Sell Back Your Copy
For a $0.78 Gift Card
Trade in
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Aristotle Adventure: A Guide to the Greek, Arabic, & Latin Scholars Who Transmitted Aristotle's Logic to the Renaissance
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Aristotle Adventure: A Guide to the Greek, Arabic, & Latin Scholars Who Transmitted Aristotle's Logic to the Renaissance [Paperback]

Burgess Laughlin (Author)
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback --  

Book Description

0964471493 978-0964471498 July 1995
Logic is an indispensable tool of a philosophy of reason. That tool and that philosophy came from Aristotle around 330 BC. How did they reach us through all that time?

The Aristotle Adventure answers that question by providing a guide to the individuals who published, studied, explained, taught, and extended Aristotle's greatest achievement--logic, a tool for understanding this world. This reader-friendly account covers 2,000 years, 10,000 miles, and four cultures (Greek-Pagan, Greek-Christian, Arabic-Islamic, and Latin-Christian).

The Aristotle Adventure is for:
*General readers seeking a clearly written intellectual adventure.
*Students of the history of ideas, philosophy, Western Civilization, or theology.
*Scholars who want an overview of this wide-ranging story.

The author explains each new philosophical concept as it appears in the story. (A combined index-glossary allows readers to easily review key concepts and individuals.) Secondary information, set into tables and charts, allows readers to focus on the main story in the main text, with little distraction. Extensive end-notes and bibliography open avenues to further reading.



Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

This is the only book we're aware of that traces Aristotle's works on logic through a variety of cultures to the time of the Renaissance.

The books other claim to fame is its user-friendliness. We were surprised by how clearly Mr. Laughlin communicated often difficult historical and philosophical concepts. His use of summary sidebars is especially helpful.

The Aristotle Adventure is beginning to be used in college-level Western Civilization courses.

From the Author

What The Aristotle Adventure Is:
First and foremost, The Aristotle Adventure is a guidebook -- that is, it is a guide to the individuals who brought Aristotle's greatest achievement, his logic, from his time to the Renaissance and, thus, the modern world. Ideas pass over land and through time in one of two forms -- either recorded, especially in books, or retained in the minds of the people who understand those ideas. For this story, modern scholars don't know much about the individual manuscripts, at least up to around AD1200. But modern scholars do know something about some of the individuals who carried along Aristotle's work on logic -- and his philosophy of reason -- from one generation to the next, from one place to another, and from one culture to another. Most of those individuals were courageous; a few were not. Most were good men and women; a few were not. But each one -- copyist, teacher, or philosopher -- played a role. Intentionally or not, each one passed the baton of Aristotle's logic to the next runner in this 2,000 year saga. In that long succession, the most famous were Galen, Boethius, Ibn Rushd, and Aquinas. There were many others. What The Aristotle Adventure does, in less than 200 pages of main text, is briefly profile over 90 of those individuals, major and minor. The book, however, isn't simply a string of profiles. There is a story line -- the dramatic conflict of reason and unreason -- and there is a colorful backdrop for that drama: the rise and fall of nations, states and cultures.

How It Is Organized:

Part 1 is about Aristotle and his logic. It shows the fundamental value of his six treatises on logic, and explains that logic is the tool not only of philosophers, but of all of us. Because the book is aimed at students primarily, I start with a brief explanation of what philosophy is and why it's important.

After Part 1, which is less than 20 pages, the remainder of the book is historical. Part 2 covers that philosophically disheartening 300 year period -- basically the Hellenistic Age -- after Aristotle died. Continuing chronologically, in Part 3, I take the reader through the Greek-Pagan mainstream, roughly from Augustus Caesar's time to the fall of Alexandria. It was this period -- when Neo-Platonist teachers preserved Aristotle's logic in their curriculum -- that shaped the study of Aristotle for a thousand years.

Parts 4, 5 and 6 consider each of the three branch streams that flowed from the Greek-Pagan mainstream: Greek-Christian, Arabic-Islamic, and Latin-Christian. The last pages of the book include endnotes and bibliography. They also include a combined mini-lexicon and index designed to help readers review key concepts. At the end of the book, simple charts summarize the course of each branch.

Within each of the three branches, I followed the action chronologically, one scholar after another, though sometimes the scenery changes radically. For example, in the Arabic-Islamic branch, as the philosophical study of Aristotle's logic fell in Baghdad, it rose in Cordoba and other cities of Islamic Spain.

I presented the Latin-Christian branch last, partly because it was the longest -- from Varro c. 50 BC to Galileo c. 1600 AD -- and partly because it was the only branch where anyone succeeded in again applying Aristotle's logic to life on earth, specifically in the form of a scientific method, a study that I am sure Aristotle would have loved to have continued for himself.

