Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The struggle for cultural identity, June 30, 2005
This review is from: American Gothic: A Life of America's Most Famous Painting (Hardcover)
"American Gothic: A Life of America's Most Famous Painting" by Steven Biel is a brilliant interdisciplinary study of Grant Wood's "American Gothic" and its ever-changing meanings over the past 75 years. This engaging book intelligently discusses the painting's substantive role in 20th Century America's struggle for cultural identity. The author's cogent, well-researched and accessible writing has produced a book that should interest a wide audience, including historians, artists, pop culture afficianados and general readers.
Mr. Biel profiles the artist's problematic personal life and his transformation from expatriate bohemian to earnest painter of American regionalism to illuminate some of the ambiguities that have been transposed into "American Gothic". For example, might the cathedral-like architecture and the model's buttoned-up attire represent the artist's own religious guilt and repressed sexuality or is it merely a recording of small-town Puritanical morality? Do the age differences between the male and female figures suggest a father/daughter or husband/wife relationship, with the varying meanings entailed by such a reading, and what does it say about the artist's adult relationship with his mother? According to Mr. Biel, these are a few of the painting's enigmatic qualities that serve to fascinate new generations of viewers.
Painted in 1930, we learn that "American Gothic" was initially greeted with praise from the artistic vanguard who appreciated its Menckenesque critique of the culturally backward Midwest. However, as the Depression wore on, Mr. Biel writes that the steely determination of the subjects appealed to a mass audience that was in search of stability and reassurance in a time of crisis. As a result, the image was pressed into service by the corporate mass media as a propagandistic representation of American values. Not surprisingly, the painting fell out of favor with the Left. The work was savagely critiqued for its idealized depiction of Jeffersonian agrarianism, including its omission of any hint of massive popular discontent with capitalism and its subtle suggestion of isolationism and fanatacism.
Mr. Biel draws on his knowledge of film, literature, theater, and popculture history to tell us that postwar society tended to parody "American Gothic" as a means to compare and contrast changing lifestyles and attitudes with the idea of a mythic, uncorrupted America. In the early 1960s, the painting was successfully used to sell cereal to consumers; in the late 1960s and 1970s, numerous parodies poked fun at changing sexual mores, the war on drugs and other topics. Exploitation of the image has continued to the present, including a noteworthy collage that makes a strong and biting comment on the war on terror. The author contends that the ubiquitousness of the parodies has served to solidify the painting's iconolatry as the normalized definition of the nation's so-called "heartland", which is commonly understood to mean white, middle-class rural America.
The book includes a middle section with full-color reproductions of the original painting and a selection of some of the more interesting parodies. Numerous black and white illustrations are also interspersed throughout the text. These pictures help readers follow Mr. Biel's narrative and analysis with ease.
I highly recommend this entertaining and thoughtful book to everyone.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Exhaustively researched, and yet seriously lacking, December 27, 2005
This review is from: American Gothic: A Life of America's Most Famous Painting (Hardcover)
American Gothic the book is as enigmatic as the painting it purports to chronicle. The author while quite well versed in literature and history, shows a definite lack of chops when it comes to Art History.
At times the book reads like a drunken pointless ramble by a highly educated man. You hang on and try to make order out of the meanderings, but in the end there is no point. Which is a shame considering the deluge of cultural minutiae thrown at you.
Minutiae that often has no real connection to the painting in even a tangential fashion.
This book is a discussion of how a painting can be used as a cultural weapon, and how that weapon can and does change hands over time. It's all a matter of perspective and the way a static object that is somewhat enigmatic can reside on one side of the fence today, and the other side tomorrow. After 172 pages Mr. Biel seems incapable of nailing down the crux of the situation.
It's pointed out repeatedly that Grant Wood's American Gothic couple has countenances that defy interpretation, yet there is not one word of mention in relating it to the Mona Lisa, and the age old question of what she is thinking. The dust jacket photo shows American Gothic hanging next to the Mona Lisa, so obviously SOMEBODY thought of this connection. Maybe the Dust Jacket Art Director should have proof read the book....
Mr. Biel talks about how the use of the word 'heartland' was used by both sides in the last presidential election.... not that this has spit to do with Grant Wood's painting.
