Customer Reviews

In the Arms of My Enemy

5 star:		(2)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

I'm weary of films claiming to be erotic, homoerotic, or anything to do with men in love, that just aren't. This is about men killing each other. The only love scene is straight.
Another waste of money unless you want to see a movie about war, anger, revenge and rape. Nudity? what nudity? What versions are these other reviewers seeing?

Micha Wald has created a strong masculine drama as writer and director of 'VOLEURS DE CHEVAUX' (IN THE ARMS OF MY ENEMY), a film with a grand sweeping view of nineteenth century life in the region of Russia and has accomplished this with a very small budget, a cast a both unknown and new actors, and a production crew sensitive to place and atmosphere. For some reason the marketing of this film has been directed to a particular audience instead of emphasizing the broad spectrum of those who love epic dramas. It deserves very wide attention, as it is an excellent meditation on the rigors of sibling love among the destitute of the period.

Part I: Him: Jakub (Adrien Jolivet) is the diminutive but strong older brother of Vladimir (Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet), a gentle and handsome young lad who depends on Jakub's 'parenting'. The two destitute brothers fend for themselves, dressed in rags, begging for food and work, until they encounter a group of soldiers who are enlisting young men to be Cossacks. Jakub sees the opportunity for food and shelter and 'belonging' and encourages Vladimir to join him in enlisting. The rigors of 'boot camp' drive Jakub to dangerous extremes and result in his being punished and imprisoned for varying periods of time while he still masters fighting techniques and equestrian skills: the more defenseless Vladimir falls victim to abuses at the hands of his fellow recruits. When Jakub discovers that Vladimir has been raped, he resorts to serious fighting and the two brothers are placed in a solitary confinement box. When their training period is over, the boys witness the brutality of the Cossacks as they slaughter innocent families, and this is the breaking point that drives them to desertion. They escape the Cossacks on stolen horses, but while bathing in a river, their horses are stolen.

Part II: Them: The horse thieves are two other impoverished brothers with a strong parallel - Roman (Grégoire Colin) is the stronger, pugilistic older brother who takes care of his younger brother Elias (François-René Dupont), a gentle lad crippled in youth by a goring from a ram but who maintains an ability to communicate with animals. They live humbly in a forest shack and an underground hideaway, and when they make their rare excursions into the village tavern, Roman jealously guards the more fragile Elias, threatening even the girl Virina (Mylène St-Sauveur) with whom Elias is infatuated. Using a combination of their skills, Roman and Elias steal the horses of Jakub and Vladimir, and the trail of vengeance begins.

Part III: Us: Both sets of brothers are needy and their destinies collide due to the theft of horses. Tragedies mount, both sets of brothers intensify their filial bond of compassion, but the older brothers fight to the death of one and in the end one of the brothers provides succor to the survivor of the other set of brothers and the ending leaves the audience to guess the future altered by violence and need.

Micha Wald draws powerful performances from his young cast of beautiful actors and with a minimum of dialogue ( in French with English subtitles) he creates wholly credible characters about whom we care very much. The cinematography by Jean-Paul de Zaetijd is superb and the haunting musical score by Jóhann Jóhannsson, Jeff Mercelis and Stephan Micus is rich in capturing the harmonies of the music of the period and the location. In all, this is a visually stunning film and a story that is subtle and touching and impressively sophisticated in the manner in which it is told. Highly recommended. Grady Harp, September 08

I wasn't sure this was going to be a good film but it actually is. I loved the end result. Just seems fitting.

There seems to be an argument going on about whether this movie is about gay love or not. I like to give my 2 cents worth. First of all, sexuality is a very complicated subject. For me, in order to be classified as a gay person, you must crave both emotional and sexual attachment/fulfilment with the same sex. The confusing thing about this movie stems from the fact that somewhere in the middle of the movie, the younger horse-thief was shown having sexual intercouse with a local village girl. A few scene later, the same guy was singing a rustic folk tune to his male friends in a tavern which aroused the interest of the Cossack soldier. And after several emphathetic exchange between them, the viewers witnessed that a sparkle was ignited betweeen the two strangers. At the end, we saw the younger horse thief chasing the Cossack soldier. Why was he chasing the Cossack soldier? There might be two distinct possibilties: (1) the younger horse thief wanted to find emotional and sexual union with the soldier; (2) the younger horse thief wanted to substitute his recently deceased older brother with the soldier as a surrogate care-taker. Either possibility spells trouble. Even though the horse thief did care for the wounded Cossack soldier in the movie, the screen writer did not include any sex scene between the two males. So if the horse thief only wanted emotional attachment with the soldier, this relationship couldn't be classified as a genuine gay one because sex was not involved...

THIS IS A MIOVIE I HAVE WANTED FOR SOME TIME. I NOW OWN IT AT A FAIR PRICE. I AM COMPLETELY HAPPY WITH THE TRANSACTION. AS I HAVE NOT WATCHED IT YET I CAN OLY THANK THE SELLER FOR DELIVERING WHAT WAS PROMISED.