skill. style or technique. In other words, art is not judged on artistic but ideological standards. Artistic judgement has always been (except in dictatorships) a subjective act but then Marcuse has never been shy in advocating an authoritarian society that would "force" people to be free (shades of Chomsky). This is an enlightening book considering its enormous influence in academia.