Customer Reviews

The Anatomy of Criticism: A Trialogue

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Henry Hazlitt was not yet a Misesian at this point in his life (1933). In writing Anatomy of Criticism, he seems to have no axe to grind and no academic ideology to defend. He has read to a very great extent, with passion and decorum. If not abstractly, he has ruminated superior and more compellingly than those whose yearn for composing unduly often furnishes too many books about literature, either tedious or cursory, or both. The issues of the dialogues range from "criticism's right to exist" and "the critic's function" to such cordially parlayed topics as "objectivity or subjectivity," "tradition and rebellion," "standards," and "sincerity, style, and pure art." Insofar as he at the time had one, Hazlitt appears to advance towards the elucidation of his own conjecture in the chapter on "The Social Mind." The notions have as a root Charles Cooley's Social Organization; the implementation to literature is Hazlitt's, though essentially, he may have been close to the point of view at the time of rhetorician I.A. Richards. Values are the crucial thing both for literature and for life: "Values are determined by the social mind. The value of a good is not inherent in that good; it is not independent of the mind and desires of men. But it is in large degree independent of the mind and desires of any particular man" (pp. 103-104). The chapter designated Vivisecting Signor Croce is a very clever excoriating of the Italian promulgator of analytical uncertainty.

Hazlitt has penned an invaluable and controversial book. Lavish in quotation, it is nearly an compendium of critical theory. Much gratitude is owed to the Mises Institute for bringing it back to print. The keen student of English and criticism will purchase it, read it, and then read it again. Such rereading won't founder in expanding and vitalizing one's convictions of literature.