17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
thought provoking Father Dowling mystery, August 9, 2008
This review is from: Ash Wednesday (Father Dowling Mysteries) (Hardcover)
On Ash Wednesday, just out of prison Nathaniel Green, who killed his wife ten years ago when he pulled the plug on the life support machine so she could go to heaven, asks the pastor of St. Hilary's if he will put ashes on his forehead though he is no longer a Catholic. He gave up on religion when his beloved Florence suffered from terminal cancer and kept alive by so called caring people when she just wanted to die.
Nathaniel and Florence belonged to St. Hilary before he committed euthanasia. Some people especially Florence's sister do not want to turn the other cheek and let him return to the flock. They condemn him for murdering his spouse quoting the bible and the Ten Commandments. On the other hand Father Dowling understands why a human would act mercifully to end the suffering of a loved one although he feels deeply that it is still is a sin. As the parish divides over the issue of mercy killing, Dowling begins to see some incongruence in what he hears happened a decade ago; as he quietly investigates he begins to wonder if Nathaniel actually pulled the plug or is covering for someone.
This is a thought provoking Father Dowling mystery; perhaps the best in years as everyday people struggle with the difficult and complex issue of euthanasia; the St. Hilary congregation is divided over the subject and the killer. The story line is fast-paced once the whisper campaign begins that Green is out of prison and home and never slows down as he is shunned while he reads Crime and Punishment seeking absolution, but for what asks Father Dowling?
Harriet Klausner
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Series has not grown over time, November 22, 2008
This review is from: Ash Wednesday (Father Dowling Mysteries) (Hardcover)
This installment in the Father Dowling series is not noticeably worse than the others - but it's not any better, either. The thing is, the series has always had slightly wooden dialog - characters who don't use contractions most of the time; characters who speak as though they are reading out of an instruction book - and that hasn't improved in all these years. In addition, the characters haven't really grown; although we see a few characters who have only been recently introduced, whom we find out a bit more about in each book, the older characters still think the same way, and have the same unresolved issues.
Plot-wise, the Father Dowling series has always had plots just interesting enough to keep me reading the next installment, though never quite interesting enough to be bouncing in my seat awaiting it. The earlier volumes have more theology, and following the theological discussions and theological elements of the characters' motivations has been interesting. This volume has almost no theology; the only discussions Father Dowling has about the ethics of turning off life support are with a character who seems to have been introduced solely so that McInerny could enjoy using the nickname "Willy Nilly" - the character certainly doesn't have any other depth to him.
The alleged murderer in this volume leaves all his money to a woman he hates - supposedly to spite her by his display of Christian charity. This seems so unlikely to me as to be unbelievable. The potential heirs fighting over money? That's believable. Sometimes it's hard to tell them apart, though - reading along, one tends to have to think, wait, which one was Madeline? Which one was Natalie? How are they related to each other again? How is Jason related to Nathaniel? The only relatives whose relationship are clearly explained are Peanuts Pianone's, whose cousin married the sister of Augie, Carmela's business partner. Another thing that seems unbelievable in the plot is that the private investigator doesn't find Eugene's background on the Internet - but an intrepid woman reporter does, easily - even though the PI is supposedly a good one.
Several side plots are left totally at loose ends: what happened to Eugene Schmidt? What happened to Tetzel, the alcoholic reporter? And speaking of questions, one big one I have is why the local medical society doesn't prosecute Jason for calling himself "the Foot Doctor."
If you've been following the series, then you'll probably want to go ahead and read this one, but it won't be a "couldn't put it down" experience. If you haven't been following the series, the behavior of the regular characters may seem inexplicable; this wouldn't be a good choice for the first book in the series to read.
In short: wooden dialog, some unlikely gaps, but just enough of an interesting plot to make it readable. Add it to your "to be read" pile - but don't bother moving it up to the top.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No