First off, let me preface by saying I'm exactly the same age as Damien Echols and I remember being 18 and watching his trial on TV. I was a "goth chick" in Canada at the time and I had incredibly ambivalent feelings about it. On the one hand, I figured the cops must know what they're doing and, therefore, have the correct suspects. But on the other hand, he (and the other 2) just didn't seem like Satanic killers - and this scared me. I was used to be persecuted all the time in my own little world, so when the documentaries Paradise Lost 1 & 2 came out, I jumped on the "Free the WM3" Bandwagon hard! After reading Devil's Knot, I was completely addicted to this case.
Having said that, this book was not as satisfying to me as the Paradise Lost docs and Devil's Knot. There are a number of reasons why this book bugged me.
1) It was too short and not detailed enough, particularly about his childhood. Now, I know it's difficult to remember every insignificant detail that happens, but I would have liked some more depth to the description of his relationships - especially with his mother. I just felt like he focused a great deal on his poverty and how much he hated Jack, and there was little else substance.
2) The prose was extremely imitative. I got a good chuck of a way through the book with this nagging feeling that I have read this "voice" before and it was not until I got about until the point where he moved into the tin roof hut that I realized this was the style that Stephen King used in his memoir "On Writing." I know Damien Echols is a big fan of Stephen King and all, but I just couldn't help feel that right before writing this memoir he read "On Writing" and tried his best to emulate it. It came across as contrived and empty.
3) His vicious contempt for overweight people. I am not overweight myself, so his comments didn't offend me PERSONALLY. But it didn't take a Doctor of psychology to see that he is harboring some deep narcissistic issues, specifically against fat people. There must have been dozen metaphors about overweight people and implying that their obesity indicates a major personality flaw. It became really awkward to read all his shallow insecurities like that and I began feeling really embarrassed for him as a writer. The other metaphor that got old the first time he used it was to describe the "gay porn 70's moustaches" that all Arkansas cops seemed to have at the time. He just came across as incredibly arogant and self-important. A little humility would have been much more endearing.
4) The way he described his wife. I don't want to go into too many details to "spoil" things for those who have not read it. And I understand he has been locked up in prison without much contact with women for a long time. But there were a couple things that he said about his wife that came across as shallow and immature... and, well, horny. And I understand that a great deal of his development is stuck at age 18. You can only mature so much by reading books in isolation, so I don't completely fault him for this last point.
Overall, it was an OK book. It wasn't the best book I've ever read, but I am still a die hard supporter of the WM3. I still believe Damien Echols is innocent, despite the fact that I now realize he is an arrogant narcissist. I relate to him less than I did as a goth girl back in the 90's, but I'm OK with that. I don't think the Pulitzer people will be banging down his prison door to talk to him about this book, but it's still an interesting read for those who are followers of this case.