Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
31 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Cautionary Tale about the Dark Side of the Internet, February 3, 2008
In Against the Machine, Lee Siegel has written a devastating critique of the Internet--its destructive side and how it is adversely reshaping our thoughts about ourselves, other people, and the world around us.
In "Thus Spoke Zarathustra," the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche wrote: "Alas, the time of the most despicable man is coming. The earth has become small, and on it hops the last man, who makes everything small. His race is as ineradicable as the flea, Everybody wants the same, everybody is the same: whoever feels different goes voluntarily into a madhouse. . . . 'We have invented happiness,' say the last men, and they blink."
Siegel believes this "brave new world" is now: On the Internet, he asserts, "you must sound more like everyone else than anyone else is able to sound like everyone else." Such a vapid transvaluation of values, he asserts, has disastrous effects on our culture, our politics, and our psyches.
The Internet, says Siegel, creates a surreal virtual reality "where the rhetoric of democracy, freedom, and access is often a fig leaf for antidemocratic and coercive rhetoric; where commercial ambitions dress up in the sheep's clothing of humanistic values; and were, ironically, technology has turned back the clock from disinterested enjoyment of high and popular art to a primitive culture of crude, grasping self-interest."
In this strange, upside-down world, talent, expertise, and originality have been replaced by popularity, genuine knowledge has been crowded out by information overload, and true democracy has been undermined by the creation of solipsistic egos isolated from social and political structures and vulnerable to demagogic lies and deceit. Thus is fulfilled Nietzsche's prophecy of the advent of the mob-self who denigrates excellence and elevates the ephemeral, the trivial, the banal, and the mediocre.
Against the Machine is a smash-mouth, no-holds-barred, take-no-prisoners cautionary tale about the dark side of the Internet. Refusing to be intimidated by pollyannish Internet boosterism, this provocative book dares cry out that the "imperial" Internet has no clothes. In other words, it's "unsafe at any speed."
Siegel's thesis may seem exaggerated, but his hyperbole serves as a needed, and courageous, warning against soceity's increasing reliance upon the Internet.
Lee Siegel is the author of the essay collections Falling Upwards and Not Remotely Controlled. In 2002 he received the National Magazine Award for Reviews and Criticism. He lives in Brooklyn with his wife and son.
|
|
|
23 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A screed against the digital age, January 28, 2008
What are the impacts of Internet technologies on culture and sociality? This weighty and timely question is the one this book attempts to address, but it falls short of being a considered, balanced and serious examination of this topic.
The overall tone of this book by disgraced former New Republic editor and blogger Lee Siegel is of a personal critique against the twinning of digital environments and commerce. Some of its best points are made when Siegel demonstrates his capacity to think deeply on the issues he is concerned about. Sadly, these parts of the book are rare and for this reason, among others, this book is not for use by serious scholars of digital ontology or of the consequences of the digitization of human life.
The book raises interesting points about the performance of privacy online, the rise of the importance of information for its own sake and the popularity contest that is the blogosphere. However, the often snarky tone and rather blatant one-sided presentations leech Mr. Siegel's arguments of their ability to make a difference in the discourse of what the Internet's impacts are now and for the future. The most egregious problem the book has is its reification of its topic center. Mr. Siegel writes about "The Internet" as if the global digital network were a single person, with independent volition and agency. He blames the Internet for several consequences of 21st century life, forgetting as he does so that the larger western culture is the real root and agent of those issues. At several points and most notably in part two, he presents arguments about mass culture, high and low culture, the rise of rationalized individuality, etcetera that suggest that the cultural and social impoverishment and bastardization he speaks of are new to modern life and that the Internet is to blame. He does not exhibit any awareness of the large cadre of philosphers and scholars who have written about these topics for the last few hundred years, since the dawn of industrialization (Theodor Adorno comes to mind as just one example).
While this book is supposed to be a single cohesive book, at times it reads more like an edited collection of opinion essays written at different periods in Mr. Siegel's career, with the tone switching from personal and casual, with self-references and contractions, to third person and serious. Admittedly, if one knows Mr. Siegel's past history of digital participation, the slant in the book becomes glaringly obvious and the reader is left to wonder if the tone and overarching message would have been different if the blogosphere had been kinder to the man? Do read this book if you are interested in the impacts of digital culture on humanity, but expect to be more entertained then enlightened. And given Mr. Siegel's diatribes against exactly this outcome in modern public culture, one is left to wonder if this is deliberate on his part? An ultimate proving of his point?
|
|
|
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Great Digital Unwashed, March 24, 2008
This book, as the title suggests, is about the negative and destructive aspects of the Internet. Many of us, even true believers, have always felt instinctively that it was not all good. From the outset it should be noted that cultural critic Lee Siegel is keenly aware of its power. He writes that "the Internet is possibly the most radical transformation of private and public life in the history of humankind." He likens the Internet to the automobile in the 1950's in that it is considered a symbol and an instrument of "freedom, democracy, choice, and access." It was not until the 1960's that the shortcomings and the dangers of the automobile were exposed by Ralph Nadar. Lee Siegel has taken it upon himself to be the Ralph Nadar of the Internet. Although we've heard many of his arguments before, he delivers them with a certain anger, a "rage against the machine."
Siegel opens his discussion with a scene in Starbucks where everyone is sitting speechless - if not on cellphone - in front of their laptops. Everyone is trying to achieve "connectivity" with the World Wide Web. What Siegel sees is disconnectedness and isolation. Social-networking sites, for example, are a contradiction in terms. They are asocial and atomizing. How can members of Facebook and MySpace have thousands of "friends." What are the consequences for real friendships? Siegel asks all the pertinent questions, even though he doesn't have all the answers.
Siegel has a special axe to grind with Malcolm Gladwell, author of The Tipping Point. He charges that Gladwell has made popularity the sole criterion for success. The Internet is keeping us at the level of high school, where popularity or "page views" is more important than originality or creativity. Webheads strive to be more like everyone else than anyone else. He cites "American Idol" as another example of contemporary mindlessness. The most successful performers are the best imitators.
Siegel wonders what effect 50,000 new blogs daily (presumably this one included) has on our culture. With the shear volume of information, knowledge becomes elusive. It becomes more difficult to separate rumor from truth. Reality shows are staged, some documentaries are staged, how long before the news is staged? Siegel argues that the blogosphere has a deteriorating effect on "fairness, honesty, and accuracy." Webheads will find that many of his arguments are difficult to refute.
As a professional journalist, Siegel laments the disappearance of the editorial standards of traditional print media, even though they too were imperfect. He also denounces the superficial freedom and democracy that the blogosphere claims for itself. Although his sentiments ring true, there is nothing that can or should be done about the electronic mob from above. Cultural gatekeepers are a thing of the past. We can only hope that the great digital unwashed can sort things out from the bottom up, and that truth and justice prevail.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|