Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush (Paperback)

by Center for Constitutional Rights (Author)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description
In the halls of Congress and on the front pages of a growing number of mainstream periodicals, impeachment is being discussed more and more widely. And many leading constitutional scholars agree: There has never been so strong a case for impeachment since Richard Nixon.

In this gripping new book, one of our nation's leading institutions of constitutional scholarship, the Center for Constitutional Rights, sets out the legal arguments for impeachment detailing four separate charges-warrantless surveillance, misleading Congress on the reasons for the Iraq war, violating laws against torture, and subverting the Constitution's separation of powers-it is, say the CCR attorneys, a case of black letter law, with abundant evidence.

The book also contains the relevant laws and legal precedents. It explains what the Constitution says about impeachment-and gives a brief history of impeachment, its procedures, and previous articles of impeachment against presidents Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton.

Founded in 1966 by attorneys defending civil rights activists in the South, the Center for Constitutional Rights is one of America's most prestigious collectives of constitutional lawyers and experts. It is a nonprofit legal and education organization dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

About the Author
Michael Ratner, Bill Goodman and other experts from the Center for Constitutional Rights set out the legal arguments for impeachment. Founded in 1966 by attorneys defending civil rights activists in the South, the Center for Constitutional Rights is one of America's most prestigious collectives of constitutional lawyers and experts.

Product Details

• Paperback: 144 pages
• Publisher: Melville House; 1 edition (March 1, 2006)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1933633085
• ISBN-13: 978-1933633084
• Product Dimensions: 7.4 x 5.5 x 0.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (18 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #591,683 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

44 of 44 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars A Book for Every American, May 2, 2006

By	!Edwin C. Pauzer (New York City) - See all my reviews (TOP 1000 REVIEWER)

While the title announces the obvious bias of the writers, this work is not an attempt at Bush-bashing. On the contrary, the authors present a dispassionate list of four articles and specifications against George W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors.

In layman's language, the authors make a compelling case for recommending impeachment of our president. They compile their reasons as one would expect to hear them argued in a court of law. The book provides the reader with background information on where impeachment came from, what the founding fathers thought of the concept, and how it should be applied.

The most disturbing parts of this short book is the list of specifications against the president based upon what he has allowed or ordered to happen: unlawful detentions of American citizens, kidnappings, torture, and constitutional abuse by changing the law and the balance of power within our republic by adding "signing statements." The book explains clearly the constitutional limitations on presidential power that is currently being ignored. The specifications do not sound like anything I would have imagined in America, or what it means to be an American.

Our president took an oath to faithfully execute the office of the president and preserve, protect and defend the constitution. After reading this, you may have your doubts.

I recommend this for everyone.

77 of 85 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Expert analysis of Constitutional Law, Impeachment and Justice, March 30, 2006

By	Nicholas Soucy (Lansing, Mi United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Regardless of which political party you identify with, I urge you to read this short but critical text. At 144 pages, most readers will digest this little tome in one day, undoubtedly fascinated and persuaded by its core arguments.

The book conveniently chronicles the major legal blunders and human rights offenses perpetrated by the Bush Administration including: illegal indefinite detention of US and international citizens without allowing them legal counsel; condoning of torture; illegal wire-tapping and pre-emptive warfare. Arguments could also be made that the Administration is guilty of violating myriad environmental laws.

I'm proud to see that this book has turned out to be legally astute, logical and comprehensive. The authors avoid ad hominem attacks on the president's character, and instead focus on his actions, his violations and some similarities to Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

The arguments are cogently written and easy to follow even for lay readers like me who are not legal scholars.

It's important to remember that impeachment is a two-part process. Put simply, the impeachment from the House is basically the investigation, accusation or pre-trial stage. No removal from office occurs at this point. Next, the Senate acts as judge and jury, examining the details and removing the accused from office if the incriminating evidence is clear and persuasive enough. (The book covers the process in more eloquent detail.)

It is of paramount importance to use this governmental tool called impeachment to show our citizens and the rest of the world that we are indeed concerned and outraged by subversion of the U.S. Constitution and international law.

Demanding accountability from our government leaders is the ultimate patriotic duty. We can show our support for the USA by demonstrating that we will not tolerate Bush's affront to our country's laws.

Voting is the very least we can do as citizens in a representative democracy. American citizens ought to be more actively communicating to our representatives that the entire nation is willing to act as a checking and balancing network for the three branches of government.

It may turn out that Congress doesn't agree with the Center for Constitutional Rights, and that the Senate will acquit the charges, leaving George W. Bush in power. Regardless of the verdict, we should still make the effort to investigate the history of accusations and evidence made against the president. If we neglect this opportunity, then we become indirect advocates of the Administration's policies. Remember that silence and inaction about presidential misconduct are tantamount to complicity.

If the Democrats win the Congress back in the mid-term (2006) elections, there will be a better chance of impeaching, trying and removing the president from office. Until then, we need to research and prepare for what will prove to be a long and tiring struggle to bring a corrupt administration to justice.

This is a serious book for serious times. I urge all who read this book to buy a copy for their House Representatives, which can be done for a discounted [...] from the Center for Constitutional Rights website (www.CCR-NY.org).

68 of 77 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Critical book for critical times, March 10, 2006

By	Tough times call for Tough action (Missouri) - See all my reviews

I have been skeptical of this "impeachment" talk since I first it heard it publicly muttered. However, as disaster after disaster has happened under Bush's watch, I couldn't simply ignore the impeachment banter. So, it was with some reservation that I picked up this book written by the Center for Constitutional Rights.

I was apprehensive about reading it not just because of the subject, but also the typical inaccesible writing style of attorneys. However, I found this book and the arguments laid out, easy to digest and after careful reading - easy to agree with.

The Center for Constitutional Rights' arguments are thoughtful, pragmatic, and - I actually have to say - necessary. I can only hope that there will be some Senators with guts enough to take the stand before things get any worse.