| |||||||||||||||
Alan Greenspan has been the single most powerful figure affecting the global economy since 1987. He had substantial influence before then as an economic adviser to Presidents Richard M. Nixon and Gerald Ford. Even retired, he will remain an important political force. He has been called apolitical, someone so detached from politics that he can always be trusted. Above all, he is the detached observer subservient to no political motive or operative. He is pure. He wants also to maintain the purity of the Federal Reserve System so as to insulate the Fed from the influence of politicians, who surely cannot be trusted.
Greenspans purityas with most self-consciously persistent claimsis a myth. Moreover, as we will come to know, the purity of the Federal Reserve System is a sham. In the instance of Mr. Greenspan, "purity" generally has meant selfless dedication to an objective view of economic conditions untarnished by decisions benefiting special interests. To the contrary, we best understand this wizard behind the veil of money through a realistic understanding of his aims as well as the supra-natural instincts of the Federal Reserve System. But, first, let us consider Greenspan.
Greenspans policies have always been directed at the protection of the greatest financial wealth holders. Whether it is dealing with stock market bubbles, currency crises or the bailout of giant financial institutions, his actions and those of the Federal Reserve generally have been forces shifting the income and wealth of Americans toward the top and away from the bottom and middle classes. Only through this prism can his policy positions and those inherited by his successor be understood. These effects go beyond the United States; it is a global strategy carried out not only though the Fed, but through multinational financial institutions, including the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and private hedge funds. The Federal Reserve and the wizard have a unified defense for such policies: A central bank cant influence the configurations of family incomes and wealth. This is simply and categorically wrong.
Maestro Greenspans background ideally prepared him for his historic conducting of monetary policy. From his early days in New York City he quietly groomed himself for the uncompromising ideological stance he would take. Because of the imprint he leaves at the Federal Reserve, a shift in direction will require two things: the selection of a chair of opposite ideological leanings (unlikely in the age of President George W. Bush) and a severing of the intimate ties of the American central bank to the American and global financial community. Because of the co-dependency of the twothe setting of financial policy by the Fed and the use of financial markets to conduct these policies institutional reformwill require progressive forces at least as strong and effective as present day neoconservatism. We turn now to the maestro, the wizard, the oracle, and the Popes inevitability.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
0 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Same Old Story - "Who's On First?",
By
This review is from: Alan Greenspan: The Oracle Behind the Curtain (Hardcover)
I read this book twice to make sure I understood. It is very readable and enjoyable, as much as one can enjoy any of the usual conspiracy theory books which abound, today. At least this is a scholarly conspiracy theory book.
Let's look at the book in a few short sentences, via the Lenses of Political Machinations, Historical Insight and Cynical Squint. How does our present day political contest appear when translated by this book? The McCain is his usual cynical self. It's OK to pander to the anti-Castroites and give them a few "Cuba Libre" salutes in Florida -- how else does anyone obtain votes down there? After he is elected, all bets are off, just as in every political race. He has some muddled ideas about how to fix the financial system, but in the end will rely upon another Greenspan. Hussein Obama is, of course, a liberal and a sycophant of the Marcuse theory of "democracy". In his mind, you sleep with the Devil (and enjoy the Hell out of it) and get what you want. Now what be happening when Obama be President? Pretty much what happened when political scientists studied the regimes of LBJ, HST, and FDR. A number of studies were made in the late 1990's which attempted to show how much disaster a far-left President could create by his Supreme Court appointments and by his pushing the Congress to do his liberal bidding. You might be surprised that LBJ came out on top as the most liberal social activist president. Aha, you say, but what about Carter and his Global yada yada? Nie'chevo, as Lenin would have said -- nada on his yada. Compare LBJ -- a deep-south mentality pork-barrel politician of the Kingfish genre (Louisiana, not Amos 'n Andy) -- with Carter. LBJ's social activism and program have historically far outweighed anything which Carter attempted. Carter was small peanuts compared to the socialism of LBJ. Long story made short, we wouldn't be in the African-American culture crisis we are in today except for LBJ and "The Great Society". You will probably not be surprised that FDR came out on top as the most liberal fiscal policy activist president. Long story made short, we wouldn't be in the Social Security mess we are in today except for FDR and his interpretation of Keynes' theories. President Obama will be Just Another Liberal, who will tinker around with Keynes, tossing out any vestiges of Reagan's Macroeconomics. He will appoint at least two and perhaps as many as four Supreme Court Justices during his eight years. Justices all held up to the Liberal Standards of the Democratic Party 2001, of course. The coupe d'main will be the Supremo's interpretation of the US Constitution's interpretation by the previous liberal court's interpretation by the previous liberal court's interpretation. The book is too expensive. I was going to purchase it, but checked it out from the library, instead. As for me, I am voting for Judge Judy. Dave
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|