From School Library Journal
Grade 6 Up?Day offers a history of animal experimentation, and why it was done, along with examples. She follows this with a chapter stating the case against such experimentation, and another propounding scientific reasons for it. She includes a discussion on human experimentation, including the notorious Tuskegee experiment on syphilitics, which was conducted by the federal government with a cold disregard for the people involved. Explaining some of the new technologies currently under development, the author offers some possible alternatives, the least techological of all being simply stopping. She avoids using the more lurid pictures of animals under experimentation, but does indicate that some procedures cause more fear and pain than experimenters may like to admit. Calmly, almost stolidly, Day attempts to present both sides in a dispassionate text, leaving it up to readers to make their own determination using their own standards. Many of the more recent books on animal rights treat experimentation as just one phase of the unthinking abuse of animals by humans, such as Charles Patterson's Animal Rights (Enslow, 1993) and Laurence Pringle's The Animal Rights Controversy (Harcourt, 1989). This book has a tighter focus. Food for uncomfortable thought.?Patricia Manning, Eastchester Public Library, NY
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Gr. 7-12. Are laboratory experiments on animals a cruel and unnecessary procedure, or a vital part of medical research? This Issues in Focus title tackles a thorny question. Day describes the typical uses for experiments: basic research about biological systems; training for surgeons; and testing for new drugs and other products. "Virtually every advance in medical science in the 20th century . . . has been achieved . . . through the use of animals in laboratory experiments," an AMA White Paper notes. Animal-rights and animal-welfare activists disagree, holding that animal suffering is unconscionable and that many of the experiments can be replaced by other tests. Day offers a wealth of information both pro and con experimentation. Chapters on the history of experimentation, human medical experiments, and some possible alternatives to animal testing--including cell culture research and computer programs that simulate biological processes--round out the book nicely. Black-and-white photos accompany the generally smooth, although sometimes repetitive, text. Students interested in the subject and those needing information for reports will find the book useful. Glossary; notes; bibliography.
Anne O'Malley