Why I Called It An "Adventure":

Well, it's not Raiders of the Lost Ark, but it is an intellectual adventure. The book is partly a saga -- a straightforward account of a sequence of people and events. It is partly a drama -- an account of fundamental values in conflict. It is also an adventure in the sense of a bold, risky enterprise whose outcome was uncertain and hazardous.

I don't mean by 'enterprise' that there was a conscious, deliberate, multi-generational plan to pass Aristotle's logic to the future. But I do believe many individuals in this story valued their own future and their students' future. Proof of valuing something is taking some action to gain that value. What many of these people wanted to gain was respect for logic as the tool of rational people. The cumulative result of each individual's efforts was a sort of philosophical bucket-brigade that passed Aristotle's logic onward until finally someone had the courage, intelligence, rationality -- and freedom of speech -- to apply it to worldly disputes.

Also, if one characteristic of an adventure is facing hazards, then this is certainly an adventure, at least in part. Though not directly because of their role in passing Aristotle's logic to the future, some of the participants were victims of violent illogic. Cicero was assassinated; John Italos was chased by a mob in 11th century Constantinople; Ibn Rushd (Averroes) was banished from Cordova and his writings seized; and, for his insistence on the logical certainty of his conclusions, Galileo was almost silenced by the Church."

Why The Aristotle Adventure Is Suitable For Students:

Actually, it is designed for students -- of one sort or another. I believe this book will work well as a supplementary text in lower-level history of philosophy classes, as well as in classes for Western Civilization, cultural history, intellectual history, and history of science. The Aristotle Adventure covers 2000 years, which might neatly parallel a large part of a Western Civilization course, for example.

Not all students of the history of philosophy are in classes. There are also many serious, intelligent, adult readers in the world outside the campuses. Some of them have enough interest in the subject -- Culturally, how did we get where we are? -- to read a clearly written history. I wrote The Aristotle Adventure to both kinds of students. I took pains to speak clearly, to define my terms (for example, distinguishing reason from rationalism), and to illustrate the story with simple maps, charts, and diagrams.

The challenge of writing a book like this, for students, was to provide just enough explanation of the philosophical concepts to help the reader make sense of the conflicts, and just enough background information to understand the setting.

Some scholars may also find value in this book. There is no place else to go if you want an overview of this wide-ranging story. In fact, I hope that someday soon, someone will write a similar story about Plato's writings -- not only in the Latin-Christian, medieval tradition, but in the Greek-Christian and Arabic-Islamic branches too.

Why I Wrote A Book Like The Aristotle Adventure:

I was doing research for an historical novel set in the Renaissance. The lead character was a printer who was attempting to preserve -- through his printing -- the writings of the scientific geniuses of the ancient Greek past, such as Hippocrates, Aristotle, and Galen. The theme was persistence. In one scene, I wanted to show readers that persistent effort over many generations brought those books to the Renaissance. Aristotle was among the greatest of those scientists, so I looked for a book that would show me how his treatises passed through those 20 centuries. I found bits and pieces of the story in widely scattered sources, but I couldn't find the book I was looking for. So, I wrote it.

My purpose as a writer is to tell success stories. The Aristotle Adventure is a success story. It starts with Aristotle's manuscripts apparently lost not long after his death. It ends with Galileo, the father of modern science. In logic, Galileo was an Aristotelian all his life. As Renaissance scholar William W. Wallace has shown, Galileo began his scientific career with a detailed study of Aristotle's theory of demonstration (scientific proof). Aristotle wrote about that theory in Posterior Analytics, the keystone treatise of his six treatises on logic.


Product Details

  • Paperback: 243 pages
  • Publisher: Albert Hale Pub (July 1995)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0964471493
  • ISBN-13: 978-0964471498
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,130,578 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Burgess Laughlin's central purpose in life is to tell success stories from history. He is not an academic scholar, but primarily a storyteller who writes to inform and inspire advocates of a culture based on reason.

He received a BA in cultural history from Tulane University in 1967. He worked as a writer, editor, and publications manager in the electronics industry, before retiring in 1989.

In 1995, he published _The Aristotle Adventure: A Guide to the Greek, Arabic, and Latin Scholars Who Transmitted Aristotle's Logic to the Renaissance_. It is a clearly written intellectual adventure for general readers intrigued by the history of fundamentally important ideas.

From 1996 to 2000, he studied history and languages at Portland State University (Oregon), as a post-baccalaureate student. He became a member of the Phi Alpha Theta History Honors Society. His classroom studies and six years of subsequent research led to the August 2010 publication of _The Power and the Glory: The Key Ideas and Crusading Lives of Eight Debaters of Reason vs. Faith_.

His weblog, "The Main Event," at http://reasonversusmysticism.blogspot.com , is a journal for his next book, on the crucial conflict of our time -- the war between reason and mysticism.

