Most Helpful Customer Reviews
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Thoughtful discussion of a dicey concept, December 4, 2006
This review is from: Animism: Respecting the Living World (Paperback)
"Animism" has a rather shady history, having been often used as a pejorative label for beliefs regarded as simple or primitive. Properly, it refers to those religions based on attributing spirits, or spiritual nature, to some or all beings in the environment: animals, trees, rocks, mountains, and so on. Most traditional religions of small-scale societies do this. However, these religions differ enormously among themselves. Harvey, a religious studies professor, compares the Ojibwe (Anishinabe) with the Central Desert Australian Aborigines, giving brief (all too brief) accounts of both. These religions are as different from each other as either one is from Christianity or Islam, making "animism" a problematic category. Harvey also uses the term "shamanism" very broadly--much more broadly than I would care for; I prefer to limit the term to its original meaning, i.e. the religion of the indigenous peoples of Siberia ("shaman" is a Tungus word, from east Siberia) and such religions as are clearly very closely related thereto. Talking about "shamans" among South American Indians or San is really stretching the term. However, a case can still be made for using the term in its classic broad sense, to refer to any religion in which the officiants send their souls to the lands of the gods and dead, and this is how Harvey uses it. Still, I wonder what is served by generalizing about very disparate traditions.
Harvey gives a very good short history and discussion of the concept of animism, with full attention to its pejorative uses in the past. He makes a very good case for rehabilitating it (as have Eugene Hunn and several other anthropologists). He also discusses its use by modern individuals seeking to reconnect with a more immanent, environmental spirituality. [...]I hope that Harvey's all too brief, but really intelligent and thought-provoking, discussion makes such seekers go more deeply into the wonderful variety and incredible depth and power of the thousands of worldviews and religions lumped (for better or worse) as "animist."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting rehabilitation of an old concept, October 25, 2006
This review is from: Animism: Respecting the Living World (Paperback)
I am a professional anthropologist, with a specialization in anthropology of religion and the author of a forthcoming text on anthropology of religion from Routledge. Like the previous review, I was skeptical when I saw that Harvey included discussions of wiccans, feminists, and eco-spiritualists. However, the concern was ill-founded. Harvey has actually given us a very intelligent book on the latest research into "animism" or more properly the agent-centered view of nature and supernature. Truly, early commentators like Tylor considered animism to be an inferior type of religion, one based on false notions of intelligence or will in non-human beings (of course one could criticize all religions for false notions about non-human intelligence). However, as Harvey shows, not only is animism not inferior at all, but it is actually the essence of ALL religion--that there are non-human agents in the world, and that we humans interact socially with them. The contemporary sources that Harvey cites are a valuable library on their own.
There are some shortcomings of the book. It does not include some of the best new work on agency in religion, like Pascal Boyer, Scott Atran, and Paul Bloom. The discussion of Hallowell and the Ojibwe is valuable, but the chapter on Australian Aboriginals is very deficient, relying on two main sources, one worthwhile (Deborah Bird Rose) and one not worthwhile (Michael Jackson). There is much literature he could and should have referenced, as I know, having done my fieldwork among the Warlpiri of Central Australia. Even the discussion of eco-spiritualism and such shows that these religions are as authentic as any "traditional" belief system, and in fact all belief systems are of course invented and constructed, and all are as affected by modernity as these new ones.
Harvey's conclusion, that animism has been a concept invented by moderns to achieve modern intellectual goals is a good one, and he rightly points out that not all cultures share our Western dualistic approach to mind and body or to humans and "nature." It is a book very worth reading.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Thank you Graham Harvey for such a well-crafted book!, January 12, 2008
This review is from: Animism: Respecting the Living World (Paperback)
I am impressed with this book for at least a few reasons. One, it goes to the heart of indigenous/shamanic/animist/pagan/earthy worldviews by placing the emphasis on relationships and learning how to relate well with diverse other kinds of beings. Two, it does so with language that is honoring of diversity and non-divisive, no small task considering the history of English-speaking cultures. And three, Harvey is playful. He's fun to read and gets that most animists are not uptight curmudgeons.
I teach shamanism to spiritual seekers as part of my day-job and see how this IS something that is learned (or not), just as Harvey asserts, by indigenous and non-indigenous folks alike. I also work as a professional counselor and see how most folks at least in this area of the US only see other living humans as full persons and that the major task before Western cultures (in my opinion) is to restore personhood to our other-than-human relations and to allow our ethical frameworks and conduct to follow suit from this shift in attention and worldview. You can call this a reclamation of Indigenous Mind, an animist revival, or survival. In any case, it's time.
Big thanks to Harvey for such a well-crafted text!
Daniel Foor /[...]
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|