Top critical review
2 people found this helpful
Pretty Biased, A little inaccurate at parts, Some good points raised.
on December 8, 2015
Finding any point of view, that is not based on the strictest of historical documents(primary source documents), but is instead based on interpretation of alleged facts and it being unbiased is hard. Mr. D'Souza provides a biased counter to Howard Zin. Nither in this situation are completely correct, Zin especially. However there are some huge historical holes in this presentation (look no further than the Mexican-American war, if you don't believe me look at where, then, Gen. Zachery Tyler built his forts) Pleas don't watch this for any kind of historical merit, for that I suggest something a little less "party orientated." Watch this as the opposite counter to Howard Zin's history. He has some fantastic points in here however each one has an obvious spin on it to favor one political party over the other. Overall if he would have less speculation by himself and "experts" and a little more fact based evidence that would be nice.