Most Helpful Customer Reviews
51 of 56 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Reification vs. Imagination, December 12, 1999
This review is from: The Aryan Christ: The Secret Life of Carl Jung (Hardcover)
When I read Noll's Aryan Christ I felt a sense of deja vu. Had I not read this argument before and found it quite trite? Some searching in my memory and reading the footnotes in Noll's book, confirmed my hunch: For this book Noll recycled an earlier article he had published entitled 'Jung the Leontocephalus', which had appeared in a Jungian journal called 'Spring, a Journal of Archetype and Culture' in 1992. When I read Noll's article then, I thought then that it misrepresented the approach Jung outlines in his writings of the events of 1925 during one of his active imaginations. Out of an episode which takes up no more than a dozen pages in that book, Noll has given us a fairy tale about Jung's inner life and connection to the Mithraic religion. A careful reading of Jung's 'Seminar Notes of 1925' show that Noll's take on Jung's experienced images contradicts Jung's own. Had Noll used a more germane approach, he could have saved himself writing this book and foregone temporary fame and fortune while riding on Jung' shoulders and abusing him. Why do I say this? On page 99 of the Seminar Notes, Jung states clearly how images of the kind he had experienced should be approached. Jung says: 'Anybody could be caught by these things and lost in them--some throw the experience away saying it is all nonsense, and thereby losing their best value, for these are the creative images. Another may identify himself with the images and become a crank or a fool.' It seems to me that Noll has identified himself with an image, which isn't even his own! and has turned himself into a fool about it, and at times a crank. Jung's more sober view is attested again a little later in his 'Seminar Notes', on page 104, a student asks Jung:'Do you think that some development of the Mithraic religion may become a living religion in the near future?' To which Jung answers: 'In itself this religion is as antiquated as can be. It is only relatively important as being the brother of Christianity, wich has assimilated some elements from it.' Clearly, Jung admonishes against reifying such inner images, albeit to take them very seriously indeed. Noll's own biography is replete with a cultic, approach to Jung. In footnote Nr. 2, of the 'Jung the Leontocephalus' article, Noll lets on about his own mystic activities: 'I wish to thank the following members of the informal 'mystery cult' that has formed through their repeated attendance at a series of seminars on these and related topics which I led in the Summer and Fall of 1991 and the Spring and Summer of 1992 for the Aion Society and the C.G. Jung Center of Philadelphia (2008 Chancellor Street,Philadelphia, PA 19103)...' Noll then thanks some 25 persons including one whom he calles his 'resident soror mystica'. In other words, Noll seems to have been a sort of a grandmaster of a Jung cult with its resident groupies. And just a few years later he blames Jung for his own activities. What Noll offers in his 'Aryan Christ' is the creation of a yarn which in its most serious variant is called a 'pseudologia fantastica', a false story of one's life. In Noll's case, about Jung's life. Carl Gustav Jung, by Noll's own admission (see the various pro-Jungian adulatory introductions he wrote to his Encyclopedia, the Werewolf book, etc.) must have been the positive guiding force in Noll's earlier career as a 'Jung-oriented' psychologist. Then, in Jungian terms, his 'entantiodromia' set in, still umbilically connected to Jung, albeit as the grand debunker of a now negatively toned symbiosis. My advice: Read Jung if he interests you and read Richard Noll as a reminder of how a self-appointed, somehow jilted Jungian disciple falsifies His former master's life and writings.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
69 of 83 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A disappointing, intellectually dishonest book, September 17, 2001
This review is from: The Aryan Christ: The Secret Life of Carl Jung (Hardcover)
The polemic and lurid title and the sensationalism of the blurbs on the cover bespeak the author's partisan resentments and his hunger to sell copies at the expense of intellectual honesty. The author makes much of the fact that that Jung hid his esoteric "neo-pagan" beliefs behind a mask of Christianity. Anyone even remotely familiar with Jung's work would recognize that his beliefs evolved over time. That he did not instantly publicly proclaim them as they emerged from his mind is hardly surprising or sinister. The author's assertion that Jung sought to make himself the high priest of some Aryan religion and that he saw himself as "The Aryan Christ" is absurd. To be sure, Jung was hardly an orthodox Christian and he and his followers saw their movement as something more than a mere clinical system. What is so sinister about that? After all, Freud was hardly an orthodox Jew and he and his followers saw their system as something more than an innovative system of psycho-therapy. Whatever personal motives the author has for making a career out of trashing Jung, there is a market for this tripe because the academic and publishing establishment has a hatred for all manifestations of Germanic culture. A large chunk of this books is a mean spirited, gossipy account of the lives of three of Jung's female analysands and analysts. The connection between these lives and the author's thesis about Jung is tenuous. These accounts are mere sensationalist padding for a very slight book. The book contains some useful biographical material and the footnotes are of far greater value than the text. Apologies to Amazaon.com -- but don't waste your money on this book. Get it from the library or get a cheap used copy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mitra, Baldur, Christ, April 6, 2006
This review is from: The Aryan Christ: The Secret Life of Carl Jung (Hardcover)
Some of the reviewers suggest that this book is a mean spirited attack on Jung. I didnt receive it that way, and after reading this book I followed up with others by Jung himself. I've found Jung's writings about religion most fascinating. I don't find Jung's interest in volkisch movement, pagan renewal, or the nexus between non-Christian archetypes and Christian symbols offensive in the slightest bit. Some other reviewers seem to think the author meant to smear Jung, but if he did, it was lost on me.
As for whether or not the author's premise that Jung was interested in the "collective unconscious" as a sort of racial folk memory-- I don't think that's all that radical of a notion. Indeed, if you consider Jung's postwar friendship with Miguel Serrano, as recounted in Serrano's work "C.G. Jung and Hermann Hesse," then perhaps the esoteric understanding of some of Jung's work is not so implausible.
I recommend this book to people who are interested in the history or psychology of religion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|