And yet he's managed to fill 172 pages in discussing ONE painting without even so much as noticing that the woman's apron/dress is billboard flat. Mind you this is a rural/farm setting.... such blatant lack of fecundity/sexuality doesn't strike you as a tad weird Mr. Biel???
How about the snake like wisp of hair pointed up at her right ear?? Or the way she's not so happy, and has her gaze fixed on something off to the right of the picture frame, and out of our field of vision. Looks more like the 'thousand yard stare' than anything else. And how her dress/apron pattern echoes the drapery pattern in the 'Gothic' window... and what does that say???
If you ask me, this old maid is worldly weary of dear old Dad scaring off all the suitors with his hay fork and psycho gaze. She's either gonna bust loose, and be free somewhere else, or she's going to stay under Dad's oppressive thumb and be an old maid for the rest of her life. Judging by her weak chin, she's probably not quite up to the task... which has probably lead to her predicament in the first place.
Are we going to talk about this sort of stuff?? Noooooooooo... we're going to talk about campaign slogans in 2004.... sigh. Please, spare me.....
Mr. Biel also discusses at length how American Gothic has been parodied over the years... and yet not once does he broach the subject of how other paintings such as the Mona Lisa, or Rockwell's Freedom From Want paintings are also parodied in similar fashion.
American Gothic the book is painfully well researched, and yet oh so lacking. In my opinion this is one book that really needed a co-writer.
It's worth reading, just don't read it thinking you're getting the whole picture.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Most Famous American Painting's Biography, September 14, 2005
This review is from: American Gothic: A Life of America's Most Famous Painting (Hardcover)
It is the most familiar of American paintings, and needs just a few words to bring the image to mind: a sturdy farming couple, standing in front of their house, with the man holding a pitchfork. If you have never seen Grant Wood's famous "American Gothic" in its original oil on beaverboard incarnation at the Art Institute of Chicago, you have seen it in reproduction, and even more often in parody. It has inspired praise as art or as satire or as realism or as social commentary, and condemnation for all that, too. Grant Wood himself was rather tight-lipped about it, but in _American Gothic: A Life of America's Most Famous Painting_ (Norton) Steven Biel has looked at the painting in many different ways. He has not shown what the painting means; no one could do that. He has shown what different generations and schools of thought have made of it, and it is clear that the painting has inspired plenty of careful thought as well as raucous takeoffs. Not bad for a couple of dull old farmers in a frame.
Biel first examines the originals the artist used in composing his painting. The house, with its clapboard siding and gothic window, actually exists. It is on Route 16 in Eldon, Iowa, and Wood conceived of the painting when he drove by the house in 1930. Wood used models for his two subjects, neither of whom posed in front of the house, and neither of whom posed together, and neither of whom was a farmer. The woman was Wood's sister Nan, whose face was too rounded so he lengthened it. The man was Byron McKeeby, an Eldon dentist. Wood knew the type of faces he wanted, and he knew the clothes, too, ordering a "prim, colonial print" apron and overalls from a mail order house in Chicago. Wood himself never specified that he had composed the picture as a satire, and made conflicting remarks about his intent, but the years of the Depression seemed to reinforce the image of the couple in the painting four-square hard-workers. It has been endlessly parodied. Mickey and Minnie Mouse have struck the pose, as have Barbie and Ken and the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers. When Johnny Carson on "The Tonight Show" held up an image of the couple in swimwear, Wood's sister was not amused, sued, and won a small settlement; larger suits against such outlets as _Hustler_ have been unsuccessful. Biel reviews some of the laws involved in copyright and parody, and reveals that the copyright of the painting itself is a matter of legal murkiness.
Biel's book is great fun, not only as it increases understanding of the painting, but as explanation of parts of American social history in the twentieth century. The painting is an enigmatic work that either symbolizes or satirizes American rural wholesomeness, and despite the certainty of qualified authorities here quoted on either side of the question, the real meaning of the painting will always be up for debate. Biel says we can't be certain what Wood intended, but even if we could, "The painting's meanings have much more to do with viewers' perceptions than with his intentions." Those who read this entertaining and often funny book will have their perceptions clarified.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|