Against All Gods and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy New
$13.48
Qty:1
  • List Price: $15.00
  • Save: $1.52 (10%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 14 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Against All Gods: What's Right and Wrong About the New Atheism Paperback – March 18, 2010


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$13.48
$3.74 $3.46

Frequently Bought Together

Against All Gods: What's Right and Wrong About the New Atheism + I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist
Price for both: $24.49

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Image
Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 119 pages
  • Publisher: IVP Books (March 18, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0830837388
  • ISBN-13: 978-0830837380
  • Product Dimensions: 0.4 x 5.2 x 7.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (17 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #180,345 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"What a wonderful little book. Johnson and Reynolds offer a clear, readable and intelligent critique of the new atheism. But they offer something more: joy, hope and love. You get both the reason and the romance of the Christian story. So the new atheism comes across not so much as wrong, but as one-dimensional and childish, a sort of intellectual pornography claiming to be true love. Johnson and Reynolds's complementary combination of intellectual and theological virtues is a fire that both warms and purifies." (Francis J. Beckwith, professor of philosophy and church-state studies, Baylor University)

"Rather than engaging in specific critiques of the new atheism, Phil Johnson and John Mark Reynolds add their voices to the increasing scholarly chorus that decries the real oppressor in these and related discussions: unexamined naturalistic presuppositions that reject alternative ideas without a hearing. Declaring that uncritical attitudes and a lack of appreciation for ancient writings lie behind many recent criticisms of Christianity, the authors call for open discussion of the relevant issues. This volume is a treat to read, featuring a succinct, straightforward and easily digestible text that successfully treats issue after issue." (Gary R. Habermas, Distinguished Research Professor, Liberty University and Theological Seminary)

"This superb work by Phillip E. Johnson and John Mark Reynolds is both an informed response to the new atheism and simultaneously an invitation for ongoing conversation with those who question the truth claims of the Christian faith. I have longed to have a volume like this one to share with my colleagues in the world of higher education. Against All Gods is timely, convincing, readable and accessible; it is a privilege to recommend this little book to a wide audience, with the hope that it will find its way into the hands of university students across the land." (David S. Dockery, president, Union University)

"Johnson and Reynolds are provocateurs in the best sense of that word, and Against All Gods is sure to arouse considerable debate and reflection. This is not another apologetic response to the new atheists. It is a cultural analysis and critique of their claims. It reads like a detective novel and conveys powerful, important ideas to the reader. I couldn't put it down." (J. P. Moreland, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Biola University, and author of The God Question)

About the Author

Phillip E. Johnson taught law for more than thirty years at the University of California--Berkeley where he is professor emeritus. He is recognized as a leading spokesman for the intelligent design movement, and is the author of many books, including Darwin on Trial, Reason in the Balance and Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds.

John Mark Reynolds (Ph.D., University of Rochester) is the provost at Houston Baptist University and the founder and director of the Torrey Honors Institute. Reynolds lectures frequently on ancient philosophy, philosophy of science, home schooling and cultural trends. He has taught philosophy at several colleges and universities, and he completed a two-year postdoctoral fellowship in the philosophy of science at Biola University. He regularly appears on radio talk shows, such as the Hugh Hewitt Show, and actively blogs on cultural issues at patheos.com and for the Washington Post's online column On Faith. His books include Three Views on Creation and Evolution(Zondervan) and The Great Books Reader (Bethany House).

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
5 star
11
4 star
3
3 star
2
2 star
0
1 star
1
See all 17 customer reviews
And this is a GOOD thing for the authors of this book.
A. Morgan
Johnson will at the very least seriously challenge anyone who reads him sincerely.
Reviewer
These views are worldviews and, as such, color the way one sees reality.
Darwin Researcher

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

32 of 38 people found the following review helpful By Stephen on June 6, 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Against All Gods: What's Right and Wrong About the New Atheism is a small book packed with big ideas. Co-authored by the eminent law professor, Philip E. Johnson (Darwin on Trial) and professor of philosophy, John Mark Reynolds (When Athens Met Jerusalem), this volume engages with the cultural influence of the so-called `New Atheists', folks like Richard Dawkins, Chris Hitchens and Daniel Dennett. It is the authors' contention that even though the New Atheists' attitude towards theism and Christianity in particular is overwhelmingly hostile and their conclusions incorrect, they are asking the right questions. Johnson and Reynolds happily point out that these attacks have made belief in any religion an issue again for public debate and so rather than be disheartened we Christians should seize this opportunity to present and defend the Gospels within the intellectual arena.

