Shows definite wear, and perhaps considerable marking on inside
| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Good History of the Politics of History Textbooks,
By Roger D. Launius "Historian" (Washington, D.C., United States) - See all my reviews (VINE VOICE) (TOP 1000 REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: America Revised (Paperback)
Frances FitzGerald gained fame as a result of her book, "Fire in the Lake" (1972) when she brilliantly argued that the U.S. stumbled into Vietnam, and continued to stumble and fail for years, because of its inability to understand the history and psychology of the people who lived in the area. This 1979 book, "America Revised," turns her analytical capabilities on the manner in which we have understood our own history. She traces the evolution of the development of history textbooks and the debates over them through the years. The result is a fascinating portrait of the manner in which we define ourselves by what we teach our children about our past.
What FitzGerald finds is that for most people the history taught in secondary, and even universities, was consciously constructed to enhance the citizenship of the populace. The definition of enhanced citizenship might differ in time and space, but fundamentally it has emphasized a traditional vision of the American past in which a consensus interpretation--a one nation, one people emphasis--has been the norm rather than a story that is filled with conflict and counter narratives. The fierceness of the debate over what is contained in history textbooks, and therefore what is taught in school, results from the need to redefine national identity and a concern that the bulwarks of traditional conceptions may be crumbling. This has recast historical inquiry as an intellectual battleground where the casualties are no longer theories about the past that matter mostly to historians but the overall "weltanschauung" of society in a post-modern, multicultural, anti-hierarchical age. Since the 1960s, as FitzGerald makes clear, Americans have been seeking to understand an identity that is more multicultural, less hierarchical, and decidedly partisan. It was a coordinated effort. The author highlights the work of one group of reformers known as "The New Social Studies Movement," which urged the teaching of a more varied form of history in which race, ethnicity, class, and gender emerged as core areas of analysis. This represented, according to FitzGerald, "the most dramatic rewriting of history ever to take place" in America (p. 58). In contrast, throughout most of American history, albeit with some challenge over time, most Americans have viewed their past as exceptionalistic, nationalistic, and triumphant. This consensus interpretation celebrated the long tradition of shared American ideals and values while de-emphasizing conflict, and that made the United States and the people that made it up somehow better. Its advocates questioned the ideas and people who challenged those cherished principles, seeing in many of them strains of authoritarianism, anarchy, and narrow- and simple-mindedness of all varieties. "America Revised" is a powerful exploration of the politics of history textbook writing, publishing, and adoption. It also helps to show how the politics of history affect our children and educational system. Quintessential historian C. Vann Woodward commented on this important book in "The New York Review of Books": "Her major contribution has been to shed light on the reasons why generation after generation of Americans have been deprived...of any real sense of history, or their place or the place of their country in history."
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
best US historiography,
By EL (San Diego, CA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: America Revised (Paperback)
The reviews here don't do this book justice. It's not "conspiracy theories" about "the truth." It is a nuanced book based on Fitzgerald's New Yorker articles in the late 1970s, drawing on her extensive, thoughtful reading of the broad collection of historic textbooks at Columbia Teacher's College. Fitzgerald offers a surprising historiography about the range of textbooks in the 1930s, the cracks in the supposedly-consensus history of the 1950s, and the 1960s and 70s shifts from social movements of the right as well as left, as well as the business pressures of textbook publishing. Smart and incredibly well-written, this book is better than more recently-written books about America's textbook controversies. Anyone interested in the teaching of U.S. history or public memory in America should read this book.
10 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Thought Provoking...Interesting,
By A Customer
This review is from: America Revised: History Schoolbooks in the Twentieth Century (Hardcover)
This book raises questions of conspiracy with its story of how history is altered according to the times and whims (?) of the few. I recommend this book for anyone studying history, and anyone who wants to know "the truth."
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|