Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Anarchism: A history of libertarian ideas and movements Paperback – January 1, 1962


See all 6 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, January 1, 1962
$8.90
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"
$9.95
--This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Paperback: 504 pages
  • Publisher: New American Libray (1962)
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B0006AXTWU
  • Product Dimensions: 7.7 x 5 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #700,031 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

His book remains the essential introduction to the classical anarchist thinkers. -- Mark Leier, Director, Centre for Labour Studies, Simon Fraser University --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Review

Woodcock's thoughtful appraisals, careful research, and graceful writing skillfully demonstrate the importance of anarchism as a historical movement. At the same time, his compassion and generosity of spirit make plain the relevance of anarchism to our own age of capital, empire, and the surveillance state. His book remains the essential introduction to the classical anarchist thinkers.

(Mark Leier, Director, Centre for Labour Studies, Simon Fraser University) --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful By TheIrrationalMan on March 10, 2000
Format: Paperback
Though it has now been supplanted, or to put it more mildly, updated, by Peter Marshall's more recent "Demanding the Impossible", Woodcock's history remains nonetheless an incisive and extremely readable survey. A superb introduction to anarchist thought.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful By Steven A. Peterson TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on June 8, 2008
Format: Paperback
Every so often when I was a full-time teacher, I taught a course in libertarian political theory. This volume was a standard textbook that I used (there is now a much more recent version, if I read Amazon correctly). Woodcock defines the subject of this work along the following lines (Page 13): ". . .a system of social thought, aiming at fundamental changes in the structure of society and particularly. . .at the replacement of the authoritarian state by some sort of nongovernmental co-operation between free individuals." Once thus stated, of course, many readers would instantly dismiss the project described. However, this is a very nice overview of libertarian/anarchist thinkers and, as such, serves a useful purpose.

The organizational structure is pretty clean. His prologue outlines Woodcock's view of the subject matter. Then, Part I, "The Idea." Here, the author examines the political thought of a number of key thinkers in this strand of political thought. He begins with the deeper historical predecessors, including the "Diggers" in English history, Thomas Paine, and Jacques Roux, inter alia. Among those whose work he summarizes and assesses in more detail: William Godwin, the man of reason; Max Stirner, the egoist; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, the intellectual father of syndicalism; Mikhail Bakunin, the Russian nobleman who became an anarchist; Peter Kropotkin, a prince in Russia, who used evolutionary theory to justify his anarchist perspective; Leo Tolstoy (yet another Russian) and his Christian anarchism.

After perusing individual thinkers, Woodcock then examines anarchism/libertarianism across a variety of societies--from France to Italy to Spain to Russia, and elsewhere (including the United States).
Read more ›
11 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By Steven H. Propp TOP 100 REVIEWER on February 21, 2012
Format: Paperback
George Woodcock (1912-1995) was a Canadian anarchist thinker, essayist and literary critic. This 1962 book was the first post-War history of anarchism. He wrote in the Prologue, "Few doctrines or movements have been so confusedly understood in the public mind, and few have presented in their own variety of approach so much excuse for confusion. That is why, before beginning to trace the actual historical course of anarchism, as a theory and a movement, I start with a chapter of definition. What is anarchism? And what is it not?"

He says that all anarchists would accept the proposition that "man naturally contains within him all the attributes which make him capable of living in freedom and social concord... clearly those who attempt to impose man-made laws.. are the real enemies of society, and the anarchist who rebels against them, even to the extent of violence and destruction, is not antisocial after all." (Pg. 22-23)

He observes that "After (Peter) Kropotkin, (William) Godwin became recognized by the more intellectual anarchists as one of their predecessors, but his influence, which was potent, has mostly lain elsewhere." (Pg. 60) Godwin was, however, one of the first to describe clearly the link between property and power "which has made anarchists enemies of capitalism as well as of the state." (Pg. 75) Michael Bakunin, on the other hand, "failed, to begin, where most of the great anarchists have succeeded---as a writer." (Pg. 146) Bakunin is the anarchist who is associated with violence, when in books such as his 'Principles of Revolution' he stated that the methods to be utilized were "extremely varied---poison, the knife, the rope, etc." (Pg.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By eddie.calendula on March 19, 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Woodcock's Anarchism was first published in 1962 but contains some updates from two decades later. Its historical gaze is fairly in depth for the most part, and it is helpful to approach this text with some basic prior knowledge of anarchism. Overall it is a great resource in understanding anarchism as a historical movement, bringing attention to events and people that are largely overlooked elsewhere. The only downside of Woodcock's detailed research is that the reader may tire of specific names of journals and dates and other overly-particular information from time to time.

The book begins with an effective introduction that anticipates the broader trends in anarchist history and its key players. The next part of the book focuses on the lives of individuals who contributed important or distinct threads to the anarchist narratives, and the last section chronologies libertarian movements by nation or region.

I think this is a terrific treasure of anarchist history, however it should not escape a couple of critiques. As somebody more familiar with anarchist activities of the last couple decades, I found the absence of women and women's issues to be a blatant gap. No doubt the movement itself was historically hostile to women at times and historical artifacts equating first wave feminism with classical anarchism are exceptional. The book of course does include women--Louise Michel and Emma Goldman being its principle celebrities for the time period covered--but it offers little explanation for or admission of their underrepresentation.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?