| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
30 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Considers the written and archealogical records together.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: An Age of Tyrants: Britain and the Britons, A.D. 400-600 (Paperback)
A very even-handed account of Sub-Roman Britain. Beginning with a review of the contemporary written sources, the author provides a new and insightful method of studying this Dark Age society through their use of common and important words such as "civitas" and "tyranni".After getting the most from the few written works available from both inside and outside Britain, the second half of the book considers the archealogical record of period. This part alone is an excellent overview of the latest knowledge which the archealogist's trowel has been able to bring to bear on the period. Orgainized in categories such as cities and religious sites, the book considers Sub-Roman patterns of site usage throughout the country rather than focusing on a site-by-site survey. Very accessible reading which leaves you wishing for more.
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Important Book,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: An Age of Tyrants: Britain and the Britons, A.D. 400-600 (Paperback)
It is very refreshing to read a book about this period of British history that is not obsessed with the Arthurian legend, interesting though that is. Mr Snyder uses the little written evidence there is from the 410-600AD period to try and form a picture of the conditions at the time. The second part of the book discusses the archaeological evidence in depth and the final part constructs a coherent picture of what life must have been like in post Roman Britain using the evidence of the first two sections. Arthur and Merlin are mentioned in an appendix and at a few points within the text but only to point out that the historical evidence cannot say one way or the other whether these personalities existed.Mr Snyder has settled on the title "An Age of Tyrants" to describe the era as being preferrable to "Sub-Roman Britain". I'm not sure if this title is adequate but it is superior to the somewhat demeaning "Sub-Roman" description. This period was clearly not as savage as has previously been thought. My only minor criticism is that I would have preferred to see more illustrations of the archaeological sites and artefacts but overall I found this an extremely interesting book that was difficult to put down.
25 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Thorough survey of 5th and 6th Century Britain.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: An Age of Tyrants: Britain and the Britons, A.D. 400-600 (Paperback)
Snyder provides a thorough survey and sound evaluation of the documentary and archaeological evidence for the Fifth and Sixth Centuries in Britain. These two centuries are the "lost" period in British history, lying between the better-known Roman and Anglo-Saxon periods. Snyder provides insight into a period of great changes and adaptations, showing how Roman era political and social institutions and concepts were transformed to deal with altered circumstances. In a sense, Snyder's work could be seen as a partial update of the invaluable _Arthur's Britain_ by Leslie Alcock. "Partial" because Snyder intentionally deals only with those surviving documents that are contemporary to the period (e.g., St. Patrick, Gildas, Life of Saint Germanus). He deliberately avoids the accounts of this period which were written in slightly later times (e.g., Bede, Annales Cambriae, Nennius, Anglo-Saxon Chronicle). These later sources are based upon early documents (since lost) and oral tradition, and are therefore more problematic than the contemporary documents. Snyder thus carefully avoids the controversy surrounding the question of the historical basis for the King Arthur legend. This omission does not, however, render his work less valuable to Arthurian enthusiasts; to the contrary, it provides a firm factual foundation from which those daring souls may approach the more problematic material and tackle the Arthurian controversy
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|