Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Poorly Researched, April 2, 2003
This review is from: American Militias: Rebellion, Racism & Religion (Paperback)
First, let me state that I am not a racist nor a member of any militia or neo-nazi group. I never have been and never will be. I read this book by Abanes and Innis soon after it came out. It was during the time in the early 90's when the issue of militias was a hot topic and I was doing research for a novel about militias. I had read a lot of primary sources during my research and was shocked at the lack of primary sources sited in American Militias: Rebellion, Racism & Religion. The vast majority of quotes and sited sources were secondary, and at great conflict with what I found in my research. Most of these authors' sources were organizations that can only be described far left in political orientation. Sources found on either extreme of the political yard stick should never be used as sources when primary sources are available. They lack objectivity and tend to discredit one's work. I don't know if the authors' dependence upon biased sources was an indication of their own political bias, the result of laziness, or an attempt to rush a hot topic book to a publisher. Whatever the reason, I found the book to be highly biased, lacking in objectivity (read having an agenda), and poorly researched. I'm not saying there is no value in the book. But, I would say read it if you want to study how not to properly research a topic but still "look" credible.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Objective, supported introduction to American militias, September 28, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: American Militias: Rebellion, Racism & Religion (Paperback)
This book can best be judged (prior to reading it) by theinarticulate and wrong-headed criticism it takes here in Amazon.com bythose with an obvious pro-militia bias. Where Abanes reaches rational conclusions and then supports them with numerous cites, quotes, etc (roughly 60 pages of notes citing sources and quotes), his critics call him "lazy" or claim that he is a "liar." Of course these opponents fail to do more than snipe. Abanes has laid out his path for all to examine how he has reached his conclussions, which is far more than what his critics have provided. When his detractors attempt to articulate a criticism, they get their facts wrong. Abanes' work is thorough, well-reasoned and supported. I found his coverage of "religion," such as Christian Identity, and it's role in some militia groups fascinating. His chronology of Jewish persecution and the role that some militia goups have played in this history was valuable as well. There is much good to say about this book, not least of which is my opinion that it will increase one's interest in the subject and inspire even more study. Unlike some of Abanes' critics, I believe that inquiry is a good thing. Do read this book, regardless of your beliefs concerning militias.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Propaganda attempting to discredit the militia movement, November 17, 1997
By A Customer
This review is from: American Militias: Rebellion, Racism & Religion (Paperback)
This book can be used as a sourcebook for material on both the militia movement and various racist groups, but like many other such books, it has an agenda of trying to lump the two distinct and opposed movements in order to discredit the militia movement. An example of the way the author pursues this agenda can be found on page 181, in a section on the racist Louis Beam. He references an article written by Beam calling for "leaderless resistance", then quotes the Militia Day Proclamation of 1994, without citing its author, which also discusses leaderless resistance, and says it "makes a clear reference to Beam's organizational structure". Well, I am the author of the Militia Day Proclamation, and at the time I had never heard of Beam, read any of his writings, or read any other racist literature of this kind. My discussion of the idea was based on a knowledge of the history of various resistance movements, especially the French Resistance to German occupation during World War II and various resistance efforts in the Soviet Union. Presumably Beam got the idea from a study of the same historical efforts. Abanes could hardly be unaware of this historical background. It has been mentioned in numerous histories, novels, and movies. He is trying to make his readers believe that this shows the militia movement grew out of racism. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|