Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Buy Used
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: A well-cared-for item that has seen limited use but remains in great condition. The item is complete, unmarked, and undamaged, but may show some limited signs of wear. Item works perfectly.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Against Thrift: Why Consumer Culture is Good for the Economy, the Environment, and Your Soul Hardcover – November 22, 2011

2.8 out of 5 stars 24 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
New from Used from
"Please retry"
Hardcover, November 22, 2011
$0.49 $0.01

Best Books of the Month
See the Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Editorial Reviews


Benjamin Kunkel, author of Indecision and founding editor of n +1
“While madmen in authority declare a new age of austerity, James Livingston has—in the best American tradition—written a radically commonsensical and scandalously good-natured ode to abundance. Against Thrift seems to me easily the most original and potentially the most important book yet to emerge from the ongoing economic crisis.”

Jeff Madrick, author of Age of Greed and editor of Challenge
“I can't say that I agree with every word in James Livingston's  Against Thrift.  But to say it is original and intelligent are understatements.  It is a joy to welcome so refreshing a set of arguments to the public discourse. He has the audacity to make a case for consumption. He takes on one piece of conventional wisdom after another. And it is all so darned readable. I disagree, I kept saying to myself, but sometimes I agreed that I disagreed, and I always kept reading.  I even occasionally changed my mind, and that's too rare an event for any of us.”
David Levering Lewis, Professor of History, New York University and Pulitzer-Prize winning biographer
“As a historian of large social systems, I find James Livingston's Against Thrift interpretively stunning. If the book's thesis is correct, the American future is hostage to a demonstrably outmoded growth paradigm of gross maldistribution of wealth and avoidable cyclical market chaos…The timely publication of Against Thrift is virtually a public service.”
Marc Chandler, Chief Global Currency Strategist, Brown Brothers Harriman
“Against Thrift is the first fully articulated alternative to the conventional thinking that created the financial crisis and inhibits the recovery. Livingston has written a masterpiece—an interdisciplinary narrative, rooted in American tradition. It should be read and studied by investors and policy makers alike. It is both revolutionary and conservative at the same time, so it is a useful antidote to the poison that is all too often offered as a cure by both the Left and Right. If Wall Street and Washington took Livingston's views to heart, the crisis would end, and America's role as the ‘indispensable nation’ would be restored.”
Justin Fox, author, The Myth of the Rational Market
“Karl Marx wants you to go shopping. To save capitalism. With this mind-bendingly provocative book, Jim Livingston is out to convince you that almost everything mainstream economists say about the Great Recession is wrong. He might just succeed.”
Publisher’s Weekly
“[Livingston] makes a persuasive case for consumer culture: why it’s actually good for the economy, the environment, and our souls….His research and reasoning is remarkable.”

About the Author

James Livingston is a Professor of History at Rutgers University. He is the author of four previous books and a regular contributor to the History News Network. He lives in New York City.

Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Basic Books (November 22, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0465021867
  • ISBN-13: 978-0465021864
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 1.1 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (24 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #842,693 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

James Livingston has taught history at Rutgers since 1988. Before then, he taught at a community college, a maximum-security prison, a small liberal-arts college, and three state universities. He's the author of five books, beginning with Origins of the Federal Reserve System (1986), on topics in economic, intellectual, social, and cultural history. His published essays include studies of Shakespeare, banking reform, cartoon politics, pragmatism, diplomatic history, Marxism, slavery and modernity, feminism, corporations and cultural studies, psychoanalysis, capitalism and socialism. He lives in New York City.

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
I bought this book because I heard a little bit about it and liked how contrarian it sounded. People on the right in this country probably won't like the first half of the book, and people on the left (where I reside) probably won't like the second. Of course, I breezed through the first seventy pages, which challenged very few of my original assumptions, and found the second half to be a complete slog. Ultimately, Livingston's basic argument -that a redistribution of wealth to a larger swath of society is necessary for economic growth, and that the consumer society this would support isn't pure evil- is defensible. But I don't think Livingston does a very good job of defending it.

First, I'm surprised to see how little attention the writing in this book has received. I graduated from college, had pretty good grades, and read (and wrote) a lot of stuff on political economy, and there were still dozens of paragraphs in this book that I had to re-read and comb for any trace of actual meaning. This is postmodern academic writing at its worst. Livingston throws in five-dollar words every chance he can get, and seems to have trouble simplifying or summarizing anything. He makes frequent use of the device of ending every other paragraph with a string of rhetorical questions. He answers some of these questions, but his solutions are never clear or concise, and at times it felt like his arguments were vague and verbose because they'd be so easily dismissed if they were anything else.

To address some of the arguments he's making: is advertising good for society?
Read more ›
1 Comment 28 of 31 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Now that reading books before talking and writing about them is no longer fashionable, I feel out of place offering my own opinion on Livingston's latest. Still, I think some kind of clarification is in order before this page is overrun by either our keeper's-of-the-faith in rational/instrumental/universal economic theory, or worse, just plain (patriotic) insanity. I have read the book, by the way, and it's a terrific achievement. It's not only the best available on the current economic dilemmas of our time, it considers these crises as moral and cultural revolutions of the long 20th century; they are still in the making, whose meanings and outcomes haven't been decided. This kind of formidable task requires, among other things, an intricate understanding of the history, thoughtful and nuanced arguments, and clarity. All of which, to be sure, Livingston possesses in abundance. As such, this book can be put into any number of categories, and this is its strength. The author's command of the subject is staggering as he moves easily among Left and Right arguments against an economy based on consumer culture (treating all with respect-"fair and balanced"), and navigates a passage of his own that locates an optimistic based on the democratizing and socializing possibilities consumer spending/culture.

Let's correct something: The author DOES NOT say that if you're under a mountain of debt you should keep swiping that card of yours. He DOES NOT say we need a giant state apparatus to direct all our economic decisions. And he IS NOT anti-capitalist. In fact, he says that markets and functioning democracy are conditions of each other. Look, individuals already "redistribute" their wealth in this country through taxes.
Read more ›
1 Comment 43 of 55 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
I caught the tail end of a radio interview with the author, and was quite intrigued by the little bit that I heard. As another reviewer wrote, I am generally intrigued by contrarian perspectives--from what I heard on the radio, Livingston was not merely contrarian but also arguing sensibly, and as a bonus, entertainingly.

Sadly, I am rather disappointed in the book, so disappointed that I am not bothering to read past the first few chapters. I take Livingston at his word in his opening that to convince us of his perspective in the second half of the book, he first must convince us of the flaws in other, more conventional, perspectives. If that structure is necessary, as he says it is, then he is utterly failing in his first-half effort so I'm not bothering to read on to his second half.

The main flaw in his first-half effort is that he conflates the arguments of others, and replaces their actual arguments with similar-sounding straw-man arguments. For example, in arguing against the idea that failure-to-act by regulators was a leading contributor to the current economic crisis, Livingston quotes Dean Baker's assertion of regulatory failure, but then ignores the details of Baker's full argument (e.g., exactly which regulators failed in what ways at what times, and why those in/actions constituted failure). Instead, Livingston glosses over Baker's extensive arguments and, in the space of a few short paragraphs, pseudo-paraphrases them in such a way that he (Livingston) can then seem to easily rebut them.

Another disappointing feature for me has to do with Livingston's tone in the portion of the book that I read.
Read more ›
3 Comments 18 of 23 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Want to discover more products? Check out this page to see more: income inequality