| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
26 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Try to read this book,
By "shaskin" (Ann Arbor) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Art of Aureole (Hardcover)
Long awaited, "The Art of Aureole" has a most beautiful cover of ethereal food. Inside, it has to be the worst designed cookbook I've ever seen. The type is mish-mash of white on a dark grey background and has been set in four different directions on every page. This is for "artistic" effect, no doubt. To make matters worse for the home chef who might be making a dish for the first time, they are impossible to follow. The graphic designers need to go back to school (if they ever went in the first place) and be taught to remember that no matter how slick they can design something, it has to serve a purpose. And the purpose of a cookbook is to make the food look great and the recipes that can be followed. The design of the book serves no purpose except to salve their probably quite large egos. That said, the recipes look as though they would be perfect for our annual "Insane Chefs" dinner. For this dinner, we choose an annual cookbook as a theme specifically because the recipes are difficult and/or the ingredients are tough to find. We like a challenge. In the past few years, we've used the books from the French Laundry (try finding Morello cherries on-line three years ago!), Terra, Lumiere (this had teeny baby bok choy), and Le Bec Fin, to name a few. The common thread was that all the cookbooks have a high degree of difficulty and take some solid previous kitchen experience, especially to get around the inevitable errors. This book compounds the issue with its goofy layout and text. At least we can follow the others. Designers, take it as a mantra. You can make the restaurant look as glitzy whacko as you want, that's an environment. You CAN'T make a cookbook look insane. People who actually use it need to follow the recipes inside. The recipes in the book look stupendous, but I can't recommend it to our group. Maybe the designers will foot the bill to print a small book with plain recipies so they can be followed in the kitchen without standing on your head. One other thing, and for us this is a biggie...THERE ARE NO DESSERTS. None. Nary a one. I might have given "The Art of Aureole: two stars if there had been some desserts included. But nooooooooooo, they evidently didn't think desserts were worth including. Charlie Palmer should check out what was included in all the books mentioned above, especially what Thomas Keller had included in the French Laundry Cookbook. Stellar. I'm more disappointed in the quality of this cookbook than I have been in any book in years. It should have been as spectacular to match the quality of the restaurant. Instead, it's a work of vain crud that never should have had trees killed to produce it. It should have come out next year with better forethought to the recipes included (or not) and design. The designer should be lashed with some raw skate. Or at the very least made to take Graphic Design 101.
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
WORST COOKBOOK EVER,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Art of Aureole (Hardcover)
This is the worst cookbook I've ever seen. Don't be fooled into thinking it's an inspiring art book, either. Not only would it be useless in the kitchen, it would never end up on my coffee table, either. This is bad art, too.The photos are totally unappetizing. The design is lame. It's like a display of how horrific you can make food look. It's disgusting. I'm surprised at Charlie Palmer and Ten Speed Press. His other books and his cooking are awesome. Even if these recipes are fabulous, I'll never know it because the book is not useable -- with stark type going in many different directions on each page -- it's impossible to cook from it. Design professors! You can use this book as an example of how function should never follow form. Or in this case, how function can actually cease to exist because of irresponsible use of design.
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Oh the Irony,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Art of Aureole (Hardcover)
I didn't listen to other reviewers who panned this booked before I bought it. I've eaten at Aureole in New York and was wowed by its commitment to excellence. Surely the cookbook maintains those standards. Sadly it does not.First, every page of the book is white on black. Images of the dishes (if that's what they are since they are nearly impossible to make out) are in negative. Completely unappetizing. The text of the recipes is at 45 degree angles on the page and not easy to read or follow. Was this an experiment that failed horribly? I think so. The most ironic is the word "art" in the title which is not what you find inside the book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|