7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Slamming the Door on the Gatekeeper State, November 16, 2008
This review is from: Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (New Approaches to African History) (Paperback)
This deceptively slim volume contains more good ideas and insights on Africa than any other book its size. The presentation is clear if somewhat dense, with just enough data and narrative to substitute for a survey text like K. Shillington's "History of Africa." But Cooper truly grasps the pulse of major African developments over several decades. His thesis that post-1960s independence was less a watershed than post-1940 developmentalism is a breakthrough, though Africans who lived the heady early days of nationhood may well differ. The emphasis on gatekeeper states--controlling access to critical resources but generally doing little for their citizens--will secure a permanent place in the literature. Scholars and general readers alike will learn a great deal here.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
African history, March 10, 2006
This review is from: Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present (New Approaches to African History) (Paperback)
This is a well-written, comprehensive and easy to read book. I highly recommend it for a student or general reader who wants to learn about the political climate in 20th Century Africa. This book is focused on trends and yet does a good job of differentiating between the different experiences across regions and countries of Africa.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Neoliberal "Gatekeeper" States, August 12, 2007
Prior to decolonization across the African Diaspora, colonial powers in Africa claimed that their superior management, scientific knowledge, experience and financial resources enabled them to transform backward Countries, under colonial occupation, into "modern states".
Such an arrogant argument, used by the North's beneficiaries of colonialism and imperialism was intended to justify the the continuation of imperialism and the new conditions of oppression in the African Diaspora.
Frederick Cooper in his book, Africa Since 1940, the Past of the Present, examined the development of African States, from decolonization up to the present. Not surprisingly Cooper found that the militaries, bureaucracies and institutional structures that the former colonial powers have bequeathed to their old colonies (since independence), have created only dependent, "gatekeeper" States.
Such "gatekeeper States" exist to protect the looting of their populations by their former colonial masters. Gatekeepers gain their legitimacy, after Independence, primarily through their former exploiting "mother countries" and in many cases their sovereignty is recognized more from the outside rather than from within.
Cooper clarifies America's role in decolonization and the creation of the new conditions of oppression in the former colonies. Washington's policy makers, from as early as 1943, pressured European powers to decolonize Africa, but only in a superficial, incremental manner that would not result in meaningful self-determination for the people.
Washington's approach to decolonization was therefore "Strategic." This strategic method was less concerned with "correctly solving the problem [of colonial oppression] than with making an advance" (or merely its appearance). Making an "advance," conceivably would pacify growing public pressure in the USA, which was emboldened by the domestic anti-colonial movement and Civil Rights movement.
Cooper's book will be useful to a wide range of general readers, including students of African History, Political Science and those concerned with the failed policies of neoliberal globalization in the African Diaspora.
See also:
In-Dependence from Bondage: Claude McKay and Michael Manley: Defying the Ideological Clash and Policy Gaps in African Diaspora Relations
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No