5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Rarely have I seen such quality!, November 17, 2004
This review is from: Arms and Armor: A Pictorial Archive from Nineteenth-Century Sources (Dover Pictorial Archive) (Paperback)
I consider myself fairly picky about the quality of the images I use in my work. These clipart pictures are truly exceptional! Every single image, even the small helmet shots, are of an exceptionally high level of detail. You sometimes feel like the item is right in front of you. At this price, you would not expect the subtle shadings and hatching to be present in the art or print of the book, but they are there, giving the art a sense of depth that I have not found in other publications (even those in full color). This book provides well over 750 high quality clipart images. There are a very few images that are of a far lower detail, and hence, quality level. But that can be excused by the overwhelming achievement of the artist who produced the overall work of this book. For those looking to verbally depict armor or weapons, the value of this book cannot be over stated - it will inspire page after page with its high level of detail and the obvious inspiration of the smiths of history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Great images, no descriptions, January 3, 2008
This review is from: Arms and Armor: A Pictorial Archive from Nineteenth-Century Sources (Dover Pictorial Archive) (Paperback)
The pictures are indeed good quality and there are lots of them. I think it should be made clear, however, that this is only a book of pictures. There are no captions or explanations of any sort. You will surely see something in here that catches your eye, but will have little idea what it was called or where it was from. On many pages there is a country and time period, but most of the time, there are multiple countries listed with no distinction as to which image relates to the respective country. I was also disappointed in the almost complete lack of images of ancient Roman arms and armor. Middle ages to Renaissance is covered quite well, even some of ancient Greece, but Rome (arguably the greatest military force of all history) goes under-represented with only two small pictures from the Roman republic or empire.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent illustrations; astonishingly horrible organization, October 16, 2010
This review is from: Arms and Armor: A Pictorial Archive from Nineteenth-Century Sources (Dover Pictorial Archive) (Paperback)
The book opens with an exquisitely detailed illustration of a beautiful cuirassier armour and horse bard which I immediately recognized as having been made for Louis XIII of France, now located at the Musee d'Armee. Every articulation and every rivet of the armour is detailed, every shadow on the steel expertly rendered in cross-hatching.
The caption reads: German (17th century.)
This is a good preview of the rest of the book. Incredible illustrations; totally bizarre, inaccurate, sketchy descriptions.
Each page is scattered with illustrations, usually one or two large central depictions of armours or weapons and then several other assorted pieces of armour or weaponry. Then the caption at the bottom will say something like: "French, German and Italian." There is absolutely no indication of WHICH of the illustrations corresponds to which of those descriptions. It doesn't even say "left to right, top to bottom" or whatever.
Here's a sample page: a detail of a gauntlet, a round shield, a man in Gothic-style plate armour, a group of Medieval archers, two swords, and a Maximilian-style bellows visored close helmet. At the bottom: French, German and Spanish (15th century.)
Uh...which is which? No explanation at all. Also, many times there will be items on the page which are not remotely within the stated time period - as in this example.
Page 32 shows some sort of brigandine or "jack of plate," next to a munitions-grade cuirassier's harness probably from some time during the Thirty Years War (1600s.) The caption claims that all the items on that page are from the 14th and 15th centuries. No. No way in hell.
It would have been great if someone with the most cursory knowledge of a chronological timeline of arms and armour had been involved in the creation of this book. I would really like to be able to know more about all of the interesting pieces shown. But there is no text accompanying the drawings, other than the wildly-inaccurate dates and countries of origin at the bottom of each page.
However, the illustrations are all top-notch. They're all done in the same cross-hatched style, all extremely detailed. It is similar to the look of late 19th century engravings and newspaper illustrations, like the cartoons by Thomas Nast. That same kind of intricate line style. Very nice to look at.
If you're an artist trying to draw historical battle scenes, this would be an absolutely invaluable resource, since one could easily learn to draw basic sketches of armour and weapons by first copying the drawings in this book, and then experimenting with modifying them.
Overall I would recommend this book. I just need to point out how totally lacking in context all of the illustrations are. But it's really not that much of a problem. If you're just buying this book to look at the drawings, don't let that deter you. But if you want to actually learn about the armour and weapons, buy books like the Osprey series (Men at Arms) and read the articles on myarmoury.com.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No