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
5.0 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

28 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A Fascinating Work on Western Intellectual History, February 13, 2001
By 
This review is from: The Aristotle Adventure: A Guide to the Greek, Arabic, & Latin Scholars Who Transmitted Aristotle's Logic to the Renaissance (Paperback)
Burgess Laughlin's *The Aristotle Adventure* provides an interesting and enlightening account of the transmission of Aristotle's treatises on logic. From ancient Greece, to the Arabian Peninsula and the European Continent, this book details the philosophical transmission of Aristotle's Organon, which laid the foundations for western intellectual and scientific thinking. The writing style is clear and concise, provides impressive detail and is extremely well referenced for further study. This book is a gem for anyone interested in the transmission of the fundamental ideas which gave rise to western civilization.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great illustration of the power of good ideas!, August 13, 2010
This review is from: The Aristotle Adventure: A Guide to the Greek, Arabic, & Latin Scholars Who Transmitted Aristotle's Logic to the Renaissance (Paperback)
Just finished reading this superb book. I thoroughly recommend it to anyone interested in the power and the history of ideas--and the fragility of good ones.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The Desire To Understand Is Intrinsic in Humans, May 9, 2008
This review is from: The Aristotle Adventure: A Guide to the Greek, Arabic, & Latin Scholars Who Transmitted Aristotle's Logic to the Renaissance (Paperback)
I read these works for a graduate seminar on Aristotle.
The desire to understand is intrinsic in human beings, it is in our nature. Philosophy is ultimate consequence of desire. Our desires have many aspects such as, food, sex, etc. Curiosity is natural in humans, we see it especially in small kids, and it comes from within us. Philosophy caps off curiosity and wonder. Aporia = "blocking," something is blocking our wondering as a disturbance and then we struggle to break through with wonder to find the answer. Breaking through aporia can't just be forced but must come from things known. Aristotle always begins his inquiries with the familiar. Difference between Plato and Aristotle, dialogues use aporia but leave unanswered questions, Aristotle says if you try hard you can break thru aporia and get at an answer.

Pursuit of knowledge begins with wonder, breaks thru aporia and satisfies the mind getting to a position of achievement, the goal of knowledge is to eliminate wonder. Faculty of nous is that part of the mind that grasps first principles "First Principles- nous=understanding, demonstration = episteme Dialectic, arche =beginning or rule. Aristotle has a preference for discovering first principles. For Aristotle, one has to start with first principles to proceed to knowledge. These first principles are not just the beginning, but that they govern or rule the procedure for gaining knowledge. Aristotle does not believe humans have these first principles of knowledge innately as Plato believed. Plato thinks knowledge is in the "soul" and innate in humans we just need to find a way to re-learn it.

Potential-Actual Aristotle says we have potential like kids having the capacity to learn language at a young age. For Aristotle, potential for knowledge is innate prior to achieving knowledge.
The "innately" is a swipe at Plato who is similar to Descartes and Liebnitz. Aristotle denies this, nothing is known, it is learned. Even animals have memory. Memory retains perceptions. However, only humans have Logos="reason" and "language." Experience occurs after perception and memory. From our experiences, we get a principle of science. The process of experience arises into the "soul" which then becomes a principle. This all leads to what we know by "induction."

Induction=out of a particular experiences we get a universal. Example, gravity = apple "always" falls. The "always" is the universal principle like Newton's laws. However, sometimes inductions are questionable. Nous=understanding and first principles. "Necessary Knowledge" like 2+2=4. "Contingent knowledge" is of experiences, which might go through variations. Example, how many dogs are in the backyard? Answer, it actually depends on time of day you ask. It means it can change. The goal is to satisfy our desire to know.

The difference of induction for Plato and Aristotle is "this is a horse." "This" is the particular horse is the universal. Plato believed that basic principles and concepts were already in the mind, humans just have to simply access them. Aristotle disagrees he argues that the concept of horse is an organizing principle that humans can use to understand horses when they confront them; he agrees they will be abstract and different from the particular from the horses they actually encounter. What he disagrees with Plato on is how we get the concept. Aristotle says we have to build the concept of "horse" with a classification system; it is not innate in us, as Plato would argue.

Aristotle came up with up with a classification system. Classification=a name for an object. To get a name you look at composition=what makes things the same, division=how things are different (legs, scales). Aristotle says we do this from experience and observation, memory etc. Concept of "horse" is an organizing principle. This is all induction! Therefore, nous doesn't name anything, it is an arbitrary tag. Aristotle wants a universal concept of knowledge that holds this is a difference with Plato. Key concept- Aristotle says language and reality is two sides of the same coin. Logos originally meant speech. Humans access the world through language according to Aristotle. He believes we were built for speech.

