Start reading Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy on the free Kindle Reading App or on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Enter a promotion code
or gift card
 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available
 

Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy (Mind Association Occasional) [Kindle Edition]

Tom Sorell , G. A. J. Rogers
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Digital List Price: $94.99 What's this?
Print List Price: $105.00
Kindle Price: $75.99
You Save: $29.01 (28%)

Free Kindle Reading App Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $75.99  
Hardcover $89.25  
Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Book Description

Philosophy written in English is overwhelmingly analytic philosophy, and the techniques and predilections of analytic philosophy are not only unhistorical but anti-historical, and hostile to textual commentary. Analytic usually aspires to a very high degree of clarity and precision of formulation and argument, and it often seeks to be informed by, and consistent with, current natural science. In an earlier era, analytic philosophy aimed at agreement with ordinary linguistic intuitions or common sense beliefs, or both. All of these aspects of the subject sit uneasily with the use of historical texts for philosophical illumination. In this book, ten distinguished philosophers explore the tensions between, and the possibilities of reconciling, analytic philosophy and history of philosophy.

Contributors: M. R. Ayers, John Cottingham, Daniel Garber, Gary Hatfield, Anthony Kenny, Steven Nadler, G. A. J. Rogers, Tom Sorell, Catherine Wilson, Yves Charles Zarka


Editorial Reviews

Review

timely, balanced and of the highest quality. P. J. E. Kail, Mind Journal a fine collection of essays written by fine historians, who...show how fascinating the history of philosophy can be Paul Schuurman, British Journal for the History of Philosophy

About the Author

Tom Sorell is at Department of Philosophy, University of Essex. G. A. J. Rogers is at Department of Philosophy, Keele University.

Product Details

  • File Size: 2922 KB
  • Print Length: 240 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (June 2, 2005)
  • Sold by: Amazon Digital Services, Inc.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B006UBXKRI
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Not Enabled
  • Lending: Enabled
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,181,707 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?


Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
(1)
5.0 out of 5 stars
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
In his introduction, Tom Sorell notes that analytic philosophy is not only unhistorical but anti-historical. Contributors describe some of the problems this has caused for the history of philosophy and the reasons it has been generally reduced to little more than a repository of assorted philosophical arguments and errors. Given that the role of history is to cast the light of the past on the present, it invites the question of why the history of philosophy has allowed itself to be so reduced that it can neither contextualize the analytic tradition in the history of philosophy, nor compare and contrast it with other alternative traditions in philosophy. Are philosophical analysts intellectual bullies who will brook no contextualization of both their strengths and weaknesses in the history of philosophy? Is this why analytic philosophy is anti-historical? If so, what can historians of philosophy do to show that philosophy cannot be reduced to the analytic tradition in philosophy?
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Search Customer Reviews
Search these reviews only

Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Look for Similar Items by Category