12 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
"Must" reading for all students of Albert Camus' philosophy., September 7, 2000
This review is from: Albert Camus & the Minister (Paperback)
Howard Mumma first met and befriended Noble prize-winner, writer, and philosopher Albert Camus while Mumma was serving as guest preacher at the American Church in Paris in the late 1950s. Albert Camus And The Minister is the story of their conversations, often laced with humor, on such topics as existential philosophy, Christianity, personal conscience, the Bible, the ideology of war, human suffering, and more. Highly recommended reading for students of twentieth century philosophy, Albert Camus And The Minister also presents personal stories, significant events, and acts of faith from Mumma's own experience which provide a glimpse into the life and background of a man fortunate enough to have a meaningful and enduring intellectual relationship with the late Albert Camus, one of the most influential thinkers of his day.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Flawed and Beautiful, August 27, 2007
This review is from: Albert Camus & the Minister (Paperback)
Mumma in the foreword acknowledges his bias and inaccuracy (he wrote the book almost 40 years after Camus' death, and was around 90 at its publishing). One cannot take the book in a 100% literal fashion - there are clear victims of inaccuracy in the text. However, the story as a whole is an excellent narrative of the existential struggle between the two extremes of Jean-Paul Sartre's thoughts and Mumma's Christianity, with Albert Camus' frustration with the universe straddling the chasm.
On another note, it is impossible to verify the book, Mumma notes that Camus did not want to be identified with a Methodist "priest". In the text, when speaking over dinner, Camus shuns any and all publicity. It is clear that these conversations were never intended to be public - and Camus and his biographers did not mention it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mixed Feelings, September 8, 2006
This review is from: Albert Camus & the Minister (Paperback)
I'm no stranger to reviewing books. I normally find it easy to write a brief one or two assesment of a book. But my feelings about "Albert Camus and the Minister" by Howard Mumma are very complex and I struggle to write a descent review of this book.
The first 90 pages which cover a growing friendship between Camus and Mumma is clearly the most interesting part of the book. The rest is a collection of life experiences that were meaningful to Mumma. These experiences are not dull, but I found them to be a bit disconnected from the first 90 pages. One of the most entertaining points of this book is where Camus asks for baptism, but Mumma rejects it on the grounds that (A) Camus had already been baptised as an infant and (B) he wasn't willing to join the church or make it a public event. He ends up regreting that stand a bit, especially on reflecting on the fact that it was his final meeting with Camus. It was also neat to read about Camus' enthusiasm in studying the Bible.
Mumma holds a view of the Bible which relegates The Fall to allegorical tale and he certainly doesn't have an evangelical view of the inspiration of scripture. While coming from that platform might have made agreement with Camus a bit easier, I believe Mumma would have had some more meaningful answers to Camus' questions if he actually had a view of the Bible which validates using it as an authorative source. In some senses, from a thoroughly evangelical Christian prespective, Mumma wasn't offering Camus something much better than he already had. Sure, Mumma presented some God talk, but did he present the gospel to Camus as something that is "true truth" not just "religious truth"?
I sympathise with the views other reviewers who are quite critical of this book. While I hope and trust Mumma has recorded things accurately, there are a few things which make me wonder. First, some of his recollections (he admits plainly that they are recollections and may not be 100% accurate) portray the conversations as rather simplistic--with most of the dialogs turning out to be more "gentle" and successful from Mumma's perspective than one would expect when an Existentialist and a Christian minister would get together. Second, I don't know enough about Camus to verify it, but some other reviewers bring up interesting comments that Mumma seems to have gotten some of Camus' biographical details wrong. Third, Camus seeking truth is quite believable, but requesting adult baptism? That seems a bit far fetched. As another reviewer noted, it is notable that the accuracy of first 90 pages of the books can not be verified. This problem is further compounded by the fact that Mumma shares that Camus was secretive about it--he requested specifically that his inquiries be kept secret (this make this book a betrayal of sorts).
I will not go to the length to say I think Mumma invented the dialogs (as some reviewers have suggested), but I think I reader should approach it with some caution and be prepared to accept that at the very least some of the dialogs may not have been recorded completely accurately.
So, if you have been following me so far, you should find that my response to this book is both positive and negative. I don't regret having read it, though. The first 90 pages are interesting even if we are to suppose that they are totally fictional. This book might be worth getting if the reviews so far intruige you. I'll just advise you that you shouldn't expect Mumma to be an evangelical nor should you expect any of the recollections in this book to be easily verifiable.
I'm left wondering what would be the outcome if Camus had spent this time with an evangelical (such as Francis Schaeffer or OS Guinness) instead of one who has accepted most of the doctrinal positions of the "liberal" movement.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