A typical deductive syllogism is "If Socrates is human, and all humans are mortal, then Socrates is mortal." Thus if A=B and B=C, then A=C. Deduction begins with a general principle and move to a specific. Induction leads us to general principle then we use deduction to get to answer or deductive claims. Dialectic=finding first principles through testing them out or using dialogue or debate as in Plato. Thus, we contend with differing beliefs to arrive at first principle.

Important idea--Aristotle and distinction between the "many and the wise." This is subject matter of inquiry or dialectic. The "wise" means people with certain understanding. The "many" means we all understand or know such as, "common sense." Aristotle thinks it is important that when we inquirer we start from the many and then move to the wise in our search for answers. We must always consult both. Plato and Socrates never look to the many. Aristotle says whatever the truth is it can't be so unusual as to leave the rest of human beliefs behind. Example is he doesn't buy Zeno's paradox. In addition, the truth can't be so common as to be able to only have to survey the masses. Sometimes, what most people believe needs help. Example, we all think the best sort of life for us is pleasure; we need the wise to guide us and show it is contemplation.

We begin with questions; knowledge seeks to answer these questions. If we want to know what something is, we already have a sense of the difference of what Plato gave. In a nutshell, what Plato said was that the horse that we encounter is an image of an eternal form "horseness." This is a top down concept. Aristotle's answer is that the particular horse we experience is understood by way of organizing and classifying our perceptions and experiences into a whole. This bottom up approach is a classic distinction that finds itself in many different traditions of philosophy. Aristotle does not have Plato's dualistic two worlds. The eternal world of the forms and then the world of material experience. Whatever the universal is, it is found directly in things through experience, not by rising above to the eternal world of the forms.

Unity-every form of knowledge has some kind of unification, this is how we gather our experiences. If we couldn't gather our experiences into some kind of unity that would hold, then every time we would seek to understand something we would have to start over. We would have to continually deal with differences and variations. Therefore, when we know that, that is a horse, that idea, concept of horse has organized our experiences in a way that it gathers it together. Then the term horse names that unity and then rests in the soul and enables us to go out into the world already armed with some gathered sense of things. Therefore, the next time we confront a horse we already know what it is.

There are different levels of unity for Aristotle, such as, Numerical unity things identical to itself, i.e. two apples and two dogs are equally two. Our experiences teach us this. Therefore, "this" horse is a unity and a singular phenomena. Then, there is unity that would occupy the same genus and same species. Classic definition of humans for Aristotle is- "rational animal." Animal =genus, rational=species. Unity by analogy- a difference that brings something together, like "war on drugs." Aristotle preferred things that were unified in a very exact comprehensive way. So, to classify humans as rational animals is decisive because it captures a general feature and a specific feature in such a way that you are always going to know what humans are by way of that classification.

Aristotle recognizes analogies are looser but sometimes performs the function of unifying our experience by bringing things together in some way, however that unification is not going to be exact, decisive full or complete. He prefers demonstration like deduction; it is amore precise form of knowledge and provides so much knowledge. When he talks about logic, which he invented, and he gets into particular investigations like biology he had to confess things are not always exact in nature. Thus, few things are really universal. However, more often in the world we use unity by analogy than unity by numerical, or genus, etc. Remember the "this" is a horse, for Plato, the true object of knowledge was "horseness" not the "this." The "this is a particular limited perceived instance of the super form of horseness. Therefore, what has true being for Plato is the eternal form of horse. The particular horse the "this" does not have absolute true being because it is limited, it is particular, and it comes and goes. Aristotle turns the tables. The true meaning of "being" the question of what does it mean to be something is always a "this." It is not some transcendent form in eternal realm; it is always the particular thing you encounter.

I recommend Aristotle's works to anyone interested in obtaining a classical education, and those interested in philosophy. Aristotle is one of the most important philosophers and the standard that all others must be judged by.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
Imagine that you have grown up in one of those countries described so often in our daily newspapers. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
noncontradictory identification, six treatises, two best students, philosophical scholars, best secondary sources, pagan books, explicit philosophy, posterior analytics, sophistical refutations, teaching logic, other treatises, own treatises
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Ibn Rushd, Roman Empire, Aristotle's Categories, Byzantine Empire, Porphyry's Introduction, Ibn Sina, Thomas Aquinas, Asia Minor, John Italus, Sophistical Rotations, University of Paris, Ammonius of Alexandria, University of Padua, Albertus Magnus, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ibn Maimun, John Philoponus, Peter Abelard, Diogenes Laertius, Ptolemy the Unknown, Tyrannio the Elder, Ishaq ibn Hunain, Andronicus of Rhodes, Ibn Bajjah, North Africa
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:

Citations (learn more)
This book cites 85 books:
See all 85 books this book cites



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:












i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...