| ||||||||||||||||||
"This author provides a great service to modern and postmodern philosphers of science who are held at somewhat of a distance by the writing styles of their counterparts...Norris' survey is extensive...it is wonderful at bringing out how postmodern discussions of language and ontology can be sewn into the fabric of arguments grounded in the assumptions of the Received View." J.F.Metcalfe, Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, Vol.39, No.3
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
29 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Deconstructionist deconstruction,
By Benjamin Rossen "Benjamin" (Netherlands) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Against Relativism: Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction, and Critical Theory (Hardcover)
Christopher Norris, once called "a prominent second rung deconstructionist..." by Roger Kimball, is nevertheless, among writers allied to the postmodern movement, more critical than most. This book is not an easy read for the author has the habit of alluding to rather than explaining the views he argues for and against. Norris has mastered a large corpus of postmodern work, genuinely striving to find something of value in it. He detects traces of critical analytical thought behind the smoke screens of obscurantism in the writings of Derrida, for example, and balances his arguments by emphasizing these. He argues that postmodern writers have encountered the same philosophical problems grappled by philosophers throughout history; it is the method, language and conclusions of postmodernists which set them apart; which, one is forced to conclude, does not leave much of value. Unfortunately Professor Norris has absorbed a great deal of the language-salad jargon of postmodernism and generously attached to that terminology respectable philosophical notions which might not be shared by many. He uses phrases such as "linguistic tropes" and "genealogies of ideas" along side "synthetic/analytic distinction" and "empirical methodology", as if they were expressions of equally valid philosophical notions. The term "suasive" is used when "persuasive" would have done just fine. This kind of thing, and the book is peppered with it, makes reading "Against Relativism" heavy going. It is worth the effort, however, for the encompassing analysis Christopher Norris provides and for the insights it gives into the shreds of meaning that can be wrung from some postmodern work.
0 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Relativism,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Against Relativism: Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction, and Critical Theory (Paperback)
Am extremely grateful for the time the author put into making this an outstanding book. A book of substance that engages the reader, towards a proactive paradigm evaluation of their own interaction with their own thinking involving how much society determines how we (Christians) perceive life and Holy Scripture and how followers of Jesus can make that decisive change brought on by having an introspective life style change in thought and external interaction in society.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|