| |||||||||||||||
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Unreliable...for general reader...a starter, not final goal.,
By "acominatus" (Johnson City, TN United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Alexandria: City of the Western Mind (Hardcover)
One wants to like a book that one has spent some dealof money to have bought. Perhaps one should also do a bit more intensive reading in the book before one purchases it. "Let the buyer beware." This is a book for the general reader, not for the scholar, nor for anyone who wants reliable information reliably presented. The first perplexing thing is that the publishers have put the map of the ancient city in such a two-page layout that the mausoleum for Alexander's body which forms such a central axis for the city and for this book, is hidden in the folds between the two pages. This is certainly provocative, but also a bit irritation producing. Then comes the author's recounting of Alexander's career. The events are mixed up, in the wrong chronological sequence. He has put the Egyptian experience of Alexander at the beginning of Alexander's invasion (as a prelude, seeking of wisdom from the Oracle at Siwah), before the invasion even starts. One hopes that this is just a slip of the Word Processing program. recommend this book as a definitive treatment of either
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing: Poorly edited and not true to its title,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Alexandria: City of the Western Mind (Hardcover)
I would not get this book if I had to do it again. There was apparenly no editing as the book repeats itself in multiple places (how many times do I need to be told that two streets intersected -- in the space of two pages? This sort of thing occurs half a dozen times). The content itself is underwhelming: One section of the book is a shallow laundry list of the philosophers who graced the city. Then there is a long section on Cleopatra (read Michael Grant on this topic instead), then a better discussion of Alexandia's role as a theological hotbed prior to the Arab conquest. It really fails to do justice to the rich history or Alexandria as the capital of the Ptolemys and its role as an entrepot for thoughts and commerce. Look elsewhere for a good book on this city.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mostly disappointing - hopes dashed,
By
This review is from: Alexandria: City of the Western Mind (Hardcover)
Like another reviewer, I bought this on impulse, since its publication coincided almost exactly with my burgeoning interest in the Hellenic period. Also like the same other reviewer, I found it disappointing, although not for the same reasons.
First, and unlike most reviewers, I found the writing clumsy and amateurish. There were many passages that literally made me wince with embarrassment. It speaks volumes about the state of "Higher Ed" that Vrettos is (or was) Director of something called "The Writers' Conference" at Simmons College. Associated with that was the poor editing noted by other reviewers. For content, it felt as though the book was rushed into print, a glaring contrast to the care that was lavished on the cover, paper, typesetting, etc. I started complaining to my wife almost immediately, who rolled her eyes and told me to "just take it back to the bookstore" (but I didn't - more in minute). And speaking of content, the priorities were unbelievably skewed: Do we really need yet another day-by-day account of the Cleopatra-Antony affair? (which constitutes almost a third of the book). I would have preferred a more thorough treatment of Alexandria's leading cultural and intellectual lights, who, for the most part, got nothing but little capsule biographies. Especially, I would have welcomed a more in-depth look at the Ptolemies. More positively, there is much useful information - even if Vrettos did get his sequences wrong in several places - which is why I decided to keep it. Also, and in spite of my previous reservations, Mark Antony was nicely fleshed out. I can't vouch for Vrettos' accuracy, but Antony came off as a sympathetic, flawed character; a real first century party animal, also probably a real hunk, but a crumbling cookie when the going got tough. Poor Cleopatra - one of the savviest statespersons in history, but she made a fatal error in her choice of partners. Also unlike a few other reviewers, I found Vrettos' tenacious use of primary sources admirable. There's entirely too much "analysis"(ie: filching) in the scholarly communities, to the point where the general reader doesn't know whom to trust. I'm undoubtedly prejudiced in this, having had (the late, great, John)Greenway's Law pounded into me as an undergrad: If you must, trust only primary sources (Greenway trusted nothing). Recommendations: If you're interested in Alexandria, and aren't yet familiar with the Cleopatra & Antony saga, get it from your local Library. If you're already somewhat up on your Alexandrian history and just want a handy reference book, look for a good used copy (say, from Amazon), and skip the middle third.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|