Amazon.com: Arming Against Hitler: France and the Limits of Military Planning (9780700607648): Eugenia C. Kiesling: Books

Sell Back Your Copy
For a $0.40 Gift Card
Trade in
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Arming Against Hitler: France and the Limits of Military Planning
  
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Arming Against Hitler: France and the Limits of Military Planning [Hardcover]

Eugenia C. Kiesling (Author)
4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback $19.95  

Book Description

June 1996 Modern War Studies
In May-June 1940 the Germans demolished the French Army, inflicting more than 300,000 French casualties, including more than 120,000 dead. While many historians have focused on France's failure to avoid this catastrophe, Kiesling is the first to show why the French had good reason to trust that their prewar defense policies, military doctrine, and combat forces would preserve the nation.

Kiesling argues that France's devastating defeat was a consequence neither of blindness to the German military threat nor of paralysis in the face of it. Grimly aware of the need to prepare for another war with its arch enemy, French leaders created defense preparations and military doctrines in which they felt confident.

Rather than simply focusing on what went wrong, Kiesling examines the fundamental logic of French defense planning within its cultural, institutional, political, and military contexts. In the process, she provides much new material about the inner workings of the French military, its relations with civilian leaders, its lack of adaptability, and its overreliance on an army reserve that was poorly organized, trained, and led. Ultimately, she makes a persuasive case for France's defense options and offers a useful warning about the utility of the "lessons of history."

The lesson for contemporary policymakers and strategists, Kiesling suggests, is not that the French made mistakes but that nations and armies make policy and strategy under severe constraints. Her study forcefully reminds us how hindsight can blind us to the complexities of preparing for every next war.

This book is part of the Modern War Studies series.


Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


Editorial Reviews

From the Back Cover

"A compellingly distinctive and original contribution to our understanding of the period."--John Sweets, author of Choices in Vichy France: The French Under Nazi Occupation

"A brilliantly written and important book that adds substantially to our understanding of the French experience in 1928-1939, as well as the true nature of national security planning and military reform."--Robert Doughty, author of The Seeds of Disaster: The Development of French Army Doctrine, 1919-1939 and The Breaking Point: Sedan and the Fall of France, 1940

About the Author

Eugenia C. Kiesling, assistant professor of military history at the United States Military Academy, is a former Ford Fellow at Harvard's Center for International Affairs and taught at the University of Alabama for five years. She is the editor and translator of Raoul Castex's Strategic Theories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 320 pages
  • Publisher: Univ Pr of Kansas (June 1996)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0700607641
  • ISBN-13: 978-0700607648
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.3 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,823,685 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

7 Reviews
5 star:
 (4)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.1 out of 5 stars (7 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Seldom considered issues in the popular history, October 8, 2005
Many authors have written on the fall of France in 1940 but Keisling is the first to actually examine how French military structure and policy played perhaps the most significant role in the defeat. A one year conscript army and a totally untrained reserve would have made any doctrine unusable and thus made defeat likely. With an army such as that prepared by France in 1940 it is unlikely they could have made even their own version of mechanized warfare effective. This book will put paid to the arguments that the French officers paid little or no attention to mechanization, modern doctrine or were simply negligent.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Politics kept France from adequately preparing for WWII, September 22, 1996
By A Customer
This review is from: Arming Against Hitler: France and the Limits of Military Planning (Hardcover)
In a closely argued and meticulously researched monograph, Eugenia Kiesling argues that French military preparations prior to WWII were deficient not because of bad doctrine or slovenly preparation, but because of basic political and economic constraints that made it difficult (if not impossi- ble) to keep up with their much more numerous German neighbors. For a close study of exactly what went wrong in France in 1940 and why, this is essential reading for the student of the Second World War.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Poor Assumptions Limit one's Ability to Effectively Plan, October 18, 2001
By 
Trent Hone (Arlington, VA USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Arming Against Hitler: France and the Limits of Military Planning (Hardcover)
One of the main arguments of the book is that the French believed they had an effective, thorough, and well thought out doctrine. The fact that they did not was illustrated by the events of 1940 and the speed with which the country was overwhelmed.

Kiesling does and excellent job of presenting reasons why French doctrine was flawed, and also addresses why it was inadequately tested before the war. Numerous obstacles to the process are presented and explained in this well-researched account.

The implications of Kiesling's argument are profound. They suggest that no matter how thorough the planning and evaluation of a military doctrine, it can still be fundamentally flawed unless the assumptions underlying it are also tested.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews





Only search this product's reviews



Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject