2 Reviews
|
5 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
4 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
3 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
2 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
1 star:
|
|
(0) |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
The Ascetic Self, August 1, 2007
This review is from: The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition (Paperback)
Although Flood is obviously a knowledgeable scholar of religion (his primer on Hinduism is excellent), I found that The Ascetic Self had limited usefulness due to Flood's forced and largely unsupported definition of asceticism. More specifically, Flood asserts that there is no asceticism outside of traditional religious contexts -- and only cosmological ones at that. This narrow and arguably untenable definition stands in opposition to the recent work of other scholars of asceticism including Geoffrey Galt Harpham and Richard Valantasis who assert (following Freud, Weber, Foucault and others) that asceticism is fundamental to the formation of culture itself and therefore, a very present force in contemporary Western societies. In the face of this compelling scholarship, Flood's definition just doesn't seem to fall within the 'realm of the true' and therefore represents a crucial flaw in his project. If Flood had wanted to limit the scope of his project to traditional religious contexts, he could have done this without excluding the possibility that some forms of secular asceticism do indeed exist and thrive in modern society.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Recommended review, September 24, 2008
This review is from: The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition (Paperback)
This book is not recommended for someone beginning to research the subject of asceticism. While the author does a good job exploring themes in ascetical practice, it is clear he assumes the reader already has an idea of what he is writing about. Terms, including those found in the subtitle, are never presented in a clear and delineating manner, and if the writer's intent is to offer "a new paradigm for comparative religion," the book should have been better organized to make his case, as it reads more like a collection of related essays than an effort to establish a new framework. The "essays," though, are good reading, and I found the chapter on Simone Weil informative and his concise analysis of Evagrian cosmology in Chapter 6 to be helpful, so the book is not lacking in providing insights into the subject. If you are debating the purchase, there is a detailed review at www.hermitary.com which I recommend. (9/2008)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
|