Johnson authors the first five essays along with the introduction and epilogue and Reynolds contributes the remaining three essays. I will not discuss all eight essays, but merely my five favorites (3 by Johnson, 2 by Reynolds) Johnson introduces the New Atheism as old arguments whose only new element is the evangelical fervor with which their advocates preach the gospel of disbelief, actively seeking converts. Not content with simply overthrowing belief in the existence of God, the New Atheists view theism as a malevolent force that ought to be stamped out entirely to make way for an atheistic utopia, founded according to the providences of secular reason and scientific naturalism. Ironically, Johnson welcomes such a blistering attack because for far too long, religion has been largely ignored within academia as a subject not worth talking about anymore.
Read more ›
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
18 of 23 people found the following review helpful By OC Philosopher on April 5, 2010
Format: Paperback
This book is quick, enjoyable, and helpful enough that anyone interested in discussing the competing worldviews of naturalism and theism ought to read it. Johnson and Reynolds obviously know which side of the debate they are on, but this book is more of a primer the debate than a showcase of the debate itself. Johnson spends the first five chapters focusing on ways that the New Atheists are moving a bit too fast and loose in their arguments. He claims that they are both developing their own worldview without scrutinizing its foundations, and then criticizing other worldviews without understanding their foundations. Of course, the same might be said of some branches of theism, but this book serves as a primer on debate through a light critique of the New Atheists, so it is only natural the New Atheists supply the examples. Reynolds then goes on to provide a more positive account of how the New Atheists could give their intellectual foils a fairer hearing, namely, by giving due regard for sensible interpretations of Scripture and accepting the historically positive influence of religion on society and education. Though Reynolds' portion feels more like traditional apologetics, I would say that it still falls under the project's scope of being a primer--after all, if you don't respect your opponent or know how to listen to them, you can never argue with them. By the end, you can really sense that these two professors are gentlemen, and that the public square could benefit from their cue.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By Paul Vjecsner on November 12, 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The authors make frank admissions of their restricted knowledge, but a good case for reliance on faith in all life's endeavors where knowledge is absent.

Phillip Johnson writes (p.33): "Scientists in particular have to be men and women of faith... To be successful, scientists have to learn not to allow difficulties to destroy their confidence... Yet there is a limit. Sometimes repeated failure is a sign that reaching a goal by the means one has been using truly is impossible... Alchemists had faith that they could transform base metals to gold, but their persistence after lifetimes of failure made them seem ridiculous rather than heroic. I sometimes think of alchemy when reading of the constantly unsuccessful efforts of modern scientists to determine how nonliving chemicals combined by natural means on the early Earth to form the first living cells."

Correspondingly, he writes (p.34): "many scientists today have an absolute faith in naturalism". "On this assumption every natural phenomenon, like the origin of life, for example, is securely known to be explicable on the basis of natural causes accessible to scientific investigation--some combination of chemical laws and chance, to be more specific."

I may add further thoughts here. "[C]ombination of chemical laws and chance" is itself confusing, inasmuch as "chance" is equally the expression of such laws. However, science's presumption of "natural" causes as confined to physical or chemical laws consists of an enormous oversight. The very subject of life concerned here exhibits a natural phenomenon unexplained by only physical or chemical laws, which are understood as undirected and therefore excluding the possibility of goal-directedness, purpose, in nature.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
18 of 23 people found the following review helpful By George P. Wood TOP 1000 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on April 20, 2010
Format: Paperback
Toward the end of Against All Gods, Phillip Johnson writes this: "[E]very position about the nature of life and its origin has difficulties. Therefore, the question is not whether we can find a position that has no difficulties, but rather, which set of difficulties we prefer to embrace."

For several years now, the "New Atheists" have highlighted what they believe are the "difficulties" in theistic worldviews, especially the Christian theistic worldview. For many of them, rationality is more or less identical to the deliverances of science, and what science delivers most clearly is evolution. Since evolution explains the biological complexity of the universe without reference to God, God is an unnecessary hypothesis. Continuing belief in him, then, is an exercise of irrational faith.

Johnson and Reynolds push back against these conclusions by pointing out several difficulties within the "Darwinian worldview" itself. Among other things, they point out that faith is not irrational. Rather, it is human, a necessary component for all human intellectual endeavors. Further, the deliverances of science cannot determine once for all the nonexistence of God since those deliverances shift over time. Also, if the Darwinian worldview acts as a "universal acid" on traditional beliefs - the phrase is Daniel Dennett's - then it acts as a universal acid on all beliefs. If there is an evolutionary explanation for belief in God, then there is also an evolutionary explanation for belief in evolution. If the evolutionary explanation invalidates the former, it invalidates the latter as well.

One needn't agree with Johnson and Reynolds' Christian theism, as I do, to appreciate the difficulties with atheism they raise in this small book.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?